Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

I guess the legacy of Charlie Kirk will be "sure, disagree with me, but if you do you'll lose your job"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So posters are suggesting that the CIA hired Robinson to be a hacker and also kill Kirk then left him to rot in jail? I thought cyber operations were out of a different agency but ok. Tell me more of this conspiracy.

Someone else killed Charlie Kirk, not Tyler Robinson.

What makes you think this?

I think we need to see actual evidence of Tyler being the murderer. How do we know he did this? Is there video of him shooting the gun?

Why would there be video of him shooting the gun? He's higher up than any security cameras that would have been in the area.

Then there’s absolutely no proof. Something or someone lured him to the roof for hopes of payment probably, no one ended up being there but he waited. The shot rang out, Charlie was killed, Tyler realized what was happening, realized people saw him on the roof, they would suspect him, he sprinted and jumped off the roof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Probably already posted, but worth posting again if not.

The pastor of the Alfred Street Baptist Church nailed it: https://www.instagram.com/p/DOmYt0QESKu/

He's a race baiting POS. But I'll give him credit for having big balls and putting a huge target on his back.

What specifically do you disagree with that he said? And what do you think should happen to him for exercising his right to free speech?

Do you like this poster’s knee jerk default to a violent threat?

“Target on his back.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Probably already posted, but worth posting again if not.

The pastor of the Alfred Street Baptist Church nailed it: https://www.instagram.com/p/DOmYt0QESKu/

He's a race baiting POS. But I'll give him credit for having big balls and putting a huge target on his back.

This seems like projecting again. The pastor spoke thoughtfully and carefully about the need for compassion. Did Charlie Kirk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Lance and Tyler were this flaming, furry bizarre counterculture couple, they would have left Utah.

+1 This is what I said as soon as Robinson was identified. If he were actually a lefty he would have take his great ACT score and 4.0 GPA and gone anywhere else. For free. Now people are trying to convince us that his one semester at Utah State of all places radicalized him. Come the f*** on.

The shooter went to USU for one semester 3 years ago. He wasn't there long enough to get "indoctrinated" (ie educated and exposed to people of different backgrounds and cultures)

I read that his single semester was online. He spent a few months logging into blackboard, that’s it.

That seems likely given COVID. Lots of kids dropped out then, even ones who would have been successful otherwise. The strong ones got back on track. Many others didn't.

We are seeing the results of the seeds that were planted during Covid. Whatever content people took in when we are all locked in the house has now fruited into a lot of the intense beliefs and online behaviors we see now. We were all chronically online that year, and everyone didn’t come out the same on the other side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a bot.

This guy is beyond weird and belongs in a mental institution.

OR, he's very lucid, very self aware and is a "Community Agitator" with specific aims abd goals.

You know all about community agitators, don't you?

Like Turning Point?

Debating ideas = Agitating?

Tuning point was never about debating ideas. Tuning point was about formatting violence. Read the post here. The Kirk supporters want to kill all the leftists. Who are ten leftists- AOC, Bernie, Schumer, etc. plus anyone in their movement who steps out of line.

I read comments like this on this site and have to chuckle a bit. I am not surprised to read this drivel here. I am not surprised that people who frequent this site really have no understanding of Turning Point or Charlie Kirk.

And, then, I look at the video footage from weekend vigils and services. I see tens of millions of people from all over the world - the US, the UK, Australia, South Korea, and others - celebrating the life of Charlie Kirk and honoring his memory. And, these tens of millions of people know that Charlie Kirk was working to encourage discourse - something the left finds threatening. He was a Christian who believed all people are God's children. That was evident from the manner he treated other people in his debates - not personal - he simply gave his opinons and ideas. He treated people of color, gays, trans people - everyone - with respect even though he may not agree with what they said or believed.

This is yet another issue where the left - especially on this site and the far left media people - are on the 20% side of an 80/20 issue. You are never going to convince anyone of your opinions when it comes to TP or Charlie Kirk because we have thousands of hours of video that show just the opposite. Trying to take his comments out of context or blatantly lying about what he has said falls on deaf ears around the world.

