Jimmy Kimmel show cancelled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

Okay so dems think that Trump called the Chairman of the FCC, who then called the network execs and said, "Jimmy Kimmel makes mean jokes about Trump. Fire him." Is that a correct reading of the Democratic position on Jimmy Kimmels show being canceled?

No, this was all done publicly, out in the open. Why are you commenting when you seem so unfamiliar with what happened?

Because I can't find any public letters from FCC to ABC. It's a sunshine act agency. The news says they threatened regulatory action, so there should be documentation of that. There's very little in the news stories apart from a single salty quote from the FCC Chair.

You think threats can only be made in letters? If you saw the FCC chairs public threat, then you know perfectly well what the issue is.

I'm trying to understand the Democratic position. The network denies that they canceled the show due to pressure from the administration. But people are saying that the FCC chairman, or Trump, or someone, pressured them.

It looks like the FCC noted in a podcast that JK spread misinformation about the Charlie Kirk assassination and that the FCC would be looking broadly at misinformation in news programming.

The network claims this isnt related to their decision to can him. I'm trying to understand the democrats theory of what exactly happened, I mean specifically. Because there is no agency documentation to back up that there was communication. And to answer your question specifically, I'm not sure I consider the FCC chairman saying he would enforce regulations a "threat." That’s what the FCC is charged with doing. Kimmel is lying about a significant news topic, if he wants to be credible enough to work in a newsy job, maybe he can try not lying.

“ Speaking on Thursday to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all seven swing states,” referring to his 2024 election win.

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said, according to audio from a press gaggle provided by the White House.

“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said.

The president said that the decision “will be up to Brendan Carr.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/trump-jimmy-kimmel-tv-network-licenses.html

Your boys are saying the quiet parts out loud again and this is where you start saying that this is a good thing and anyone that says anything negative about magas needs to be shut down because blah blah blah.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1292995.page

Okay. So Trump not only got Jimmy Kimmel fired for saying mean things about him, he also intends to "shut down" anyone who says any mean thing about "magas". Is that right?

What do you make of the fact that JK appeared to violate FCC regs when he spread misinformation about the Kirk assassination. JK claimed the assassin was a Trump voter and said that Trump was covering this up to score political points. Is that just okay? Should we only censor conservatives?

Are you saying the MAGA position is that Kimmel violated FCC regs? I can’t find the FCC vote saying that.

No, I said appeared to. Not that the FCC issued a violation. In fact the lack of FCC action on this would suggest that the democrat belief that FCC action led to his firing is wrong. If they took action, or developed a position, that would be public record.

The alternative is that the FCC had nothing to do with this at all. But the democrats need the FCC to be involved in order to further the censorship narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

Okay so dems think that Trump called the Chairman of the FCC, who then called the network execs and said, "Jimmy Kimmel makes mean jokes about Trump. Fire him." Is that a correct reading of the Democratic position on Jimmy Kimmels show being canceled?

No, this was all done publicly, out in the open. Why are you commenting when you seem so unfamiliar with what happened?

Because I can't find any public letters from FCC to ABC. It's a sunshine act agency. The news says they threatened regulatory action, so there should be documentation of that. There's very little in the news stories apart from a single salty quote from the FCC Chair.

You think threats can only be made in letters? If you saw the FCC chairs public threat, then you know perfectly well what the issue is.

I'm trying to understand the Democratic position. The network denies that they canceled the show due to pressure from the administration. But people are saying that the FCC chairman, or Trump, or someone, pressured them.

It looks like the FCC noted in a podcast that JK spread misinformation about the Charlie Kirk assassination and that the FCC would be looking broadly at misinformation in news programming.

The network claims this isnt related to their decision to can him. I'm trying to understand the democrats theory of what exactly happened, I mean specifically. Because there is no agency documentation to back up that there was communication. And to answer your question specifically, I'm not sure I consider the FCC chairman saying he would enforce regulations a "threat." That’s what the FCC is charged with doing. Kimmel is lying about a significant news topic, if he wants to be credible enough to work in a newsy job, maybe he can try not lying.

“ Speaking on Thursday to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all seven swing states,” referring to his 2024 election win.

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said, according to audio from a press gaggle provided by the White House.

“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said.

The president said that the decision “will be up to Brendan Carr.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/trump-jimmy-kimmel-tv-network-licenses.html

Your boys are saying the quiet parts out loud again and this is where you start saying that this is a good thing and anyone that says anything negative about magas needs to be shut down because blah blah blah.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1292995.page

Okay. So Trump not only got Jimmy Kimmel fired for saying mean things about him, he also intends to "shut down" anyone who says any mean thing about "magas". Is that right?

