Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris should have stayed in the Senate. But she obviously thinks she has what it takes to be the Big Kahuna. I wonder if she is willing to listen to the people around her regarding the likelihood of that. Or if anyone is willing to be honest about it.

She never cared about the Senate. She only viewed it as a springboard to the White House.

Smart enough to graft her way to the Senate but not smart enough to understand she'd never be president and that it's better being a lifetime senator from California with no real accountability or oversight than exposed as a political hack in the limelight of being VP and heir in waiting to the presidency.

Interesting.

Your point about the Senate is a good one. I think there's a bad institutional culture that elevated her and they are reaping what they sowed.

She used it the same way as Hillary Clinton. Both were rewarded for putting up with bad men.

And serving as the woke/feminist beard for those men. Both are obviously playing a role. Neither really cared enough about things to admit mistakes and learn.

Wait...which bad man are we talking about in Kamala's case?

Dunno…..the guy she slept with to get ahead in LA? She’s managed to be gross and stupid.

She certainly did that in SF.

In LA too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are screwed in 2024. If they dump Harris the incur the wrath of the AA community and women. If they run her, she gets demolished in white working class areas. And Joe is way too old for a second term.

I'm Black. The real Black community never liked phony Harris. Stop believing fake sellouts and inorganic astroturfing. Harris is and always has been a childless, soulless and conniving big tech (and Wall Street) puppet.

This this this this.


And she's perceived even worse among Latinos given what she did/ didn't do back in CA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The wonderful wisdom of progressive white men running to the rescue of failing black women.

One really has to laugh at the ironies of our times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris should have stayed in the Senate. But she obviously thinks she has what it takes to be the Big Kahuna. I wonder if she is willing to listen to the people around her regarding the likelihood of that. Or if anyone is willing to be honest about it.

She never cared about the Senate. She only viewed it as a springboard to the White House.

Smart enough to graft her way to the Senate but not smart enough to understand she'd never be president and that it's better being a lifetime senator from California with no real accountability or oversight than exposed as a political hack in the limelight of being VP and heir in waiting to the presidency.

Interesting.

Your point about the Senate is a good one. I think there's a bad institutional culture that elevated her and they are reaping what they sowed.

She used it the same way as Hillary Clinton. Both were rewarded for putting up with bad men.

And serving as the woke/feminist beard for those men. Both are obviously playing a role. Neither really cared enough about things to admit mistakes and learn.

Wait...which bad man are we talking about in Kamala's case?

Dunno…..the guy she slept with to get ahead in LA? She’s managed to be gross and stupid.

She certainly did that in SF.

In LA too?

DP. Ugh this is why I cringed on inauguration day when I had several friends put up pictures of Harris saying they were so happy for their daughters. Maybe they didn't know that part of her history, idk?... I have a daughter and I would never want her to work her way up the way Harris did. I would never want her to be selected the way Harris was because of things she did. Networking is always important but sleeping your way to the top is so gross. Why do women view her as a role model? She's anything but.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris should have stayed in the Senate. But she obviously thinks she has what it takes to be the Big Kahuna. I wonder if she is willing to listen to the people around her regarding the likelihood of that. Or if anyone is willing to be honest about it.

She never cared about the Senate. She only viewed it as a springboard to the White House.

Smart enough to graft her way to the Senate but not smart enough to understand she'd never be president and that it's better being a lifetime senator from California with no real accountability or oversight than exposed as a political hack in the limelight of being VP and heir in waiting to the presidency.

Interesting.

Your point about the Senate is a good one. I think there's a bad institutional culture that elevated her and they are reaping what they sowed.

She used it the same way as Hillary Clinton. Both were rewarded for putting up with bad men.

And serving as the woke/feminist beard for those men. Both are obviously playing a role. Neither really cared enough about things to admit mistakes and learn.

Wait...which bad man are we talking about in Kamala's case?

Dunno…..the guy she slept with to get ahead in LA? She’s managed to be gross and stupid.

She certainly did that in SF.

In LA too?

DP. Ugh this is why I cringed on inauguration day when I had several friends put up pictures of Harris saying they were so happy for their daughters. Maybe they didn't know that part of her history, idk?... I have a daughter and I would never want her to work her way up the way Harris did. I would never want her to be selected the way Harris was because of things she did. Networking is always important but sleeping your way to the top is so gross. Why do women view her as a role model? She's anything but.

