If you’re calling it a “trial” you’re not “tracking” anything. |
You, too. The most basic thing to know about this is that it’s not a trial |
There's been a ongoing decline in critical thinking: "A recent article in The Wall Street Journal reported: “On average, students make strides in their ability to reason, but because so many start at such a [critical thinking] deficit, many still graduate without the ability to read a scatterplot, construct a cohesive argument or identify a logical fallacy” [1] Similarly, in their book, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa studied 2,400 college students at 24 different universities over a 4-year period [2]. They reported that critical thinking and other skills such as writing were no longer progressing during college as compared to previous generations of students. In an interview with NPR, Arum sounded the alarm as to why we should be concerned about these findings: “Our country today is part of a global economic system, where we no longer have the luxury to put large numbers of kids through college and university and not demand of them that they are developing these higher-order skills [such as critical thinking] that are necessary not just for them, but for our society as a whole.” [3]" https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-intuitive-parent/201703/the-emerging-crisis-in-critical-thinking |
We don’t need your lecture about using non conventional sources to obtain news because we’re using the primary source. We know more about the insurrection than you do because we’re witnessing the testimony of people who have insider knowledge and are sharing that knowledge under penalty of perjury. I’m not relying on someone else to characterize what a witness has said; I’m listening to the witness’s own testimony under oath. You’re never going to get a source more accurate than that. |
Lol…you’re clueless enough to call it primary source knowledge of an insurrection. I’m pretty sure if it’s a crime, it’s sedition, not insurrection. Once again, my lazy interlocutors show themselves to be Doubly Credulous, Unrepentantly Moronic. |
| I am as going to watch it but i ended up binging below deck Mediterranean. |
Huge mistake. The hearings were a thousand times better |
Eyewitness testimony is a primary source. Why does that trigger you? |
Or - they have better things to do? Alphabetizing canned goods for example. |
It’s good to see Republicans fully unmasked in how much they hate this country. |
Participating in an insurrection could lead to a criminal charge of sedition. Not everyone who engaged in a violent act on 1/6 is charged with sedition. Try to keep up instead of engaging in pointless sophistry. |
|
I actually participated in this poll. I said I mostly did not watch (had extended family medical emergency and I did almost nothing else) and it did but change my mind. I already knew Trump was the instigator of a failed coup. I do look at the nightlights of the hearings. |
|
It did NOT change my mind. And yes, I have looked at HIGHlights of the hearings.
|
|
Many people are not watching because they know Trump is guilty of plotting a coup. I am the only person in my entire group of family and friends who are watching this. Everyone else catches highlights on TV. They are all convinced he knowingly fomented an insurrection, and don't feel they need to watch the entire thing. I'm sure a lot of Trump fans think exactly the opposite, and don't watch for the same reason. |