Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Kavenaugh now being investigated for a SERIES of rape attacks in south Florida area during summer of 1988. Several cold cases being reopened in light of "new suspect" surfacing.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/meeting-on-rapes-degradation-at-notorious-floridas-womens-prison-draws-a-packed-house/ar-BBM9sWV



This guy is a SERIAL RAPIST. I'm sure he's probably done other things we aren't aware of, too. I wouldn't put murder past him, especially if any of his victims ever resisted.

Jeff is not removing this? Wow. It has nothing to do with Kavanaugh at all.

I agree. I reported it. But, still here.

I reported it too. Amazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here a horrifying tidbit that Kavanaugh wrote for the Minnesota Law Review:

http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Kavanaugh_MLR.pdf

These are the proposals listed in his opinion piece:
I. PROVIDE SITTING PRESIDENTS WITH A TEMPORARY DEFERRAL OF CIVIL SUITS AND OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
II. ENSURE PROMPT SENATE VOTES ON EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS
III. STREAMLINE EXECUTIVE BRANCH ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE THAT OFFICIALS IN INDEPENDENT AGENCIES ARE MORE ACCOUNTABLE
IV. RECOGNIZE THAT BOTH THE LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCHES HAVE LEGITIMATE AND SOMETIMES OVERLAPPING ROLES IN WAR AND NATIONAL SECURITY
V. CONSIDER THE POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF A SINGLE, SIX-YEAR PRESIDENTIAL TERM

This was covered during the hearings.

Here is the key part:

"Based on my experience in the White House and the Jus- tice Department, in the independent counsel’s office, in the judicial branch as a law clerk and now a judge, and as a teacher of separation of powers law, I have developed a few specific ideas for alleviating some of the problems we have seen arise over the last sixteen years. I believe these proposals would create a more effective and efficient federal government, consis- tent with the purposes of our Constitution as outlined in the Preamble.22 Fully justifying these ideas would require writing a book—and probably more than one. My goal in this forum is far more modest: to identify problems worthy of additional atten- tion, sketch out some possible solutions, and call for further discussion."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Kavenaugh now being investigated for a SERIES of rape attacks in south Florida area during summer of 1988. Several cold cases being reopened in light of "new suspect" surfacing.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/meeting-on-rapes-degradation-at-notorious-floridas-womens-prison-draws-a-packed-house/ar-BBM9sWV



This guy is a SERIAL RAPIST. I'm sure he's probably done other things we aren't aware of, too. I wouldn't put murder past him, especially if any of his victims ever resisted.

Jeff is not removing this? Wow. It has nothing to do with Kavanaugh at all.

I agree. I reported it. But, still here.

I reported it too. Amazing.

Please. It’s been all of 15 min. Believe it or. It, Jeff is not glued to the site 24/7. He might actually have had to take a leak or is eating breakfast or dropping his kids off at school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here a horrifying tidbit that Kavanaugh wrote for the Minnesota Law Review:

http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Kavanaugh_MLR.pdf

These are the proposals listed in his opinion piece:
I. PROVIDE SITTING PRESIDENTS WITH A TEMPORARY DEFERRAL OF CIVIL SUITS AND OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
II. ENSURE PROMPT SENATE VOTES ON EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS
III. STREAMLINE EXECUTIVE BRANCH ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE THAT OFFICIALS IN INDEPENDENT AGENCIES ARE MORE ACCOUNTABLE
IV. RECOGNIZE THAT BOTH THE LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCHES HAVE LEGITIMATE AND SOMETIMES OVERLAPPING ROLES IN WAR AND NATIONAL SECURITY
V. CONSIDER THE POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF A SINGLE, SIX-YEAR PRESIDENTIAL TERM

This was covered during the hearings.

Here is the key part:

"Based on my experience in the White House and the Jus- tice Department, in the independent counsel’s office, in the judicial branch as a law clerk and now a judge, and as a teacher of separation of powers law, I have developed a few specific ideas for alleviating some of the problems we have seen arise over the last sixteen years. I believe these proposals would create a more effective and efficient federal government, consis- tent with the purposes of our Constitution as outlined in the Preamble.22 Fully justifying these ideas would require writing a book—and probably more than one. My goal in this forum is far more modest: to identify problems worthy of additional atten- tion, sketch out some possible solutions, and call for further discussion."

So, A Modest Proposal, then.

[Anonymous]

You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

[Anonymous]

He’ll get to a floor vote and will be voted down.

[Anonymous]

what time is the hearing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

There is no valid reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

He has provided a statement to the SJC stating that he denies all allegations. Serves the same as a sworn statement.
He HAS cleared it up. You clearly don’t believe him.

[Anonymous]

Justice Thomas [to law clerk]: is my popcorn ready?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

He has provided a statement to the SJC stating that he denies all allegations. Serves the same as a sworn statement.
He HAS cleared it up. You clearly don’t believe him.

But is is not present to be questioned. In light of new details that will emerge today, it seems like Judge's presence would be helpful, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

There is no valid reason. The members of this committee don't need a valid reason to do anything. They are cowards and liars, all of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There obviously needs to be an investigation at this point by the FBI. Like many posters have said, at this point anyone can say anything because the SJC is refusing to treat these allegations with the seriousness that they deserve. And it is backfiring. Seriously I could go out and write a letter accusing Brett Kavanaugh of anything and send it.

Is this a serious comment? WTF do you think the committee staff has been doing, reading a 225 Kavanaugh thread on DCUM?

I think that the committee staff is biased and has its own agenda. The Republicans have an interest in confirming this guy which is not conducive to finding out the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

NP. I don’t understand that. Surely the police can open an investigation based on what they’re seeing and hearing, without a non-police witness “reporting” a crime? Can’t they? If the police read a news report about a gun battle in Bethesda last night, they wouldn’t throw up their hands and say “nothing to do!” until someone called in a report, would they?

There’s more to their failure to act than just “no report.”