What SHOULD Dems do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

I didn’t address it because it’s a nonstarter. New states can only be formed out of existing states with the approval of Congress. What California and Democrats want is irrelevant.

+1

Californians don’t want this anyhow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

Ouch.

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice. The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults.

I love how you try to convince people that only “urbanites” hurl insults. lol

Libt—d anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

Ouch.

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice. The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults.

Agreed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

Ouch.

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice. The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults.

I love how you try to convince people that only “urbanites” hurl insults. lol

Libt—d anyone?

That seems to be the current plan. Red states are allegedly filled with deplorables who cling to their guns and religion. It is they who must change and accept the progressive plans of their betters.

[Anonymous]

“Dense urbanites are losers”? Where is this direct quotation found in the Constitution?

86% of the US population lives in a metro area. (Source: census.gov). That’s a huge swath of the population you’re writing off as “losers”. Sounds like you need to step out of your bubble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Dense urbanites are losers”? Where is this direct quotation found in the Constitution?

86% of the US population lives in a metro area. (Source: census.gov). That’s a huge swath of the population you’re writing off as “losers”. Sounds like you need to step out of your bubble.

DP. Population density is irrelevant. The Founders ensured that we had a representative government, not a pure democracy that could be dominated by densely populated areas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Dense urbanites are losers”? Where is this direct quotation found in the Constitution?

86% of the US population lives in a metro area. (Source: census.gov). That’s a huge swath of the population you’re writing off as “losers”. Sounds like you need to step out of your bubble.

Rural citizens are more import for the nation pound for pound. Faceless masses in the city versus landowners and farmers etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

BS

Rural areas voted for the guy who is bankrupting them and stealing their family land for Pennie’s on the $

Putting kids back to work in win safe factories and warehouse
S for Pennie’s
Women as breeders
Sickening disgusting children now will get polio
Rural voted to collapse the US economy and destroy this clandestine hand us to Putin

King Trump and his sycophants will be raping their babies while they continue to whine about the price of eggs .

Red states tell us Republicans do not govern for any rural Americans



The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

Ouch.

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice. The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Dense urbanites are losers”? Where is this direct quotation found in the Constitution?

86% of the US population lives in a metro area. (Source: census.gov). That’s a huge swath of the population you’re writing off as “losers”. Sounds like you need to step out of your bubble.

Rural citizens are more import for the nation pound for pound. Faceless masses in the city versus landowners and farmers etc.

People in metro areas also own land and have farms, troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Dense urbanites are losers”? Where is this direct quotation found in the Constitution?

86% of the US population lives in a metro area. (Source: census.gov). That’s a huge swath of the population you’re writing off as “losers”. Sounds like you need to step out of your bubble.

DP. Population density is irrelevant. The Founders ensured that we had a representative government, not a pure democracy that could be dominated by densely populated areas.

You literally said “dense urbanites” and now suddenly density is irrelevant?

Keep moving those goalposts. Troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

Ouch.

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice. The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults.

This thread is bonkers. How about we criticize MAGA/GOP for its refusal to change, its hacksaw approach, its veer into authoritarianism?!

Why is it always a Dem problem?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail. It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.

Actually, there is, California can split up. Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington. However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass. Just needs another few states to ratify it. Elections should be decided by people, not land.

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California. If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward. Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have. They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution. "Dense urbanites are losers."

Ouch.

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice. The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults.

This thread is bonkers. How about we criticize MAGA/GOP for its refusal to change, its hacksaw approach, its veer into authoritarianism?!

Why is it always a Dem problem?!

+1000000 Please don’t feed the trolls. They’re here to blame and distract.

[Anonymous]

If we wanted the destruction of America, we’d vote MAGA.

[Anonymous]

“cheat her way into the White House”

Every accusation is a confession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even Obama talked about slashing the federal waste. How rich is that?

It’s cute that Harris is now trying to appear tough on the border to win votes

The election was several months ago.