
What name-calling? I didn’t call anyone a name - and neither did this girl. |
No, she was told that she would either withdraw or they would rescind her admission. She's will likely have some difficulty attaining a spot at another four-year university any time in the near future due to this incident + she has been publicly outed and shamed which may well affect future employment prospects. Her trajectory has changed, at least for the next few years years, possibly beyond. |
![]() You’re obviously seeing what you want to see through the lens of your fevered imagination. So pathetic. |
This. What university will want to accept her now, thanks to the smear machine that this idiot kid put in motion? |
+1. There are some posters on this thread that are very fearful of POC (fueled by stereotypes) and what the future holds regarding their perceived privilege. |
DP. You seem confused. No one here is trying to cancel him. We’re merely pointing out how his behavior will take care of that for him. Actions have consequences, as I’m sure you’d agree. |
All the more reason to NOT USE A RACIST WORD THAT YOU KNOW YOU SHOULDN’T. |
pp here-- I'm not agreeing that this was a "smear machine" - she indisputably said what she said so it can't really be a smear campaign...but to say that she will be okay, be able to move on, or that this won't permanently damage her life and prospects is simply not true...but if so many white people are up in arms that the punishment doesn't fit the crime, then maybe we need to consider how we treat *all* children. |
If someone speaks to directly to their own negative experiences, that isn’t a stereotype unless it is extended to an entire class of people. Nor is an assessment of the young man’s behavior in this particular instance a stereotype. It’s just a judgment, which may or may not be warranted given the age of both of the individuals involved. If anything, I see far more stereotypes coming from people assuming to judge the motives or beliefs of those who are sympathetic to a girl having her future totally upended based on one stupid comment made when she was 15. |
"I think what you're hearing/seeing is fear. People are realizing that a girl, who made a mistake at a young age when many, many kids make mistakes is paying for in a spectacularly public and life-altering manner. That her accomplishments, character, and work ethic are essentially meaningless at this point in her life, because of this one mistake. "
+1 And i'll agree that most transgressions kids make should not have spectacularly public & life-altering penalties attached to them. Violent actions need to be punished in a way that does not allow the person being hurt to continue being hurt moving forward. But aside from that, penalties for dumb sh-t kids do should be 95% in the moment - grounding, detention, suspension from an extra-curricular for X days/weeks - not on the order of magnitude of what has happened to this girl for literally a single really stupid (and wrong) thing she did 3 years ago when a freshman in HS. |
I don’t know if the girl is racist. I think she’s facing a disproportionate response, the way poor and/or kids of color face disproportionate consequences every day, without rich white parents to cushion their fall. It’s a shame, but what has happened has happened. |
Go read every single comment. |
Most posters here. On DCUM. A site containing the most privileged who think making $150k means you’re poor. Society has already showed who they support and it isn’t her. Hence why she had to withdraw from school. |
Society is a bit larger than the UT admissions office. The bulk of opinion since this Times article has been published is of the view that the girl was callous, the boy came out looking worse because he was manipulative and vindictive, and the university over-reacted. |
That’s the times- a lot of the commenters here have a berserk, empathy-free view of the young man, like he should be shunned and never recover for being an angry jerk in high school. It’s a little weird. |