new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

No. That is absolutely not true. You are generalizing a few conspiracy theorists. You have them on your side, as well.

+100
Understatement of the year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

Where is this coming from? Only the biggest idiots would even care what religion Obama is. I could lump everyone believing CBF's story with the idiots who believed Jussie Smollett got lynched by 2 MAGA dudes in -50 degree weather at 2AM in downtown Chicago in a polar vortex while on his way home from Subway but I won't because it's irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

Where is this coming from? Only the biggest idiots would even care what religion Obama is. I could lump everyone believing CBF's story with the idiots who believed Jussie Smollett got lynched by 2 MAGA dudes in -50 degree weather at 2AM in downtown Chicago in a polar vortex while on his way home from Subway but I won't because it's irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

The biggest idiots indeed

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/28/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-birth-certificate-nyt/index.html

We agree on that at least

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/trump-pick-for-treasury-spokesperson-was-an-obama-birther.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Yup, the PP talking about "projection" doesn't even understand the word and uses it incorrectly to defend someone who is not defensible. Kavanaugh sucks whether he committed sexual assault or not. And then PP proceeds to wish that you be falsely accused. What a horrific person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's good to see that the new book "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation" is getting thoroughly trashed by Amazon reviewers. A book whose main evidence of Kavanaugh's guilt is the authors' "gut feeling" (about a person/people they've never even met) which trumps the opinions of those in question deserves the negative feedback.

DCUM libs, you need to brigade the comment section and add positive reviews. Maybe that person who looked at their high school journals should go tell that story on Amazon. Like say, 'I went to some gatherings in HS that I don't remember, therefore Kavanaugh is a rapist!' Go, go, go!!!


https://www.amazon.com/Education-Brett-Kavanaugh-Investigation/product-reviews/059308439X/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

Unlike the conservatives leaving fraudulent reviews, why would I leave a review for a book I haven’t read?

The liberals I know read things and think about them before they post. I have no bizarro "loyalty at all costs" to "liberals" or Democrats. I just happen to find more Democrat lawmakers whose policies I agree with.

Only you drink the Koolaid, weirdo Trumpers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Yup, the PP talking about "projection" doesn't even understand the word and uses it incorrectly to defend someone who is not defensible. Kavanaugh sucks whether he committed sexual assault or not. And then PP proceeds to wish that you be falsely accused. What a horrific person.

PP doesn’t know what “projection” means and just throws it out as an insult because someone called her out on it before.

Poor BK Fan Girl isn’t very bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you holier than thou BK fans relentlessly pushed the lie that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and was (OMG!) a Muslim. You can take your conspiracy theories and sanctimonious rants and shove them up your backsides.

Where is this coming from? Only the biggest idiots would even care what religion Obama is. I could lump everyone believing CBF's story with the idiots who believed Jussie Smollett got lynched by 2 MAGA dudes in -50 degree weather at 2AM in downtown Chicago in a polar vortex while on his way home from Subway but I won't because it's irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

Mic drop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Older female here. I can assure you that if I were accused of a crime such as assault, rape, sodomy, murder, etc. and knew that I was innocent, I would NOT be responding, "I do not remember this incident."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's good to see that the new book "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation" is getting thoroughly trashed by Amazon reviewers. A book whose main evidence of Kavanaugh's guilt is the authors' "gut feeling" (about a person/people they've never even met) which trumps the opinions of those in question deserves the negative feedback.

DCUM libs, you need to brigade the comment section and add positive reviews. Maybe that person who looked at their high school journals should go tell that story on Amazon. Like say, 'I went to some gatherings in HS that I don't remember, therefore Kavanaugh is a rapist!' Go, go, go!!!


https://www.amazon.com/Education-Brett-Kavanaugh-Investigation/product-reviews/059308439X/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

Unlike the conservatives leaving fraudulent reviews, why would I leave a review for a book I haven’t read?

The liberals I know read things and think about them before they post. I have no bizarro "loyalty at all costs" to "liberals" or Democrats. I just happen to find more Democrat lawmakers whose policies I agree with.

Only you drink the Koolaid, weirdo Trumpers.

Yes, you’re a thoughtful lot, aren’t you? You really stopped and gave it some serious thought before reacting when the news reported Jussie Smollett had been “attacked”. Oh, and when Nathan Phillips got in the face of the Covington student, you were quite reflective before spouting off, weren’t you? Such a pensive lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Yup, the PP talking about "projection" doesn't even understand the word and uses it incorrectly to defend someone who is not defensible. Kavanaugh sucks whether he committed sexual assault or not. And then PP proceeds to wish that you be falsely accused. What a horrific person.

Along with the whole Roe vs Wade issue, that bolded comment (your opinion and that of other liberal Democrats) is the underlying reason for the attacks on Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

On the contrary, he acted exactly as I would expect anyone falsely accused would act, including me. Especially when one of those spurious accusations (Julie Swetnik, anybody?) had been lobbed at him either that very morning or the night before. He hadn’t even had time to process before being grilled on national television. I know I’d be furious if I was accused of something I had not done, especially with no evidence and in front of my family and friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Older female here. I can assure you that if I were accused of a crime such as assault, rape, sodomy, murder, etc. and knew that I was innocent, I would NOT be responding, "I do not remember this incident."

Precisely this. Which is why I’d love to see how those critical of his demeanor at the hearing would react in a similar situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Yup, the PP talking about "projection" doesn't even understand the word and uses it incorrectly to defend someone who is not defensible. Kavanaugh sucks whether he committed sexual assault or not. And then PP proceeds to wish that you be falsely accused. What a horrific person.

PP doesn’t know what “projection” means and just throws it out as an insult because someone called her out on it before.

Poor BK Fan Girl isn’t very bright.

Ah yes, the “BK Fan Girl”’ troll is back. So telling that all you can do is use the same idiotic phrase in the hopes of getting under our skin. It’s clear you are exploding with rage because this just isn’t going your way. I cry big tears for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of pps screaming about “Kavanaugh acted perfectly for a man who was falsely accused” and I found a tweet that might translate that kind of craziness to those of us for whom Brett looked insane: “I think the fear is not "she said I raped her and I didn't" but "she said I raped her and I could have."” I think a lot of these insanely defensive PPs who are vociferously defending a man who deserves no such defense are afraid of their own actions in the past.

https://mobile.twitter.com/page88/status/1174333408287318017

Wow. Talk about projection. I hate to say it, but I truly hope you or someone you love is accused of something you did not do. I would love to see how you behave while trying to clear your name. Best of luck.

“Projection” is completely the wrong word to use for your trying to say you disagree. I’m not a rapist and I don’t have any weird checkered sexual past where maybe I pushed or coerced someone into sex. I have a clean conscience.

You on the other hand seem not to understand the tweet I pasted here or what it means for the most vociferous Brett defenders. He didn’t even act like an innocent man wrongly accused, he acted guilty and aggressive. If he were innocent, he should have - as a wannabe justice with connections and resources that most of us can’t dream of, mind you, not five young black man in New York City - said, “I do not remember this incident, I support a full and complete investigation. But he didn’t. He hid behind a shoddy investigation and lashed out.

Yup, the PP talking about "projection" doesn't even understand the word and uses it incorrectly to defend someone who is not defensible. Kavanaugh sucks whether he committed sexual assault or not. And then PP proceeds to wish that you be falsely accused. What a horrific person.

Along with the whole Roe vs Wade issue, that bolded comment (your opinion and that of other liberal Democrats) is the underlying reason for the attacks on Kavanaugh.

Yep. They want him out no matter how low they have to stoop. There seems to be no bottom for them.