YouTube Influencer Myka Stauffer "rehomes" adopted son

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.

Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!

Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.

They failed miserably at this.

I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.

Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.

No it's not, adoption is!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is this person? Why are we supposed to believe what she says about Myka is true? This lady needs to get a life and a real job imo.

Myka needs to get a real job and stop exploiting her children.

Do you say this about the 58373838 other family vloggers out there?

Yes, absolutely. Not only these atrocious vloggers, but also all the wannabe vloggers who exploit their children. It's sickening.

+1. They’re all terrible and exploiting their children for personal gain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

Seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is this person? Why are we supposed to believe what she says about Myka is true? This lady needs to get a life and a real job imo.

Myka needs to get a real job and stop exploiting her children.

Do you say this about the 58373838 other family vloggers out there?

Yes, all those that film and exploit their kids - they all need to be shut down and evaluated as they all seem to home school, have large families, and film everything without kids permission! Too many to mention, but it's exploitation and the kids have to perfom like monkeys!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is this person? Why are we supposed to believe what she says about Myka is true? This lady needs to get a life and a real job imo.

Myka needs to get a real job and stop exploiting her children.

Do you say this about the 58373838 other family vloggers out there?

Yes, absolutely. Not only these atrocious vloggers, but also all the wannabe vloggers who exploit their children. It's sickening.

Yep. Reality tv involving children, mommy blogging, mommy vlogging...it’s all vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

Ummm no. Those posts were from a year ago. She’s not posting looking to adopt another kid right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is this person? Why are we supposed to believe what she says about Myka is true? This lady needs to get a life and a real job imo.

Myka needs to get a real job and stop exploiting her children.

Do you say this about the 58373838 other family vloggers out there?

Yes, all those that film and exploit their kids - they all need to be shut down and evaluated as they all seem to home school, have large families, and film everything without kids permission! Too many to mention, but it's exploitation and the kids have to perfom like monkeys!

LOL but it’ll never happen. And no, they don’t all homeschool and have a million kids. The ones I watch have 2-3 max and the kids go to school. Mid to upper 20s and they make over a million a year easily. As long as people keep watching, they’ll be around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.

Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!

Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.

They failed miserably at this.

I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.

Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.

No it's not, adoption is!

It is called rehoming if a child has been adopted and that family places the child for adoption again, especially in the way they did - family to family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

Most of those would be agency and hopefully she wouldn't be approved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

Most of those would be agency and hopefully she wouldn't be approved.

The posts were from 9+ months ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

Seriously?

Yes, but looking for a child with special needs that was easy to manage, but that most people wouldn’t think was easy. For real.

https://mobile.twitter.com/hannyyy08/status/1266126433803436035/photo/1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced the Stauffers deliberately adopted a special needs kid to make money off of him because I think they've done a good job of convincing themselves that their lifestyle blogging is a valid choice for their family.

But I don't for a minute think that the effect on their lifestyle blog was never considered.

Hopefully the child is better off, but the whole thing is very disturbing. The Reuters story linked from page one makes it clear that the "re-homing"/abandonment process is informal, whereas the adoption process is very formal.

You obviously haven't read her posts on Internet adoption sites looking for another kid to adopt with special needs while in the middle of all this!

Seriously?

Yes, but looking for a child with special needs that was easy to manage, but that most people wouldn’t think was easy. For real.

https://mobile.twitter.com/hannyyy08/status/1266126433803436035/photo/1

Can you not read dates? Myka made those posts almost TWO years ago...

[Anonymous]

An IG page is saying they got proof that Huxley is still in Ohio with a two mom family with a little child. Supposedly Myka has good friends who are a two mom family with a child so people are speculating it may be them.

[Anonymous]

She got dropped by Fabletics. Serves her right. Karma is a b*tch.