Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

It was a tip, no different than calling a top line. Remember, see something, say something? Sussman said something. That was it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

It was a tip, no different than calling a top line. Remember, see something, say something? Sussman said something. That was it.

And this is something to remember. If you give them a tip, in 6 years, you might get charged with lying to the FBI. So think carefully before giving the FBI a tip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

You are assuming, first, that the info was false and, second that Sussman knew it was false. Neither of which is true. And we want folks to pass on tips to the FBI. The FBI can figure whether they have any merit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

It was a tip, no different than calling a top line. Remember, see something, say something? Sussman said something. That was it.

And this is something to remember. If you give them a tip, in 6 years, you might get charged with lying to the FBI. So think carefully before giving the FBI a tip.

Which is the point. That has always been the point.
The republicans have been looking to persecute, prosecute, and punish anyone who attempts to expose or stop their criming.
That’s all this is.
I can only assume Garland is letting this move forward because it shows how craven the Barr DOJ was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

It was a tip, no different than calling a top line. Remember, see something, say something? Sussman said something. That was it.

And this is something to remember. If you give them a tip, in 6 years, you might get charged with lying to the FBI. So think carefully before giving the FBI a tip.

Which is the point. That has always been the point.
The republicans have been looking to persecute, prosecute, and punish anyone who attempts to expose or stop their criming.
That’s all this is.
I can only assume Garland is letting this move forward because it shows how craven the Barr DOJ was.

You have got to be f'ing kidding me.

A tip? A tip that the tipster knew was BS? A tip coming from the opposing campaign as a false flag to open a bogus investigation?
This tip was given for one reason - to get some false dirt out in the media to damage Trump. And, the FBI was sent on a wild goose chase for 3 years because of a "tip."
You people are shameless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

It was a tip, no different than calling a top line. Remember, see something, say something? Sussman said something. That was it.

And this is something to remember. If you give them a tip, in 6 years, you might get charged with lying to the FBI. So think carefully before giving the FBI a tip.

Which is the point. That has always been the point.
The republicans have been looking to persecute, prosecute, and punish anyone who attempts to expose or stop their criming.
That’s all this is.
I can only assume Garland is letting this move forward because it shows how craven the Barr DOJ was.

You have got to be f'ing kidding me.

A tip? A tip that the tipster knew was BS? A tip coming from the opposing campaign as a false flag to open a bogus investigation?
This tip was given for one reason - to get some false dirt out in the media to damage Trump. And, the FBI was sent on a wild goose chase for 3 years because of a "tip."
You people are shameless.

The tip wasn't bs. It was a tip.

This is what is known as a process crime, which Rs usually dislike, and this particular one is unsupported and possibly unsupportable, since the only FBI person who received the tip is already on record as not knowing or remembering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

Except that's nonsense.

The Alfa Bank stuff was very strange. Provocative. Came to nothing after significant government and private investigation. That's not fake.

Take a look at the indictment. More to come

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interesting bits: tech company bigwig colluding with Sussman via email (along with a large corporate exec) to deliberately falsify the bank/Russia/Trump link. Oh, emails also included many media employees.

It was a tip, no different than calling a top line. Remember, see something, say something? Sussman said something. That was it.

I believe that Durham has emails.

[Anonymous]

From the Sussmann indictment:

"...you do realize that we will have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make a very weak association?"

"The only thing that drives us at this point is that we just do not like [Trump]. This will not fly in eyes of public scrutiny."

[Anonymous]

Another Swamp Creature.....

[Anonymous]

The judge on Sussmann’s case was a parter at Covington & Burling LLP and served on the Obama/Biden transition team as an advisor on Justice Department issues. Seems totally fair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The judge on Sussmann’s case was a parter at Covington & Burling LLP and served on the Obama/Biden transition team as an advisor on Justice Department issues. Seems totally fair.

You're aware that both Durham and Sussman are former federal prosecutors. Right?

How unfair!

[Anonymous]

https://www.justsecurity.org/75032/litigation-tracker-pending-criminal-and-civil-cases-against-donald-trump/

[Anonymous]

Bloomberg reports that the creditor who gave Trump a massive $100 million loan (using his New York Trump Tower as collateral) just put the loan on a “debt watchlist” because the flagship Fifth Avenue building is going broke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The judge on Sussmann’s case was a parter at Covington & Burling LLP and served on the Obama/Biden transition team as an advisor on Justice Department issues. Seems totally fair.

You do realize that the Obama/Biden folks never liked Hillary. This sounds like a setup to further shove her out of the way.