And, his movement will only grow. A fitting tribute to a person who was shot by someone that Charlie Kirk *would have* welcomed debate with, had he been given the chance.

You are completely full of sht. Like how you even type that out it's so ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this kid and the kid who “shot” Trump had been recruited by the same group to cause problems?

Was the person at that golf club also a "kid"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess the legacy of Charlie Kirk will be "sure, disagree with me, but if you do you'll lose your job"

Celebrating an innocent man being murdered isn't just disagreeing with someone. It's disgusting and we should be doing better. These lunatics losing their jobs is a GOOD thing for society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:471 pages and the fact remains that the shooter was a gay leftist. Nothing will change that.

You forgot to say “attributed to his MAGA Mornmon upbringing”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this kid and the kid who “shot” Trump had been recruited by the same group to cause problems?

Was the person at that golf club also a "kid"?

No. He was just your average boomer crazy. I just find there are some similarities between Crooks and Robinson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Probably already posted, but worth posting again if not.

The pastor of the Alfred Street Baptist Church nailed it: https://www.instagram.com/p/DOmYt0QESKu/

He's a race baiting POS. But I'll give him credit for having big balls and putting a huge target on his back.

No one cares what you think.

You do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Lance and Tyler were this flaming, furry bizarre counterculture couple, they would have left Utah.

+1 This is what I said as soon as Robinson was identified. If he were actually a lefty he would have take his great ACT score and 4.0 GPA and gone anywhere else. For free. Now people are trying to convince us that his one semester at Utah State of all places radicalized him. Come the f*** on.

The shooter went to USU for one semester 3 years ago. He wasn't there long enough to get "indoctrinated" (ie educated and exposed to people of different backgrounds and cultures)

I read that his single semester was online. He spent a few months logging into blackboard, that’s it.

That seems likely given COVID. Lots of kids dropped out then, even ones who would have been successful otherwise. The strong ones got back on track. Many others didn't.

We are seeing the results of the seeds that were planted during Covid. Whatever content people took in when we are all locked in the house has now fruited into a lot of the intense beliefs and online behaviors we see now. We were all chronically online that year, and everyone didn’t come out the same on the other side.

That’s when Tyler and Lance started hacking into domestic and foreign govt agencies probably.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So posters are suggesting that the CIA hired Robinson to be a hacker and also kill Kirk then left him to rot in jail? I thought cyber operations were out of a different agency but ok. Tell me more of this conspiracy.

Someone else killed Charlie Kirk, not Tyler Robinson.

What makes you think this?

I think we need to see actual evidence of Tyler being the murderer. How do we know he did this? Is there video of him shooting the gun?

Why would there be video of him shooting the gun? He's higher up than any security cameras that would have been in the area.

Then there’s absolutely no proof. Something or someone lured him to the roof for hopes of payment probably, no one ended up being there but he waited. The shot rang out, Charlie was killed, Tyler realized what was happening, realized people saw him on the roof, they would suspect him, he sprinted and jumped off the roof.

The proof is his own confession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So posters are suggesting that the CIA hired Robinson to be a hacker and also kill Kirk then left him to rot in jail? I thought cyber operations were out of a different agency but ok. Tell me more of this conspiracy.

Someone else killed Charlie Kirk, not Tyler Robinson.

What makes you think this?

I think we need to see actual evidence of Tyler being the murderer. How do we know he did this? Is there video of him shooting the gun?

Why would there be video of him shooting the gun? He's higher up than any security cameras that would have been in the area.

Then there’s absolutely no proof. Something or someone lured him to the roof for hopes of payment probably, no one ended up being there but he waited. The shot rang out, Charlie was killed, Tyler realized what was happening, realized people saw him on the roof, they would suspect him, he sprinted and jumped off the roof.

Is this the new talking point? Where is this coming from? I thought Robinson was trans loving killer who held Far Left beliefs. I thought he was on George Soros' payroll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess the legacy of Charlie Kirk will be "sure, disagree with me, but if you do you'll lose your job"

Celebrating an innocent man being murdered isn't just disagreeing with someone. It's disgusting and we should be doing better. These lunatics losing their jobs is a GOOD thing for society.

Great, now do the people celebrating Biden's cancer.