Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's doing fine, certainly no worse than any other modern VP.

Anyone suggesting otherwise has unrealistic standards or is simply a racist.

Ahh right, any criticism of Harris must be motivated by racial animus. Are people really this unintelligent?

Well, when she is being criticized for buying a $300 cooking pot at the expense of billions of dollars of grift and waste from the previous administration, yes.

Honestly the first thing I thought about Harris being in Paris was that I hope she gets a chance to go shopping. A ply is fine but I woukd have gone for scarves, gloves, shoes, and sweaters.

Yep! I actually think it helps her polling and that’s why the republicans are spinning it. She should go out more

I would rather her visit the southern border and actually talk to some of the border agents and land owners.
It would open her eyes.

That sounds an awful lot like work.

+1
Why go to our southern border when you can jet off to Paris?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why do you think that? She's the VICE President. A VP is never meant to outshine the Commander-in-Chief. Biden spends most of his time in Delaware or not taking live briefings. His administration is accomplishing great things. The VP has his full support behind the scenes and vice versa. But putting her on stage in a stadium with floodlights would do nothing but highlight how 'quiet' Biden is.

Her job is to be his support, be ready if he needs her to make decisions for the country, and if necessary - take criticism for him. That's it.

This is a flat out lie. He has spent a total of like 7 days in Delaware. Contrast that with the hundreds of days of golf and shacking up in Mar-A-Lago or NJ from the previous president.

if you truly believe he has spent too much time in Delaware, then you clearly were not paying attention to the last 4 years.

Wrong. I'm a Biden supporter and even I've noted how long he's stayed in Delaware. The thing is - I don't care. Its faster to get to parts of Delaware than it is to get to Camp David - so what does it matter.

He's there basically every other weekend.

A CNN analysis of Biden’s public schedule indicates the President has spent a significant amount of time away from the White House, particularly on weekends, since his January inauguration. Including this weekend’s trip to Delaware, Biden has taken 35 personal trips and spent all or part of 108 of his first 276 days in office at one of his Delaware homes or at Camp David in Maryland. That includes partial days, like Friday — when he spent the day at the White House and departed in the evening.

Sixty-nine of those 108 days away from Washington were spent at his home in Wilmington, spread over 23 visits; seven days at his Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, beach house over two visits; and 32 days at Camp David over 10 visits.

This doesn't fit the "whatabout Trump!?!?" narrative. Can't have that.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Unreal. And yet, all too real. This is the knee-jerk response of Democrats whenever they're sure one of their own has been "wronged." Never stopping to wait for facts. Just go straight to the outrage.

[Anonymous]

Trending...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trending...

Stacey Abrams here we come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trending...

Stacey Abrams here we come.

Who knows who comes next? Kamala's strengths are almost entirely in the demographics where the Democrats have a surfeit of votes. Do you think offending the K-Hive by jettisoning Kamala will make them vote for Trump? Even if they stay home en masse, it might be worth it to do a better job appealing outside of the Democrats' base.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unreal. And yet, all too real. This is the knee-jerk response of Democrats whenever they're sure one of their own has been "wronged." Never stopping to wait for facts. Just go straight to the outrage.

She’s disgusting…..so eager to stir racial tensions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unreal. And yet, all too real. This is the knee-jerk response of Democrats whenever they're sure one of their own has been "wronged." Never stopping to wait for facts. Just go straight to the outrage.

She’s disgusting…..so eager to stir racial tensions.

Give me a break. You make that up in your mind? I'm not a fan, but there's nothing disgusting about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trending...

Stacey Abrams here we come.

LOL!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unreal. And yet, all too real. This is the knee-jerk response of Democrats whenever they're sure one of their own has been "wronged." Never stopping to wait for facts. Just go straight to the outrage.

She’s disgusting…..so eager to stir racial tensions.

Give me a break. You make that up in your mind? I'm not a fan, but there's nothing disgusting about her.

DP. On the contrary - there is something very disgusting about anyone who jumps on the outrage bandwagon before knowing any actual facts, merely because it furthers a political narrative.

[Anonymous]

!! what is going on??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:!! what is going on??

Rats, sinking ship.

[Anonymous]

Ruh roh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

How long has Kamala been VP?