2024 JonBenet Documentary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?

Another big one. John did, and the knots.

So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.

The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?

Another big one. John did, and the knots.

So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.

The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.

And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?

Another big one. John did, and the knots.

So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.

The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.

And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.

I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.

This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?

Another big one. John did, and the knots.

So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.

The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.

And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.

I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.

This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone

You don’t stage a bludgeoning and strangulation. That is what happened. Staging is like taking a body where someone drowned and put a gun in their hand to make it look like they shot themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?

Another big one. John did, and the knots.

So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.

The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.

And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.

I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.

This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone

You don’t stage a bludgeoning and strangulation. That is what happened. Staging is like taking a body where someone drowned and put a gun in their hand to make it look like they shot themselves.

Yeah, so, nobody said that. What was staged appears to be: the underwear and the wiping down, the duct tape applied after death, the loose hand ties, the note that served no purpose given the fact that the girl was dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?

Another big one. John did, and the knots.

So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.

The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.

And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.

I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.

This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone

You don’t stage a bludgeoning and strangulation. That is what happened. Staging is like taking a body where someone drowned and put a gun in their hand to make it look like they shot themselves.

Yeah, so, nobody said that. What was staged appears to be: the underwear and the wiping down, the duct tape applied after death, the loose hand ties, the note that served no purpose given the fact that the girl was dead.

Which changes nothing so why bother?

[Anonymous]

Wow. Did any of you actually watch the cold case documentary? The parents and Burke did not do this. The case is bizarre but it’s not the parents. I feel like it’s eye opening in the same way as the Menendez case is now. Earlier opinions tainted by smearing and leaks intended to paint these folks as killers. Watch it and then follow up. John wasn’t paid for it, didn’t ask for edit of it and was very cooperative.
The experts didn’t all conclude it was family! Actually the best FBI profilers and most experienced investigators like Lou Smit and John Douglas concluded it’s an intruder. Hopefully more sophisticated DNA tests will be taken and some previously investigated suspects could be tied in with that to find out who did this.

[Anonymous]

As in any case, I trust the grand jury most of all. And they wanted to charge the parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As in any case, I trust the grand jury most of all. And they wanted to charge the parents.

I wish they'd unseal that indictment. Apparently that's been done in other cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As in any case, I trust the grand jury most of all. And they wanted to charge the parents.

Well, they wanted to charge the parents with endangerment of a minor and of assisting with covering up the crime. They did not indict them for killing her. The grand jury indictment means they thought Burke did it, parents hadn’t protected jonbenet from his ongoing abuse, and the parents ultimately covered up her murder.

[Anonymous]

Cryil says that in this video. He was one of the best Forensic Pathologist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVUTBaO71WM


I couldn’t get past about the first 90 seconds of this insanity. Oh the misogyny - this guy’s theory is that Patsy was out of commission because of cancer treatment and so John needed a sexual surrogate, so he started sexually abusing his daughter. This was sexual play on the part of John that got out of hand.

Heed the message, ladies, you deny your husband sex, rather for chemotherapy or any other reason, and they will rape your toddler.

This is so ridiculous. It doesn’t align with any history for John. This kind of pedophilia that was described would not be something that just started in the last year or two when a husband is not able to have sex with his wife. This is the work of a deranged pedophile who has had a history of issues.

Acting as if John was just sexually frustrated so decided to become a sadistic pedophile… That is insane work.

Finally, a voice of reason!!!

[Anonymous]

Has anyone listened to this podcast?

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-normal-family-the-jonbenet-ramsey-case-revisited/id1595257813

I was firmly in the “Burke did it” camp until I listened to this. They convinced me that Patsy did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone listened to this podcast?

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-normal-family-the-jonbenet-ramsey-case-revisited/id1595257813

I was firmly in the “Burke did it” camp until I listened to this. They convinced me that Patsy did it.

You wanna distill the 8 hours?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone listened to this podcast?

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-normal-family-the-jonbenet-ramsey-case-revisited/id1595257813

I was firmly in the “Burke did it” camp until I listened to this. They convinced me that Patsy did it.

True crime podcasts, streaming shows, and books have to be entertaining and “hook” an audience with outlandish spin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Did any of you actually watch the cold case documentary? The parents and Burke did not do this. The case is bizarre but it’s not the parents. I feel like it’s eye opening in the same way as the Menendez case is now. Earlier opinions tainted by smearing and leaks intended to paint these folks as killers. Watch it and then follow up. John wasn’t paid for it, didn’t ask for edit of it and was very cooperative.
The experts didn’t all conclude it was family! Actually the best FBI profilers and most experienced investigators like Lou Smit and John Douglas concluded it’s an intruder. Hopefully more sophisticated DNA tests will be taken and some previously investigated suspects could be tied in with that to find out who did this.

Even if you believe an intruder did this, how do you explain the ransom note written on Patsy’s legal pad with her handwriting and speech?

What home intruder kills a little girl and then decides to hang around and write a ransom note before disappearing into the Christmas night?