new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now it comes out that Max Stier's wife, Florence Yu Pan, was nominated by Obama to the DC Circuit Court, and GOP Senators let that nomination lapse.

Of course, The NY Times didn’t think that was relevant information.

Sorry, but Stiers was well-wired enough to have gotten this allegation attention much, much sooner. Coons' letter did not go until the end of the week that the FBI investigation was restarted. And, please remember, Coons was the one that got Flake to insist on the restart.

This sounds like part of the Dems' plan. They didn't bring forth Ford until after the hearings were over. Then, they reopened the hearings. Then Ford slow walked coming to testify---even though she had been on the East Coast around the time this all came together. Then, at the end of her hearings, they reopened the investigation because of Avenetti's accusations, including Ramirez. Then, at the end of that week, Coons writes the letter--but, the accusations were likely too vague. Then, the Dems start calling for Kavanaugh's impeachment over something similar to Fords' accusations--except this time it is the "witness" who has no corroboration.

The question is: who is writing the script? Katz?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is getting worse and worse. The NYT will never recover from this abomination.
Apparently the authors of the article never even talked to the not victim.
What a own goal from the “worlds greatest newspaper”

NYT = Pravda

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is getting worse and worse. The NYT will never recover from this abomination.
Apparently the authors of the article never even talked to the not victim.
What a own goal from the “worlds greatest newspaper”

Evidently, they never talked to Max Stier either - the former Clinton attorney who made the original accusation (but was not actually present when the alleged incident occurred).

And, one of the authors was a classmate of Kavanaugh and Stier. Go figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting worse and worse. The NYT will never recover from this abomination.
Apparently the authors of the article never even talked to the not victim.
What a own goal from the “worlds greatest newspaper”

Evidently, they never talked to Max Stier either - the former Clinton attorney who made the original accusation (but was not actually present when the alleged incident occurred).

And, one of the authors was a classmate of Kavanaugh and Stier. Go figure.

1. Do we know that Stiers was never interviewed?
2. If not, do we know what he said in his letter? Did he name the "victim?"
3. Do you think that when you report something to the FBI that they come back to you and give you a "follow up" report?
Do you think they tell you who they interviewed and what they said?

Remember, the authors did not talk to Stiers. They talked to two "officials." We don't even know who they were or if they were FBI. It could have been Coons and Feinstein for all we know.

They did talk to Keyser who did not tell them what they wished to hear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's good to see that the new book "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation" is getting thoroughly trashed by Amazon reviewers. A book whose main evidence of Kavanaugh's guilt is the authors' "gut feeling" (about a person/people they've never even met) which trumps the opinions of those in question deserves the negative feedback.

DCUM libs, you need to brigade the comment section and add positive reviews. Maybe that person who looked at their high school journals should go tell that story on Amazon. Like say, 'I went to some gatherings in HS that I don't remember, therefore Kavanaugh is a rapist!' Go, go, go!!!


https://www.amazon.com/Education-Brett-Kavanaugh-Investigation/product-reviews/059308439X/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

+1
The sad thing is, I bet they’ll do just that.

Like the conservatives are doing right now? You’re just a silly impotent joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting worse and worse. The NYT will never recover from this abomination.
Apparently the authors of the article never even talked to the not victim.
What a own goal from the “worlds greatest newspaper”

Evidently, they never talked to Max Stier either - the former Clinton attorney who made the original accusation (but was not actually present when the alleged incident occurred).

And, one of the authors was a classmate of Kavanaugh and Stier. Go figure.

The NYT had become a tabloid.

Seems to be good for business, at least in the short term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting worse and worse. The NYT will never recover from this abomination.
Apparently the authors of the article never even talked to the not victim.
What a own goal from the “worlds greatest newspaper”

Evidently, they never talked to Max Stier either - the former Clinton attorney who made the original accusation (but was not actually present when the alleged incident occurred).

And, one of the authors was a classmate of Kavanaugh and Stier. Go figure.

1. Do we know that Stiers was never interviewed?
2. If not, do we know what he said in his letter? Did he name the "victim?"
3. Do you think that when you report something to the FBI that they come back to you and give you a "follow up" report?
Do you think they tell you who they interviewed and what they said?

Remember, the authors did not talk to Stiers. They talked to two "officials." We don't even know who they were or if they were FBI. It could have been Coons and Feinstein for all we know.

They did talk to Keyser who did not tell them what they wished to hear.

1.

Reporters Kate Kelly and Robin Pogrebin had written a weekend essay for the Times about their new book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,’’ that revealed the accusation. The writers relied on allegations leveled by a man who was at a drunken Yale University dorm party where the incident supposedly happened about 30 years ago. Neither the man, politically connected Democrat Max Stier, nor the alleged victim spoke to the reporters, but the writers said they communicated with people who had.

https://nypost.com/2019/09/17/ny-times-editors-removed-fact-that-kavanaugh-victim-doesnt-recall-incident/

2. As far as I know, Chris Coons is the only person who has seen the letter.

Four days before the U.S. Senate voted to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court last year, Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., tipped off the FBI to a new claim of sexual assault levied against the federal judge.

Revealed to the public in multiple reports on Monday, the claim was at least the third such allegation known to the Delaware senator during the tumultuous months after President Donald Trump nominated Kavanaugh, a conservative, to replace the reliably moderate Anthony Kennedy.

The allegation came from Max Stier, CEO of an influential Washington, D.C., nonprofit, who told Coons he witnessed Kavanaugh expose his penis to a woman during a party at a Yale University dorm in the 1980s.

Through a spokesperson, Stier declined to comment for this story.

Coons, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, found the story to be credible, said Sean Coit, a spokesman for the senator. Asked whether Coons considered publicizing the claim at the time, the spokesman said Stier had "requested confidentiality, which Sen. Coons respected."

https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2019/09/16/coons-learned-third-sexual-assault-allegation-against-kavanaugh-prior-senate-vote/2340220001/

3. That depends. On lots of factors. Usually, no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

Brett’s wife? Is that too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's good to see that the new book "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation" is getting thoroughly trashed by Amazon reviewers. A book whose main evidence of Kavanaugh's guilt is the authors' "gut feeling" (about a person/people they've never even met) which trumps the opinions of those in question deserves the negative feedback.

DCUM libs, you need to brigade the comment section and add positive reviews. Maybe that person who looked at their high school journals should go tell that story on Amazon. Like say, 'I went to some gatherings in HS that I don't remember, therefore Kavanaugh is a rapist!' Go, go, go!!!


https://www.amazon.com/Education-Brett-Kavanaugh-Investigation/product-reviews/059308439X/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

+1
The sad thing is, I bet they’ll do just that.

Like the conservatives are doing right now? You’re just a silly impotent joke.

Know thyself, PP.

[Anonymous]

All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

I did that? REALLY?

Spinderella, breath in and count to ten. Feel your heart rate slow. Chill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

No. That is absolutely not true. You are generalizing a few conspiracy theorists. You have them on your side, as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

No. That is absolutely not true. You are generalizing a few conspiracy theorists. You have them on your side, as well.

No kidding. A few nut jobs vs an entire political party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

Wow, generalize much? I never believed that, much less “pushed” it, and I know no one else who did. You’re taking the actions of a minuscule number of people and extrapolating them onto a huge group. Is this really the best you can do?

Honestly, you people need to learn that the adult thing to do when you’re wrong is simply admit it and move on.