The cruelty and misogyny of forced birth politics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We haven't had any abortion laws at all here in Canada for 30 years and the sky hasn't fallen. It it considered a medical procedure decided on between a woman and her doctor and nobody else's business.

This is why we can’t take you unequivocally pro abortion people seriously. It’s the man’s business too — if as the man want to keep the baby I should be able to. In addition, if I as a man don’t want to pay for the baby but the woman wants to keep it, I should have to. Men should have the same rights as women in the matter otherwise women have all the rights, men have none, and the baby that you murdered has none.

Okay, hun. As soon as the fetus can be transferred to your body to carry you go for it.

LOL we all know you would never in a million years agree to lend your body for 9 months to gestate a pregnancy.

Agreed.
No more ending the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother.

You can choose not to end the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother. I might choose otherwise.

Precisely! It’s ALL about ending the life of the fetus, not about “my body, my choice”.

It’s important to be honest, and you deserve a huge - Thank You! - for your honesty here.

If you care to listen to the science, the fetus doesn’t need its biomother very long at all. So WHY kill it when SO many women are longing to become mothers?

That’s just plain mean and ANTI-feminist! …to deny another woman the opportunity to mother your unwanted fetus.

Troll. No one would actually think this.

^ See what happens to people who stay stuck in their tiny bubble? They have no clue how the rest of the world may be thinking.
I’m the poster who said it’s plain mean and ANTI-feminist to deny another WOMAN the opportunity to mother your viable UNWANTED fetus.

Again, if in fact abortion supporters are truly serious about “my body, my choice”, why not simply allow a viable fetus to be cared for and loved by another WOMAN who is unable to have her own biological child? What’s to be gained by terminating the life of a tiny healthy human being who is perfectly viable?

Most women do not actually WANT to abort the little life they have conceived. They just feel like they had no other option under their circumstances at the time. Women DESERVE options. You should support that.

How many time does this bear repeating. I REFUSE TO BE A FREE SURROGATE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We haven't had any abortion laws at all here in Canada for 30 years and the sky hasn't fallen. It it considered a medical procedure decided on between a woman and her doctor and nobody else's business.

This is why we can’t take you unequivocally pro abortion people seriously. It’s the man’s business too — if as the man want to keep the baby I should be able to. In addition, if I as a man don’t want to pay for the baby but the woman wants to keep it, I should have to. Men should have the same rights as women in the matter otherwise women have all the rights, men have none, and the baby that you murdered has none.

Okay, hun. As soon as the fetus can be transferred to your body to carry you go for it.

LOL we all know you would never in a million years agree to lend your body for 9 months to gestate a pregnancy.

Agreed.
No more ending the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother.

You can choose not to end the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother. I might choose otherwise.

Precisely! It’s ALL about ending the life of the fetus, not about “my body, my choice”.

It’s important to be honest, and you deserve a huge - Thank You! - for your honesty here.

If you care to listen to the science, the fetus doesn’t need its biomother very long at all. So WHY kill it when SO many women are longing to become mothers?

That’s just plain mean and ANTI-feminist! …to deny another woman the opportunity to mother your unwanted fetus.

Troll. No one would actually think this.

^ See what happens to people who stay stuck in their tiny bubble? They have no clue how the rest of the world may be thinking.
I’m the poster who said it’s plain mean and ANTI-feminist to deny another WOMAN the opportunity to mother your viable UNWANTED fetus.

Again, if in fact abortion supporters are truly serious about “my body, my choice”, why not simply allow a viable fetus to be cared for and loved by another WOMAN who is unable to have her own biological child? What’s to be gained by terminating the life of a tiny healthy human being who is perfectly viable?

Most women do not actually WANT to abort the little life they have conceived. They just feel like they had no other option under their circumstances at the time. Women DESERVE options. You should support that.

Like I said. Troll. No one thinks this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We haven't had any abortion laws at all here in Canada for 30 years and the sky hasn't fallen. It it considered a medical procedure decided on between a woman and her doctor and nobody else's business.

