Reply to What SHOULD Dems do?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What SHOULD Dems do?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
There’s not much Democrats can do about #3, but the others are things they can and should be fighting back against, tooth and nail.  It’s not in their nature to play hardball, but if the party wants to survive, it’s going to have to learn quickly.
[/quote]

Actually, there is, California can split up.  Should be three to six states, like Oregon and Washington.  However, it is the Democrats in charge in California that prevent this.[/quote]

I’d like to see the National Popular Vote compact pass.  Just needs another few states to ratify it.  Elections should be decided by people, not land.[/quote]

You didn't address why Democrats haven't segmented California.  If it's important to you.

The reasoning for it is pretty straight forward.  Look how much solidarity densely populated areas have.  They know what the rules are, and they still fail to reach out and build platforms that rural people want.

The founders wrote it in the constitution.  "Dense urbanites are losers."[/quote]
Ouch.[/quote]

Indeed the founders were wise. The Electoral College and 2 senators from each state give rural areas a voice.  The smart thing to do is for urbanites to adopt policies that appeal broadly. Instead, they hurl insults. [/quote]

I love how you try to convince people that only “urbanites” hurl insults. lol

Libt—d anyone?[/quote]

That seems to be the current plan. Red states are allegedly filled with deplorables who cling to their guns and religion. It is they who must change and accept the progressive plans of their betters. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics