But that’s *literally* what this thread is about. Move the goalposts all you want, you’re still wrong. |
What a strange response. You don’t think that as a kid I’d know if my dad knows what toys I play with? Kids aren’t dumb. Of course I wouldn’t have known all the conversations and delegations, but I would certainly notice if all the work is primarily done by one parent and the second has no clue what is going on. And I would definitely notice if the parent doing all the work resented the situation. That sort of thing is extremely obvious to kids because parents usually do a poor job of hiding it. |
DP. The standards on fathers today are higher than our own fathers (as it should be). I doubt mothers who were raising kids in the He-man/Little Pony would be as resentful for the mental load. What would your mother say? I had to say - you go to Kmart and buy actions figures, I’ll finish dinner and wrap when you get home. He didn’t just volunteer? Or know which task to take? Would she resent that? Seems unlikely for that generation. But that’s what we’re talking about today. Also - children are very naive about the behind the scenes discussions between parents. |
Even in a modern marriage with men actively participating, it’s almost always up to the DW to assign tasks and make all household decisions. Yet my DH can manage a complex job with many direct reports. I don’t believe he can’t manage buying teacher gifts or signing up for aftercare. Instead, he doesn’t care and knows I’ll do it. What this means is that I have an extra burden he doesn’t have - all the admin work. We both have FT jobs and present for the kids and then I have an admin job on top of it all. Men are great at prioritizing themselves and their careers. |
My mother was an 80s housewife without a job. She DGAF if she had to buy Christmas presents and plan the vacation. That was her job. Now I have a FT job AND still have to manage the vacation and buy presents. |
And you knew this when you married him. How was his father? Did you think he was magically going to be different from the way you and he were brought up? You chose to marry him and accept this. |
You don't need a full time job. You want it. You don't need Christmas presents and vacation. You want them. You saw what it took for your parents to make marriage work but you decided you were smarter and better and could work miracles. Who did you model your marriage after? Some TV show couple? You are not superwoman, and your DH is not superman. Welcome to reality! |
Uh, her parents had Christmas presents and vacation, too. |
| i've accepted that I carry all the mental labor while I am also the primary breadwinner. But I assign him all the stuff I dont want to do. At least that is one benefit! |
I'm with you on the agency argument, for the most part, but honestly? If you want to have kids and own a home in DC, either your spouse has to be crazy wealthy, or you both have to work. The diminished mental load from working part-time vs. full is negligible, as you still have to coordinate schedules, budget for work-related expenses, etc. The alternative is not working outside the home at all and staying home as an "80s housewife" or the like. It's not "without a job" but it's without paid employment and the financial options and self-esteem that go with having a salary of your own. In short, there still isn't a great option for women. We need financial incentives and benefits for staying at home to raise our children ourselves. Never gonna happen. |
And her mom stayed home. |
No one said that, dummy. I’m saying as a kid you wouldn’t know if your mom had to say to your dad, every single year, hey go to the store and get the kids some Christmas presents. OP isn’t talking about doing all the work. She’s talking about the “mental load” of delegating half the work to her husband. And no, kids wouldn’t notice that. Your response isn’t strange, it’s painfully stupid. Or just disingenuous. |
What’s your source for this claim? If it’s just unhappy shrews whining on the internet about how hard thinking is, be advised that you have a biased sample. |
Glad you acknowledged that these are all wants. You do not have to stay in DC. You do not need to have children. We can negotiate better financial incentives and benefits with our spouses in prenups, but we chose not to because we are desperate to get married and repeat cycles that we know were disadvantageous to our mothers. For example, women can negotiate prenups stipulating that men give them 100k in a separate non- premarital account before each child is born so they have some independence while staying home at the early stages of child development. Options like this are rarely considered because women have chosen to be delusional about the reality of raising children in a capitalist society. It is easier to pretend that love will conquer all instead of negotiating marriage like the contract that it is. Additionally, the price of housing in DC and other big cities is high because there is a demand at that price. If many families had only one working spouse, few will be able to pay those prices, and the prices will go down. |
This may oversimplify things a bit, but I don't disagree. And women can also negotiate post-nups if they're in a situation already and want it to change. There's a lot of victim mentality "it can't be helped" attitude on this thread, which is nonsense. Change it or leave. There are still options. Staying uhappy and complaining is a choice. |