Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, a Dem comes forward to speak of bravery and courage. LOL. That's all they have. They spend their five minutes on head patting. PRESENT THE DAMN EVIDENCE.

They’re also talking to the rest of us.
SHE’S presenting the evidence.

No, she's telling her side of a story. That's it. That's all.

[Anonymous]

She said hello to her attacker? Not "Mom, that boy sexually assaulted me"?

She did not want her parents to know what happened. She would have been in a world of trouble for drinking with boys in a house with no adults present. She wanted to pretend that it never happened. She detailed all of this

So she greets him? I'm sorry but I would not say "hello how are you to my attacker"

I did. For two long years.

I question your emotional stability for that. Seriously. That's very odd.

And that is exactly why I didn't tell anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Listen to Democrats when they have a turn. They are only going over talking points. They are bringing NOTHING to the table.

What would you like them to ask? No snark here, just curious. Because she's told her story over and over. They need an FBI investigation in order to gather evidence, but that has not been done. What else can they ask?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her, but I agree that she wasn't coached enough. Smiling and talking about google interns, she is not doing herself any favors.

The second front door thing is very chilling though. I understand where she is coming from on that.

Can you explain the second front door significance. I sincerely don't understand.

She states that she was so cumulatively traumatized over the year since the assault, then she essentially wanted an extra escape route, presumably in the event she would be susceptible to another attacker. That's my interpretation.

And, she was so traumatized by this alleged attack, yet she initiated conversation with one of her alleged attackers 6-8 weeks following the attack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

+1,000,000
Well said.

And once more for the people in the back.

How are we supposed to believe the victims when women clearly lie just as often as men? Did you not see the Brian Banks case that was just resolved? He served 6 years in jail for a rape he didn’t commit and had his whole life ruined. That is a good reason to take a step back in these situations I’d say

Women "clearly lie just as often as men" what does that mean? At least 60% of sexual assaults are not even reported. Of the 40% that are, a small percentage are identified as unfounded, of which false allegations are an even more minuscule percentage.

So no, people who report sexual assault (be they women or men) are lying in an incredibly small amount of cases.

Research has also demonstrated that false accusers tend to fit a certain profile as well, once that Ford does not fit. They tend to be young teens coming forward using a false accusation like an "alibi" when they don't want to get into trouble with their parents. They tend to be reports that are filed on behalf of someone, like a parent filing for a young teen. They tend to be people with severe mental illness like schizophrenia and who have trouble distinguishing realities. Etc.

This is interesting. 2/3 the one false accusation I’m aware of.

Nope, nope nope. Try again.

Nope to what? That is what the research shows, on top of the low false accusation rate.

Are you a research scientist? Are you a sociologist? Are you a trauma psychologist? Have a seat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Listen to Democrats when they have a turn. They are only going over talking points. They are bringing NOTHING to the table.

Because the GOP refuses to gather any evidence! Investigate FFS! Call in the FBI! Subpoena Mark Judge!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She said hello to her attacker? Not "Mom, that boy sexually assaulted me"?

She did not want her parents to know what happened. She would have been in a world of trouble for drinking with boys in a house with no adults present. She wanted to pretend that it never happened. She detailed all of this

So she greets him? I'm sorry but I would not say "hello how are you to my attacker"

I did. For two long years.

I question your emotional stability for that. Seriously. That's very odd.

And that is exactly why I didn't tell anyone.

That person is disgusting, and I'm very sorry you had to live through seeing your attacker, and being attacked in the first place. I hope you have been able to find a way to release some of the pain you have experienced.

[Anonymous]

You notice when the Rs speak, they are providing details re: timeline. When Ds speak it's all about the feels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listen to Democrats when they have a turn. They are only going over talking points. They are bringing NOTHING to the table.

Because the GOP refuses to gather any evidence! Investigate FFS! Call in the FBI! Subpoena Mark Judge!

This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You notice when the Rs speak, they are providing details re: timeline. When Ds speak it's all about the feels.

Yep.
Facts vs. feelings. That is how it always is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You notice when the Rs speak, they are providing details re: timeline. When Ds speak it's all about the feels.

Thanks for pointing that out. Have you noticed the feels that the entire country if feeling right now?

[Anonymous]

Why is Grassley shouting?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her, but I agree that she wasn't coached enough. Smiling and talking about google interns, she is not doing herself any favors.

The second front door thing is very chilling though. I understand where she is coming from on that.

Can you explain the second front door significance. I sincerely don't understand.

She states that she was so cumulatively traumatized over the year since the assault, then she essentially wanted an extra escape route, presumably in the event she would be susceptible to another attacker. That's my interpretation.

Thanks. That makes sense. My metoo story involves an abusive boyfriend turned stalker. I have taken pains in each home to keep people from entering, which is why I didn't understand the extra door.

[Anonymous]

We had Mark send a letter! that's just as good as having him subpoena-ed and cross examined!

- Republicans

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listen to Democrats when they have a turn. They are only going over talking points. They are bringing NOTHING to the table.

Because the GOP refuses to gather any evidence! Investigate FFS! Call in the FBI! Subpoena Mark Judge!

The absence of Mark Judge is pretty damning. But Judge did already submit a sworn statement denying the incident.