Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

Unqualified token hire leaves behind trail of devastation and collateral damage.

“Token”

Use coded language much? Say what you want to say.

My statement was as direct and uncoded as they come. I feel the same about white boy Pete, but at least he does not have the propensity to treat staff like shit, so maybe we can send him to make ppt with the interns.

Ordinary people suffer the consequences of the experimental politics of the new power class.

+Many.
These powerful folks are supposed to work for us. Unfortunately lots here think we should work for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1466593931865595904

Oh yeah so many current WH staffers talk to Posobiec.

I wouldn’t be sure of this: the world is both highly connected and weird.

[Anonymous]

She sounds extremely messy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She sounds extremely messy.

She likes it messy

[Anonymous]

Kamala doesn’t like to dive into her briefing books but then yells at staff when she feels underprepared.

How does someone with this behavior get to the top?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala doesn’t like to dive into her briefing books but then yells at staff when she feels underprepared.

How does someone with this behavior get to the top?

It’s really embarrassing for us Jamaicans. We work very hard

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala doesn’t like to dive into her briefing books but then yells at staff when she feels underprepared.

How does someone with this behavior get to the top?

Um……diversity hire. You’re just now discovering that affirmative action has consequences?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala doesn’t like to dive into her briefing books but then yells at staff when she feels underprepared.

How does someone with this behavior get to the top?

This is what happens when you hire someone because of what they are rather than who they are.

[Anonymous]

She’s an empty suit. This is nothing new in politics. She’s been shoved aside and won’t be in the mix in 2024. That said the VP isn’t all that important.

[Anonymous]

So only Kamala Harris is a "mean boss" - no one else in DC or the corporate world. No men.

Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So only Kamala Harris is a "mean boss" - no one else in DC or the corporate world. No men.

Got it.

Subordinates can handle “mean”. Poor leadership shouldn’t be tolerated though. People see she’s a sinking ship, so they get out while they can and their prospects aren’t damaged further.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s an empty suit. This is nothing new in politics. She’s been shoved aside and won’t be in the mix in 2024. That said the VP isn’t all that important.

Just like the show Veep. But what happens if Biden can’t make it through this term?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

Unqualified token hire leaves behind trail of devastation and collateral damage.

“Token”

Use coded language much? Say what you want to say.

DP. Did you speak out when Democrats referred to Tim Scott as a "token"? How about Winsome Sears?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So only Kamala Harris is a "mean boss" - no one else in DC or the corporate world. No men.

Got it.

Um... we've heard about and discussed plenty of "mean" male bosses. Why should Kamala Harris get a pass? Because she's a woman? What happened to equality?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s an empty suit. This is nothing new in politics. She’s been shoved aside and won’t be in the mix in 2024. That said the VP isn’t all that important.

Just like the show Veep. But what happens if Biden can’t make it through this term?