What do you make of the fact that JK appeared to violate FCC regs when he spread misinformation about the Kirk assassination. JK claimed the assassin was a Trump voter and said that Trump was covering this up to score political points. Is that just okay? Should we only censor conservatives?

Are you saying the MAGA position is that Kimmel violated FCC regs? I can’t find the FCC vote saying that.

No, I said appeared to. Not that the FCC issued a violation. In fact the lack of FCC action on this would suggest that the democrat belief that FCC action led to his firing is wrong. If they took action, or developed a position, that would be public record.

The alternative is that the FCC had nothing to do with this at all. But the democrats need the FCC to be involved in order to further the censorship narrative.

Congratulations, the Democrats will absolutely end up using the FCC in a more aggressive way. Keep giving them justifications to get rid of your propaganda MAGA propaganda outlets and they will use them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

The FCC chairman can't unilaterally yank a license. What I saw was a political appointee going off about an issue.

To yank a license, there would need to be a commission vote. Yet the matter isnt even before the commission- if it were, it would be public record. And even then, there would be administrative processes and finally, most likely, a challenge in court.

So I think your reaction is hysterical. All that happened was that a guy popped off on a podcast.

[Anonymous]

You know this is going really badly for MAGA when they start denying Trump had anything to do with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

Okay so dems think that Trump called the Chairman of the FCC, who then called the network execs and said, "Jimmy Kimmel makes mean jokes about Trump. Fire him." Is that a correct reading of the Democratic position on Jimmy Kimmels show being canceled?

No, this was all done publicly, out in the open. Why are you commenting when you seem so unfamiliar with what happened?

Because I can't find any public letters from FCC to ABC. It's a sunshine act agency. The news says they threatened regulatory action, so there should be documentation of that. There's very little in the news stories apart from a single salty quote from the FCC Chair.

You think threats can only be made in letters? If you saw the FCC chairs public threat, then you know perfectly well what the issue is.

I'm trying to understand the Democratic position. The network denies that they canceled the show due to pressure from the administration. But people are saying that the FCC chairman, or Trump, or someone, pressured them.

It looks like the FCC noted in a podcast that JK spread misinformation about the Charlie Kirk assassination and that the FCC would be looking broadly at misinformation in news programming.

The network claims this isnt related to their decision to can him. I'm trying to understand the democrats theory of what exactly happened, I mean specifically. Because there is no agency documentation to back up that there was communication. And to answer your question specifically, I'm not sure I consider the FCC chairman saying he would enforce regulations a "threat." That’s what the FCC is charged with doing. Kimmel is lying about a significant news topic, if he wants to be credible enough to work in a newsy job, maybe he can try not lying.

“ Speaking on Thursday to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all seven swing states,” referring to his 2024 election win.

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said, according to audio from a press gaggle provided by the White House.

“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said.

The president said that the decision “will be up to Brendan Carr.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/trump-jimmy-kimmel-tv-network-licenses.html

Your boys are saying the quiet parts out loud again and this is where you start saying that this is a good thing and anyone that says anything negative about magas needs to be shut down because blah blah blah.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1292995.page

Okay. So Trump not only got Jimmy Kimmel fired for saying mean things about him, he also intends to "shut down" anyone who says any mean thing about "magas". Is that right?

What do you make of the fact that JK appeared to violate FCC regs when he spread misinformation about the Kirk assassination. JK claimed the assassin was a Trump voter and said that Trump was covering this up to score political points. Is that just okay? Should we only censor conservatives?

Are you saying the MAGA position is that Kimmel violated FCC regs? I can’t find the FCC vote saying that.

No, I said appeared to. Not that the FCC issued a violation. In fact the lack of FCC action on this would suggest that the democrat belief that FCC action led to his firing is wrong. If they took action, or developed a position, that would be public record.

The alternative is that the FCC had nothing to do with this at all. But the democrats need the FCC to be involved in order to further the censorship narrative.

Congratulations, the Democrats will absolutely end up using the FCC in a more aggressive way. Keep giving them justifications to get rid of your propaganda MAGA propaganda outlets and they will use them.

Relax. The FCC has only revoked broadcast licenses for failure to pay fees.

This is all just sound and fury, signifying nothing. Total click bait nothingness. JK got fired bc he sucks and per usual it's Trump's fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know this is going really badly for MAGA when they start denying Trump had anything to do with it.

No, maga is pretty consistent that Trump isnt actually an omnipresent force, firing failed comedians and causing earthquakes. That superhuman caricature is a left creation.

