Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all reflects badly on Biden. That he could not make a better choice - all these same types of things and stories being said now about Kamala Harris were said before after her failed campaign. She is the same person with the same problems.

Then after picking her, why aren't they supporting her? You never saw Obama and his staff negging Biden like this and I guarantee you Biden is and was an idiot. They carried Biden's idiot ass for years. They dropped some negative stuff on him when they did not want him to run in 2016.

You are looking at this the wrong way.

Consider for a moment that the best way to isolate and undermine a political opponent is to use them for what they can do for you, then keep them close but assign them to the worst brief that they will most certainly fail at

The staffers who are leaving for other jobs know that Kamala has served her purpose and is now being fazed out

Enter the " leaks " by staffers to Politco and the like

Its not just Buckingham Palace that has " the firm" , you know

yeah, b/c distrust of bluetooth tech is going to make me not vote for kamala *sarcasm*

-democratic voter who doesn't like kamala

[Anonymous]

So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

hah, trashing the people who are defending kamala now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

Right. You were one of the dummies posting that all the liberals voting for Youngkin were trolls. Guess what? People like me are going to think for ourselves, not tow some party line.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

This is tour defense of the poorest choice of VP since Palin? The difference is Kamala won - but not on her merits - but on the hope she would not outshine Joe. A very low bar if one can articulate without whispers in an earpiece or being held up by one’s nurse/spouse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's not resigning, you loons.

Get over it. She was elected VP by the American people.

No. A small portion of the population demanded Biden select her. Voters had no better option in the pool.

Accept reality / then get over it. Her abilities were not vote getters as proven by her performance.

[Anonymous]

Media + the fools in this thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, so Alex Thompson is a right wing OANN personality?

Exactly. As usual, anyone who doesn’t spew the party line is “right-wing.”

Has Politico ever reported on another VP’s choice of technology negatively? When it’s a more prudent choice from a national security standpoint?

That's an oddly (and laughably) specific question.

You don’t think that’s a seriously strange thing for a leading media outlet to have three reporters covering? Come on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

Right. You were one of the dummies posting that all the liberals voting for Youngkin were trolls. Guess what? People like me are going to think for ourselves, not tow some party line.

THIS ^^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

This is tour defense of the poorest choice of VP since Palin? The difference is Kamala won - but not on her merits - but on the hope she would not outshine Joe. A very low bar if one can articulate without whispers in an earpiece or being held up by one’s nurse/spouse.

This is so true. Had McCain/Palin won, can you imagine the scathing critiques of Palin by Democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Media + the fools in this thread

If I were a Republican Op, I would drop this cartoon and that line above about the 'republicans here pretending to be democrats'. If the Democrats care about beating the Republicans, they for once should face up to their own failures, not sweep them under the rug.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Media + the fools in this thread

This is just lazy. Surely there are better Democratic candidates than Biden and Harris. The line, "well, maybe we are incompetent but at least we aren't scary" will only get you so far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Media + the fools in this thread

This is just lazy. Surely there are better Democratic candidates than Biden and Harris. The line, "well, maybe we are incompetent but at least we aren't scary" will only get you so far.

+many
Sad truth is that for the professional Democrats who spout this crap, it has worked. But if you care about the broader society, it’s an unmitigated disaster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So many republicans here pretending to be democrats who don’t like Kamala. We see through you!

Do not be ashamed of Democratic avoirdupois

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Media + the fools in this thread

This is just lazy. Surely there are better Democratic candidates than Biden and Harris. The line, "well, maybe we are incompetent but at least we aren't scary" will only get you so far.

To be fair, the same exact thing could be said about Republican candidates. Right now your frontrunner is Trump and even if he doesn't run, he will surely have a hand in determining who can run. Do better, Republicans! The future of our democracy depends on it.