This is why we can’t take you unequivocally pro abortion people seriously. It’s the man’s business too — if as the man want to keep the baby I should be able to. In addition, if I as a man don’t want to pay for the baby but the woman wants to keep it, I should have to. Men should have the same rights as women in the matter otherwise women have all the rights, men have none, and the baby that you murdered has none.

Okay, hun. As soon as the fetus can be transferred to your body to carry you go for it.

LOL we all know you would never in a million years agree to lend your body for 9 months to gestate a pregnancy.

Agreed.
No more ending the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother.

You can choose not to end the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother. I might choose otherwise.

Precisely! It’s ALL about ending the life of the fetus, not about “my body, my choice”.

It’s important to be honest, and you deserve a huge - Thank You! - for your honesty here.

If you care to listen to the science, the fetus doesn’t need its biomother very long at all. So WHY kill it when SO many women are longing to become mothers?

That’s just plain mean and ANTI-feminist! …to deny another woman the opportunity to mother your unwanted fetus.

I’m not a free surrogate. No thanks. If I wanted to be a surrogate I’d choose to be and command tens of thousands of dollars in exchange.

No one said the infertile parents wouldn’t pay you for your trouble. Many of them can afford to pay you quite a bit. You’d also be SAVING yourself $$$$ by not having to pay the abortionist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We haven't had any abortion laws at all here in Canada for 30 years and the sky hasn't fallen. It it considered a medical procedure decided on between a woman and her doctor and nobody else's business.

This is why we can’t take you unequivocally pro abortion people seriously. It’s the man’s business too — if as the man want to keep the baby I should be able to. In addition, if I as a man don’t want to pay for the baby but the woman wants to keep it, I should have to. Men should have the same rights as women in the matter otherwise women have all the rights, men have none, and the baby that you murdered has none.

Okay, hun. As soon as the fetus can be transferred to your body to carry you go for it.

LOL we all know you would never in a million years agree to lend your body for 9 months to gestate a pregnancy.

Agreed.
No more ending the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother.

You can choose not to end the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother. I might choose otherwise.

Precisely! It’s ALL about ending the life of the fetus, not about “my body, my choice”.

It’s important to be honest, and you deserve a huge - Thank You! - for your honesty here.

If you care to listen to the science, the fetus doesn’t need its biomother very long at all. So WHY kill it when SO many women are longing to become mothers?

That’s just plain mean and ANTI-feminist! …to deny another woman the opportunity to mother your unwanted fetus.

Troll. No one would actually think this.

^ See what happens to people who stay stuck in their tiny bubble? They have no clue how the rest of the world may be thinking.
I’m the poster who said it’s plain mean and ANTI-feminist to deny another WOMAN the opportunity to mother your viable UNWANTED fetus.

Again, if in fact abortion supporters are truly serious about “my body, my choice”, why not simply allow a viable fetus to be cared for and loved by another WOMAN who is unable to have her own biological child? What’s to be gained by terminating the life of a tiny healthy human being who is perfectly viable?

Most women do not actually WANT to abort the little life they have conceived. They just feel like they had no other option under their circumstances at the time. Women DESERVE options. You should support that.

How on earth do you define feminism if it’s anti feminist for fertile women to decide not to be incubators for the infertile? Or to give their offspring away?

[Anonymous]

You were ALREADY an “incubator” up until the day you go get your abortion, no?
If it’s viable, why not allow her to continue her life? Why terminate the life of a viable little girl (or boy)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You were ALREADY an “incubator” up until the day you go get your abortion, no?
If it’s viable, why not allow her to continue her life? Why terminate the life of a viable little girl (or boy)?

Because I didn’t want to remain pregnant and give birth. Not at any price. And you’re assuming that the baby’s father would agree to this surrogacy/adoption plan.

