
Oh, that is interesting. I had not thought about how some states have to have plates on front and back of vehicles and some don't, and how that would be a clue. |
What I'm really waiting to find out is how & why those girls were targeted. |
+1 Because he was a sicko - but I am waiting to hear what his lame "excuse" is, PP. So gross. |
It looks like it, but he still gets a fair trial. |
This isn't going to be a death penalty case. He is going to plead. |
x1000000 THIS. |
-1 Are you some sort of stalker? Your post isn't even funny. |
My gut feeling is that it was jealousy-- he noticed these happy, fun, good looking people and was angry because he didn't have that social ease and couldn't get girls like that. Maybe he stalked for a while just out of curiosity, and then only got more incensed. Some males think they are owed pretty young blondes as birthright,- they are failed white guys called "incels." This one has mental issues, potentially psychopathic, and he is smart enough to know this about himself. |
Please- they know he is batshit. Did you watch the police stops. Dad said he was “punchy”. |
I am curious if the other surviving roommate heard anything that may not have been revealed yet? Perhaps she heard noises too but authorities left it out since the named roommate in affidavit saw the perpetrator and that info was needed to prove probable cause? It's just hard to believe that with now knowing that some could have been awake when attacked that there was no screaming, shouting, etc. |
x10000 Nailed it. He is not the only one! |
In the college forum, several posters slammed the police; swore the roommates did it; called it a murder suicide.
I just remember the state has to prove guilt. The accused does not have to prove himself a innocence. |
All of that speculation was made in an information vacuum prior to release of the affidavit. The evidence cited in the affidavit that led to the suspect’s arrest is very strong. For one, there is no reasonable explanation for a knife sheath with his DNA on it to be next to one of the victims other than him accidentally leaving it there at the time the crimes were committed. And keep in mind, the affidavit very likely does not contain ALL the evidence that exists in this case. There will be more to come if this goes to trial. I suspect there is additional DNA evidence in this case. The perpetrator was in direct contact with the four victims, and it’s hard to not leave DNA behind in that scenario due to transfer. There may also have been things like shed hairs found by the victims. And if any of the victims struggled with him, his skin may have been under their fingernails or similar. And of course, the victim’s DNA almost certainly ended up on his clothes, and was transferred into his vehicle via his clothing and the knife. How much of that he was able to clean up before law enforcement was in possession of his car remains to be seen. We’ll see, but I will be interested to learn about any other biological evidence that exists in this case. |
It's not supposed to be funny. It is possible he could regularly drive that route, e.g. he's an Uber Eats/Doordash driver. (And one of the victims did make a Doordash order that night). You just don't know yet, and are jumping to conclusions to convict him before he gets a chance to defend himself. |
|