[Anonymous]

"I do think that again, we are in the midst of a massive shift in dynamics in the media ecosystem for lots of reasons, again, including the permission structure that President Trump’s election has provided. And I would simply say we’re not done yet with seeing the consequences of that." Quote from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr.

Also said by Carr, after Kimmel's show was aired: "This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead."

To break it down in simple terms: The FCC threatened Disney and ABC over Jimmy Kimmel. Kimmel's show was thereafter pulled. The FCC controls mergers and thus can prevent companies from making deals they want to make.

That is government pressure on indepenedent media corporations to remove programming they don't like. When the government represses free speech, that is a violation of the First Amendment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

Okay so dems think that Trump called the Chairman of the FCC, who then called the network execs and said, "Jimmy Kimmel makes mean jokes about Trump. Fire him." Is that a correct reading of the Democratic position on Jimmy Kimmels show being canceled?

No, this was all done publicly, out in the open. Why are you commenting when you seem so unfamiliar with what happened?

Because I can't find any public letters from FCC to ABC. It's a sunshine act agency. The news says they threatened regulatory action, so there should be documentation of that. There's very little in the news stories apart from a single salty quote from the FCC Chair.

You think threats can only be made in letters? If you saw the FCC chairs public threat, then you know perfectly well what the issue is.

I'm trying to understand the Democratic position. The network denies that they canceled the show due to pressure from the administration. But people are saying that the FCC chairman, or Trump, or someone, pressured them.

It looks like the FCC noted in a podcast that JK spread misinformation about the Charlie Kirk assassination and that the FCC would be looking broadly at misinformation in news programming.

The network claims this isnt related to their decision to can him. I'm trying to understand the democrats theory of what exactly happened, I mean specifically. Because there is no agency documentation to back up that there was communication. And to answer your question specifically, I'm not sure I consider the FCC chairman saying he would enforce regulations a "threat." That’s what the FCC is charged with doing. Kimmel is lying about a significant news topic, if he wants to be credible enough to work in a newsy job, maybe he can try not lying.

“ Speaking on Thursday to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all seven swing states,” referring to his 2024 election win.

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said, according to audio from a press gaggle provided by the White House.

“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said.

The president said that the decision “will be up to Brendan Carr.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/trump-jimmy-kimmel-tv-network-licenses.html

Your boys are saying the quiet parts out loud again and this is where you start saying that this is a good thing and anyone that says anything negative about magas needs to be shut down because blah blah blah.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1292995.page

Okay. So Trump not only got Jimmy Kimmel fired for saying mean things about him, he also intends to "shut down" anyone who says any mean thing about "magas". Is that right?

What do you make of the fact that JK appeared to violate FCC regs when he spread misinformation about the Kirk assassination. JK claimed the assassin was a Trump voter and said that Trump was covering this up to score political points. Is that just okay? Should we only censor conservatives?

Are you saying the MAGA position is that Kimmel violated FCC regs? I can’t find the FCC vote saying that.

No, I said appeared to. Not that the FCC issued a violation. In fact the lack of FCC action on this would suggest that the democrat belief that FCC action led to his firing is wrong. If they took action, or developed a position, that would be public record.

The alternative is that the FCC had nothing to do with this at all. But the democrats need the FCC to be involved in order to further the censorship narrative.

Congratulations, the Democrats will absolutely end up using the FCC in a more aggressive way. Keep giving them justifications to get rid of your propaganda MAGA propaganda outlets and they will use them.

Yes. It’s only a matter of time before a conservative news anchor or late night comedian gets removed. Oh, wait…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

The FCC chairman can't unilaterally yank a license. What I saw was a political appointee going off about an issue.

To yank a license, there would need to be a commission vote. Yet the matter isnt even before the commission- if it were, it would be public record. And even then, there would be administrative processes and finally, most likely, a challenge in court.

So I think your reaction is hysterical. All that happened was that a guy popped off on a podcast.

So do you also rant about Biden “censoring” Facebook on other threads?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

The FCC chairman can't unilaterally yank a license. What I saw was a political appointee going off about an issue.

To yank a license, there would need to be a commission vote. Yet the matter isnt even before the commission- if it were, it would be public record. And even then, there would be administrative processes and finally, most likely, a challenge in court.

So I think your reaction is hysterical. All that happened was that a guy popped off on a podcast.

So do you also rant about Biden “censoring” Facebook on other threads?

Yes. The DHS inappropriately censored conservatives on Twitter, FB. Etc. This was upheld by SCOTUS as not being unconstitutional. Surely any of the discussed FCC action would also be upheld, if enacted.

