Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How long has Kamala been VP?

This must be what they are talking about:

"The official added that Sanders had worked for President Joe Biden for nearly three years."

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/01/symone-sanders-vice-president-office-523660?nname=playbook&nid=0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000&nrid=0000014e-f116-dd93-ad7f-f91725610000&nlid=630318

[Anonymous]

Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

When the problem is the principle figure, all the pruning in the world will do nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

When the problem is the principle figure, all the pruning in the world will do nothing.

Agreed / titanic is the problem (potus)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How long has Kamala been VP?

Sanders ran Biden’s campaign from the beginning. She ran Bernie’s campaign before that. I assume she’s leaving to run someone else’s campaign, since that’s what she does. Speculation on the Stacey Abrams thread that it’s her, but it could be anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

When the problem is the principle figure, all the pruning in the world will do nothing.

Agreed / titanic is the problem (potus)

He is fine, the rest of the bench are lightweights in comparison. Unfortunately he can’t live forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How long has Kamala been VP?

Sanders ran Biden’s campaign from the beginning. She ran Bernie’s campaign before that. I assume she’s leaving to run someone else’s campaign, since that’s what she does. Speculation on the Stacey Abrams thread that it’s her, but it could be anyone.

She has not run a campaign. She was a staffer/operative on those campaigns. There is probably a lot more to the story anyway, given she never wanted to work for Kamala in the first place and felt slighted by what they offered her. She put her neck and progressive credentials on the line to go work for Joe very early.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

Spin, spin, spin!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1466593931865595904

Oh yeah so many current WH staffers talk to Posobiec.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Didn’t the CNN story mention over two dozen sources? That’s an extraordinarily large number so why single her out? I think it’s much more likely she’s leaving of her own accord exactly because of the turmoil, ineffectiveness and overall cluelessness described in the article.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

Unqualified token hire leaves behind trail of devastation and collateral damage.

“Token”

Use coded language much? Say what you want to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

Unqualified token hire leaves behind trail of devastation and collateral damage.

“Token”

Use coded language much? Say what you want to say.

DP Why would one neee to use coded language when Biden announced on national television that he was going to make a diversity hire? That’s as unambiguous as you can get regarding hiring criteria…..exactly what part didn’t you understand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad Kamala is pruining; going to have a great re boot.

Unqualified token hire leaves behind trail of devastation and collateral damage.

“Token”

Use coded language much? Say what you want to say.

My statement was as direct and uncoded as they come. I feel the same about white boy Pete, but at least he does not have the propensity to treat staff like shit, so maybe we can send him to make ppt with the interns.

Ordinary people suffer the consequences of the experimental politics of the new power class.