I don't get it either. We have discussed this at home with our DD. So many women are much better role models.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these dumb white a fail up like Quayle, but a black woman has to be five times better to get half the respect.

Look at what happened to Quayle: ceaselessly mocked during his tenure as VP, national joke on television and fodder for Saturday Night Live. I was only in middle school but I remember the schoolyard cracks about Dan Quayle and his misspelling of potato(e). Can't get worse than that.

I suppose it is an interesting debate. Who is dumber? Kamala Harris or Dan Quayle?

Hard to tell.

+1
But of course, the PP will blame mocking of Kamala on "racist whites," whereas the mocking of Dan was perfectly acceptable. So sick of the race-baiting dolts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these dumb white a fail up like Quayle, but a black woman has to be five times better to get half the respect.

Look at what happened to Quayle: ceaselessly mocked during his tenure as VP, national joke on television and fodder for Saturday Night Live. I was only in middle school but I remember the schoolyard cracks about Dan Quayle and his misspelling of potato(e). Can't get worse than that.

I suppose it is an interesting debate. Who is dumber? Kamala Harris or Dan Quayle?

Hard to tell.

Quayle actually misspelled a word. The mocking was justified. Harris hasn't misspelled anything. She just happens to be a woman of color.

She happens to be an idiot who has accomplished nothing. She could be white, black, or purple, but she'd still be a twit who is in over her cackling head. Deal with it.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these dumb white a fail up like Quayle, but a black woman has to be five times better to get half the respect.

Look at what happened to Quayle: ceaselessly mocked during his tenure as VP, national joke on television and fodder for Saturday Night Live. I was only in middle school but I remember the schoolyard cracks about Dan Quayle and his misspelling of potato(e). Can't get worse than that.

I suppose it is an interesting debate. Who is dumber? Kamala Harris or Dan Quayle?

Hard to tell.

Quayle actually misspelled a word. The mocking was justified. Harris hasn't misspelled anything. She just happens to be a woman of color.

So you honestly think Harris can’t be critiques because she’s a black woman? Does that really make sense to you? Is that logical? Intelligent? Remotely appropriate?

+1
The PP - and others like her who constantly fall back on "racism" and "victimhood," are neither logical, intelligent, or appropriate. No one's falling for their crap anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these dumb white a fail up like Quayle, but a black woman has to be five times better to get half the respect.

Look at what happened to Quayle: ceaselessly mocked during his tenure as VP, national joke on television and fodder for Saturday Night Live. I was only in middle school but I remember the schoolyard cracks about Dan Quayle and his misspelling of potato(e). Can't get worse than that.

I suppose it is an interesting debate. Who is dumber? Kamala Harris or Dan Quayle?

Hard to tell.

Quayle actually misspelled a word. The mocking was justified. Harris hasn't misspelled anything. She just happens to be a woman of color.

No. She is an incompetent women of color. Condelezza Rice was competent woman of color. When you are good at your job, color of skin is never mentioned. Stop the lazy fall back.

+100
Oh what I would do for Condoleezza Rice to be VP (or President) right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He has a point.

+100
He's absolutely correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Way too much smoke and with even The Times turning on her, it seems to signal something is going to happen very soon. Like January 2022 soon.

Yep. First CNN, now the NYT. But I'm sure it's all "astroturfing," as the LWNJs would have you believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The wonderful wisdom of progressive white men running to the rescue of failing black women.

One really has to laugh at the ironies of our times.

+1
I'm torn between laughing and throwing up. Such performative wokeness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Way too much smoke and with even The Times turning on her, it seems to signal something is going to happen very soon. Like January 2022 soon.

She's getting Cuomo's 9pm chair on CNN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Way too much smoke and with even The Times turning on her, it seems to signal something is going to happen very soon. Like January 2022 soon.

She's getting Cuomo's 9pm chair on CNN.

And Oprah becomes VP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Way too much smoke and with even The Times turning on her, it seems to signal something is going to happen very soon. Like January 2022 soon.

She's getting Cuomo's 9pm chair on CNN.

And Oprah becomes VP.

....Because identity politics demands that it be a female POC. Those are the rules.