[Anonymous]

This was reported by 1440 and beyond revolting. I insist the felon apologize to me and give me back my federal tax dollars he’s abusing. Sickening. Nobody should be forced to make a political contribution to keep their job. So much grift.

“Sinclair said the comments crossed its expected professional standards and called for Kimmel to directly apologize to Kirk’s family and contribute financially to both the family and Turning Point USA, the group Kirk founded. Sinclair also requested formal talks with ABC executives about ensuring accountability in network programming.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know this is going really badly for MAGA when they start denying Trump had anything to do with it.

Yup, they are backtracking furiously. The wall to wall headlines about Trump censoring free speech are not playing well. But the funniest part is Trump himself doesn’t seem to get it yet. He’s still out there taking credit for getting Kimmel fired and now he’s trying to get Fallon fired too. He’s got such a thin skin he just can’t stand any criticism at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to make sure I have this right. Democrats think Trump or his people called the network and said something like, "Jimmy Kimmel makes jokes about me. Please fire him." And the network execs said okay and canceled his show. Do I have that right?

We all saw the video of the FCC chairman threatening ABC’s broadcast license. Do you not grasp that in the American system of government the various executive agencies and their appointed heads fall under the direct command of the executive? No, of course you do. You’re just playing games rather than acknowledging- as many conservatives have in response to this - that the current occupant of the WH is an existential threat to the most bedrock of our civil rights, the one which enshrines all the rest.

Okay so dems think that Trump called the Chairman of the FCC, who then called the network execs and said, "Jimmy Kimmel makes mean jokes about Trump. Fire him." Is that a correct reading of the Democratic position on Jimmy Kimmels show being canceled?

No, this was all done publicly, out in the open. Why are you commenting when you seem so unfamiliar with what happened?

Because I can't find any public letters from FCC to ABC. It's a sunshine act agency. The news says they threatened regulatory action, so there should be documentation of that. There's very little in the news stories apart from a single salty quote from the FCC Chair.

You think threats can only be made in letters? If you saw the FCC chairs public threat, then you know perfectly well what the issue is.

I'm trying to understand the Democratic position. The network denies that they canceled the show due to pressure from the administration. But people are saying that the FCC chairman, or Trump, or someone, pressured them.

It looks like the FCC noted in a podcast that JK spread misinformation about the Charlie Kirk assassination and that the FCC would be looking broadly at misinformation in news programming.

The network claims this isnt related to their decision to can him. I'm trying to understand the democrats theory of what exactly happened, I mean specifically. Because there is no agency documentation to back up that there was communication. And to answer your question specifically, I'm not sure I consider the FCC chairman saying he would enforce regulations a "threat." That’s what the FCC is charged with doing. Kimmel is lying about a significant news topic, if he wants to be credible enough to work in a newsy job, maybe he can try not lying.

“ Speaking on Thursday to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all seven swing states,” referring to his 2024 election win.

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said, according to audio from a press gaggle provided by the White House.

“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said.

The president said that the decision “will be up to Brendan Carr.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/trump-jimmy-kimmel-tv-network-licenses.html

Your boys are saying the quiet parts out loud again and this is where you start saying that this is a good thing and anyone that says anything negative about magas needs to be shut down because blah blah blah.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1292995.page

Okay. So Trump not only got Jimmy Kimmel fired for saying mean things about him, he also intends to "shut down" anyone who says any mean thing about "magas". Is that right?

What do you make of the fact that JK appeared to violate FCC regs when he spread misinformation about the Kirk assassination. JK claimed the assassin was a Trump voter and said that Trump was covering this up to score political points. Is that just okay? Should we only censor conservatives?

Are you saying the MAGA position is that Kimmel violated FCC regs? I can’t find the FCC vote saying that.

No, I said appeared to. Not that the FCC issued a violation. In fact the lack of FCC action on this would suggest that the democrat belief that FCC action led to his firing is wrong. If they took action, or developed a position, that would be public record.

The alternative is that the FCC had nothing to do with this at all. But the democrats need the FCC to be involved in order to further the censorship narrative.

Is this a joke? It’s been widely reported this admin isn’t following proper documentation procedures. He’s fired staffers who handled FOIA requests. Signal chat, anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know this is going really badly for MAGA when they start denying Trump had anything to do with it.

Yup, they are backtracking furiously. The wall to wall headlines about Trump censoring free speech are not playing well. But the funniest part is Trump himself doesn’t seem to get it yet. He’s still out there taking credit for getting Kimmel fired and now he’s trying to get Fallon fired too. He’s got such a thin skin he just can’t stand any criticism at all.

Perfect for Kimmel’s defense when he sues.