Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

The filing didn't include a Grand Jury Foreperson signature, and there is no attorney of record.

Very strange.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The filing didn't include a Grand Jury Foreperson signature, and there is no attorney of record.

Very strange.

It's sloppy. Sloppy is what it is.

Jeez, Durham, can you tell us any more closely that this is performative?

[Anonymous]

Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

Sure sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

In 2024 Mueller will still have zero.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

didn't he just come up with something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

didn't he just come up with something?

Not really, no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The judge on Sussmann’s case was a parter at Covington & Burling LLP and served on the Obama/Biden transition team as an advisor on Justice Department issues. Seems totally fair.

Dying laughing that weird, coincidental linkages between Trump Tower's servers and a dodgy Russian bank's servers are a conspiracy theory, but linkages between Big Law and the Washington elites are something with real teeth.

There's a reason why people pay big bucks to go to a Top 10 law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The judge on Sussmann’s case was a parter at Covington & Burling LLP and served on the Obama/Biden transition team as an advisor on Justice Department issues. Seems totally fair.

Dying laughing that weird, coincidental linkages between Trump Tower's servers and a dodgy Russian bank's servers are a conspiracy theory, but linkages between Big Law and the Washington elites are something with real teeth.

There's a reason why people pay big bucks to go to a Top 10 law school.

Huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

didn't he just come up with something?

Not really, no.

It’s a grand jury indictment. Guessing it means something to the defendant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

didn't he just come up with something?

Not really, no.

It’s a grand jury indictment. Guessing it means something to the defendant.

Well, it sure does. He got fired for it.

For this nonsense. Any sensible person would be pretty disgusted with Durham for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.

In 2024 Durham will come up with something. Right?

didn't he just come up with something?

Not really, no.

It’s a grand jury indictment. Guessing it means something to the defendant.

Well, it sure does. He got fired for it.

For this nonsense. Any sensible person would be pretty disgusted with Durham for this.

Why? Nonpartisan answers only, please.

[Anonymous]

Because it is a weak/thin case at best and isn't core to his mandate. The only reason it was filed was because the statue of limitations expired today. Compare it to the material perjury of Flynn and this guy will get off easy, because there is no case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The judge on Sussmann’s case was a parter at Covington & Burling LLP and served on the Obama/Biden transition team as an advisor on Justice Department issues. Seems totally fair.

Dying laughing that weird, coincidental linkages between Trump Tower's servers and a dodgy Russian bank's servers are a conspiracy theory, but linkages between Big Law and the Washington elites are something with real teeth.

There's a reason why people pay big bucks to go to a Top 10 law school.

Huh?

Correct response, PP. Connected computers doing next to nothing is no matter. BS stories passed to reporters in order to snag the FBI’s interest is corruption, big time.