2025 VA Governor's race

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

If the alternative is MAGA, then yes it’s acceptable. Any other questions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

She has denounced the texts multiple times. Get over it.

Spanberger is the best option by far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

As if Republicans are capable of self reflection.

There is no well-informed, moral Republican in 2025.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

This was not “blowing off steam.” The person he was texting gave him several chances to walk back his comments but the fool doubled down. This is a sick person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

If the alternative is MAGA, then yes it’s acceptable. Any other questions?

+1

Miyares has to go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

This was not “blowing off steam.” The person he was texting gave him several chances to walk back his comments but the fool doubled down. This is a sick person.

At least he wasn’t threatening to use his power to send his opponents to the gas chambers. I assume that was all in good fun because it was your guys doing it, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

This was not “blowing off steam.” The person he was texting gave him several chances to walk back his comments but the fool doubled down. This is a sick person.

At least he wasn’t threatening to use his power to send his opponents to the gas chambers. I assume that was all in good fun because it was your guys doing it, right?

I know this is hard for you to understand in your hyper-partisan fishbowl but normal people condemn both statements unequivocally

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

This was not “blowing off steam.” The person he was texting gave him several chances to walk back his comments but the fool doubled down. This is a sick person.

At least he wasn’t threatening to use his power to send his opponents to the gas chambers. I assume that was all in good fun because it was your guys doing it, right?

I know this is hard for you to understand in your hyper-partisan fishbowl but normal people condemn both statements unequivocally

And only Democrats are willing to give up power over it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

Just pointing out that this response was itself and answer to a yes or no question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In normal conversation with normal people, people don’t talk like Spanberger did

Have you even been in a conversation with someone like Sears who’s immediately interrupting you and taking over ever word you say the entire time despite admonishment from bystanders? That’s really far from a normal conversation with normal people and that’s exactly how Sears came across in that debate.

Let’s do a real-world exercise. Ask your spouse or child if imagining your enemies children dying is acceptable but tell them to not respond in a yes or no fashion and use superfluous statements and speak for 1 minute nonstop. See if you get through it without interrupting to ask for a direct answer / clarification on if it’s acceptable or not.

It’s ok to have negative thoughts and to blow off steam. I don’t expect Republicans to understand this, because they have bad thoughts and then instantly set out to shoot people or use the law to brutalize people or get horny from a teen girl and then rape her. It’s why you need religion, because you can’t act morally without fear that a God is watching you at all times. Ya’ll were born without that justice gene that even bonobo chimps have.

But at the end of the day, it really is actions that matter, not thoughts. Or lack of actions, in the case of letting kids get blown to bits in schools every single day.

This was not “blowing off steam.” The person he was texting gave him several chances to walk back his comments but the fool doubled down. This is a sick person.

At least he wasn’t threatening to use his power to send his opponents to the gas chambers. I assume that was all in good fun because it was your guys doing it, right?

I know this is hard for you to understand in your hyper-partisan fishbowl but normal people condemn both statements unequivocally

Our Vice President found that impossible, apparently.

[Anonymous]

I think the Republicans don't have a leg to stand on anymore with regard to text messages - now that the Young Republicans' texts have been leaked. "I love Hitler!"

They referred to Black people as monkeys and “the watermelon people” and mused about putting their political opponents in gas chambers. They talked about raping their enemies and driving them to suicide and lauded Republicans who they believed support slavery.

William Hendrix, the Kansas Young Republicans’ vice chair, used the words “n--ga” and “n--guh,” variations of a racial slur, more than a dozen times in the chat. Bobby Walker, the vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans at the time, referred to rape as “epic.” Peter Giunta, who at the time was chair of the same organization, wrote in a message sent in June that “everyone that votes no is going to the gas chamber.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the Republicans don't have a leg to stand on anymore with regard to text messages - now that the Young Republicans' texts have been leaked. "I love Hitler!"

They referred to Black people as monkeys and “the watermelon people” and mused about putting their political opponents in gas chambers. They talked about raping their enemies and driving them to suicide and lauded Republicans who they believed support slavery.

William Hendrix, the Kansas Young Republicans’ vice chair, used the words “n--ga” and “n--guh,” variations of a racial slur, more than a dozen times in the chat. Bobby Walker, the vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans at the time, referred to rape as “epic.” Peter Giunta, who at the time was chair of the same organization, wrote in a message sent in June that “everyone that votes no is going to the gas chamber.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

As I said, there are no well-informed, moral Republican in 2025.

Republicans are amoral scum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the Republicans don't have a leg to stand on anymore with regard to text messages - now that the Young Republicans' texts have been leaked. "I love Hitler!"

They referred to Black people as monkeys and “the watermelon people” and mused about putting their political opponents in gas chambers. They talked about raping their enemies and driving them to suicide and lauded Republicans who they believed support slavery.

William Hendrix, the Kansas Young Republicans’ vice chair, used the words “n--ga” and “n--guh,” variations of a racial slur, more than a dozen times in the chat. Bobby Walker, the vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans at the time, referred to rape as “epic.” Peter Giunta, who at the time was chair of the same organization, wrote in a message sent in June that “everyone that votes no is going to the gas chamber.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

Nobody should really be blamed for saying anything you can hear on the metro when schools get out.