[Anonymous]

When the baby is already viable, you don’t need to “remain” pregnant. You are no longer needed. So why kill the baby?

[Anonymous]

Until every foster kid has a home, the “but what about adoption” crowd should shut up. They only want white newborns. That’s not pro-life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We haven't had any abortion laws at all here in Canada for 30 years and the sky hasn't fallen. It it considered a medical procedure decided on between a woman and her doctor and nobody else's business.

This is why we can’t take you unequivocally pro abortion people seriously. It’s the man’s business too — if as the man want to keep the baby I should be able to. In addition, if I as a man don’t want to pay for the baby but the woman wants to keep it, I should have to. Men should have the same rights as women in the matter otherwise women have all the rights, men have none, and the baby that you murdered has none.

Okay, hun. As soon as the fetus can be transferred to your body to carry you go for it.

LOL we all know you would never in a million years agree to lend your body for 9 months to gestate a pregnancy.

Agreed.
No more ending the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother.

You can choose not to end the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother. I might choose otherwise.

Precisely! It’s ALL about ending the life of the fetus, not about “my body, my choice”.

It’s important to be honest, and you deserve a huge - Thank You! - for your honesty here.

If you care to listen to the science, the fetus doesn’t need its biomother very long at all. So WHY kill it when SO many women are longing to become mothers?

That’s just plain mean and ANTI-feminist! …to deny another woman the opportunity to mother your unwanted fetus.

I’m not a free surrogate. No thanks. If I wanted to be a surrogate I’d choose to be and command tens of thousands of dollars in exchange.

No one said the infertile parents wouldn’t pay you for your trouble. Many of them can afford to pay you quite a bit. You’d also be SAVING yourself $$$$ by not having to pay the abortionist.

LOL

Pregnancy clothes. Missed work because of feeling ill. Prenatal appointments. Hospital L&D. Missed work after giving birth.

PP has clearly never been pregnant or given birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We haven't had any abortion laws at all here in Canada for 30 years and the sky hasn't fallen. It it considered a medical procedure decided on between a woman and her doctor and nobody else's business.

This is why we can’t take you unequivocally pro abortion people seriously. It’s the man’s business too — if as the man want to keep the baby I should be able to. In addition, if I as a man don’t want to pay for the baby but the woman wants to keep it, I should have to. Men should have the same rights as women in the matter otherwise women have all the rights, men have none, and the baby that you murdered has none.

Okay, hun. As soon as the fetus can be transferred to your body to carry you go for it.

LOL we all know you would never in a million years agree to lend your body for 9 months to gestate a pregnancy.

Agreed.
No more ending the life of a fetus once it’s viable without its mother.

"No more"? When does that every happen? Please state all the places a woman can end a healthy pregnancy after viability (25+ weeks).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When the baby is already viable, you don’t need to “remain” pregnant. You are no longer needed. So why kill the baby?

You clearly haven’t read this whole thread. Get a clue and learn about the tragic, dangerous and heartbreaking situations that produce the tiny number of abortions of viable fetuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Until every foster kid has a home, the “but what about adoption” crowd should shut up. They only want white newborns. That’s not pro-life.

That’s so untrue. I know many people who adopted children that were not their own color. I know many, many people who adopted older children. Tons of people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You were ALREADY an “incubator” up until the day you go get your abortion, no?
If it’s viable, why not allow her to continue her life? Why terminate the life of a viable little girl (or boy)?

Written by a troll or someone who has never carried a pregnancy to term or given birth in the third trimester. There’s a huge difference between being 12 weeks pregnant and being 30+ weeks pregnant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When the baby is already viable, you don’t need to “remain” pregnant. You are no longer needed. So why kill the baby?

Nobody has an abortion past the point of viability, for the most part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the baby is already viable, you don’t need to “remain” pregnant. You are no longer needed. So why kill the baby?

Nobody has an abortion past the point of viability, for the most part.

Excellent birth control available for women and men. Or is that too much trouble?