Looking like Southern...Great Look! |
Charter school means the families have to be motivated enough to transport their kids & fill out paperwork. |
The other issue is peer group. Many POC with means send their kids to private rather to even Deal or Wilson, because while the white kids tend to be uniformly higher SES and higher performing, that isn't the same of the kids of color. So there have been issues with being drawn into a crowd where there is pressure not to be seen as a nerd and to de-prioritize academics. |
This. As a parent of black children this is my concern and why we are planning on private starting in middle. It’s also my experience. I attended a high-performing HS, but was the ONLY black male in any of my honors/AP classes for all four years - in school that was 30% black! I found that my black middle class peers (and still good friends) did far worse than their SES status would have predicted versus white kids. It’s just anecdotal, but I always got the sense that the presence of an overwhelmingly low income black population (which was bussed in from nearby city) had a depressing impacts on the academic fortunes of the middle class blacks kids. And I wouldn’t even say behavior was a problem so much as expectations. How did I manage to avoid the pull-down: my parents were well-eatablished/ respected in local education circles and I was the rare black kid that was expected to pull straight As, etc. I didn’t always like that, but I see it as a true blessing…that my kids won’t enjoy. So they’ll need the peer group that I could do without. Sadly, that means a private school… |
Thank you for sharing! I can really see what you're saying. I've seen the dynamic played out before, now that I reflect on your words. Could you possibly recommend privates with potential for academically supportive peer groups? |
For K-8, look at Lowell. For High school, look at St. John's. |
|
For K-8, look at Lowell. For High school, look at St. John's. thank you!! |
That’s not it. Functionally half of DC Public School students attend charters. Even more go to Out of Boundary DCPS schools. So a MAJORITY of DC parents are willing to fill out applications and arrange transporation. |
Uh yeah, that is it. |
+ 100 |
Yes, half of parents are willing to do this. And the kids of families where parents are not able to be involved in this way, family is in crisis, family has criminal justice system involvement, family is experiencing housing insecurity, etc. are concentrated in the by right schools that fully half of DC parents are jumping through hoops to avoid. The resulting cohort at those schools has all kinds of behavior and social issues at a much higher rate than they would if so many parents didn’t go to charters or OOB options. Get it? |
You anti-charter people are so g**damn twitchy. Get a grip. A PP mentioned that a child was murdered due to violent nonsense happening at KIPP— a CHARTER school. So the answer “because parents motivated “ to another PPs question about why Latin is not know for chaos and violence is “not it”. Keep up or butt out. |
I’m the PP you’re responding to. I don’t really understand your angry rant. I certainly not anti charter, so you seem to have misunderstood my post pretty dramatically. Are you saying that your DON’T think that charters benefit from having a cohort of kids whose parents care enough to play the lottery want work to get them to charter schools? Really? That seems like a wildly naive position. The charter k-8 that my kid attended certainly benefitted from that - the school admin was kind of a mess, but involved committed parents made it work very much better than it might have. |
I love that our charter is comprised of UMC families and high-motivated familes of modest SES. |
So one bad thing happened at one charter? That proves nothing |