Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

+1

Where are the grand jury materials from the Mueller investigation? Republicams don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to FACTS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

They did not have the right to store the discussions on a code word server. That's illegal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

They did not have the right to store the discussions on a code word server. That's illegal.

Yeah? Really? You tell me the statute broken and cite case law. You know nothing.

"Code word server" BF roll eyes. Stop reading Daily Kossack.

[Anonymous]

The President of the United States and the Attorney General of the United States are asking a FiveEye country to participate in a conspiracy theory narrative in order to break the back of US Intelligence Agencies.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/amer...lensky-a9181641.html

“One British official w/ knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented: 'It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services.’”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

When they are illegally classified as top secret and illegally placed on a server when they are the subject of an impeachment investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

Because these discussions are named as presidential records by the Presidential Records Acts. They aren't necessarily required to be provided on demand, although the FOIA is likely applicable in many cases. But it does mean that no president has a right to say that the substance of conversations between world leaders are private. That is false. This information belongs to the U.S. government and Trump and his staff are required to preserve these records and make them available publicly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The President of the United States and the Attorney General of the United States are asking a FiveEye country to participate in a conspiracy theory narrative in order to break the back of US Intelligence Agencies.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/amer...lensky-a9181641.html

“One British official w/ knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented: 'It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services.’”

Who benefits when the US Intel Community is degraded?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

Because these discussions are named as presidential records by the Presidential Records Acts. They aren't necessarily required to be provided on demand, although the FOIA is likely applicable in many cases. But it does mean that no president has a right to say that the substance of conversations between world leaders are private. That is false. This information belongs to the U.S. government and Trump and his staff are required to preserve these records and make them available publicly.

You're obviously oblivious to how much power EVERY president has had. BTW, what do the records say about Obama's whereabouts whilst assault on Benghazi was taking place and astand down was ordered? Is that little fact in NARA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

Because these discussions are named as presidential records by the Presidential Records Acts. They aren't necessarily required to be provided on demand, although the FOIA is likely applicable in many cases. But it does mean that no president has a right to say that the substance of conversations between world leaders are private. That is false. This information belongs to the U.S. government and Trump and his staff are required to preserve these records and make them available publicly.

You're obviously oblivious to how much power EVERY president has had. BTW, what do the records say about Obama's whereabouts whilst assault on Benghazi was taking place and astand down was ordered? Is that little fact in NARA?

Gee, why didn't Trey Gowdy find that out during the first, second, third, or fourth round of Benghazi hearings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

Because these discussions are named as presidential records by the Presidential Records Acts. They aren't necessarily required to be provided on demand, although the FOIA is likely applicable in many cases. But it does mean that no president has a right to say that the substance of conversations between world leaders are private. That is false. This information belongs to the U.S. government and Trump and his staff are required to preserve these records and make them available publicly.

You're obviously oblivious to how much power EVERY president has had. BTW, what do the records say about Obama's whereabouts whilst assault on Benghazi was taking place and astand down was ordered? Is that little fact in NARA?

Didn't you read the reports done in the 5,000,000 Benghazi investigations? There was NO "stand down order."
You know, if you guys knew the actual facts about things, your outlook would probably be different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm.....discrediting the investigators? Isn’t that what Republicans are trying to do to take the conversation away from the FACTS that are coming out about Trump and his cronies?

Facts? What facts?

Thanks to Schiff's and Pelosi's secret little star chamber hearings, we don't know much in the way of FACTS. Only what Schiff has leaked. And, of course, he will leak nothing that is at all positive for Trump.

And, we don't have to discredit Schiff, who has dubbed himself as "investigator" for this farce. He has discredited himself. Many times over.

Facts being hidden, like illegally locked away on an NSA server? Or how about Trump's taxes, or Trump's transcripts? All of the subpoena'd documents which have been illegally shielded from the public.

You act like you have a right to discussions between presidents and leaders of foreign countries. Would you like that right for all administrations from here forward? It is a ridiculous idea.

We do have that right. Trump works for us. Also, the Presidential Records Act is a law that specifically address this issue:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

Where in this act does it state that you have the right to records of discussions between the president and leaders from other countries on demand?

Because these discussions are named as presidential records by the Presidential Records Acts. They aren't necessarily required to be provided on demand, although the FOIA is likely applicable in many cases. But it does mean that no president has a right to say that the substance of conversations between world leaders are private. That is false. This information belongs to the U.S. government and Trump and his staff are required to preserve these records and make them available publicly.

You're obviously oblivious to how much power EVERY president has had. BTW, what do the records say about Obama's whereabouts whilst assault on Benghazi was taking place and astand down was ordered? Is that little fact in NARA?

Only facts count as historical records. If you are concerned about Benghazi I suggest you do some research. I'm more concerned with how the actions of our current president affect our country.

[Anonymous]

You're obviously oblivious to how much power EVERY president has had. BTW, what do the records say about Obama's whereabouts whilst assault on Benghazi was taking place and astand down was ordered? Is that little fact in NARA?

Gee, why didn't Trey Gowdy find that out during the first, second, third, or fourth round of Benghazi hearings?
PP you have been schooled. Give it up.