Pete Hedgseth for Secretary of Defense

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Remember this Republican party? I actually miss it.



Those were the days.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Her story doesn't sound fabricated. Nice try though
https://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/11-20-24-Mediaite.pdf

Regardless of whether their sex was consensual, he still shouldn't be Secretary of Defense. He went to a conference of Republican women to speak, got blackout drunk (he claims to not remember things too), groped and propositioned multiple women, and ended up having sex with one of them who says it was rape.

You want someone like that - who's so easily compromised - to know our national secrets and be in charge of our armed forces?


Multiple people spoken to that had contact with her all throughout the night, including just before the incident and whomever she shared a room with that spoke to her immediately upon her arrival to the room after the event, said she did not appear drunk, drugged, stuporous, hung over or anything other than normal and coherent. All surveillance videos also indicate she was walking straight and not stumbling.



So he paid her off for nothing? Shouldn't'a bothered with the NDA, I guess. Oopsie. Dumb of him.


No doubt because anyone can file a lawsuit. He's a well known high profile guy. Much easier for his insurance company to pay off these kinds. Happens all the time. Also, once you sign an NDA it clearly says you hold that other person blameless. Basically, she accepted money instead of continuing on in court which again shows what she wanted all along.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Her story doesn't sound fabricated. Nice try though
https://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/11-20-24-Mediaite.pdf

Regardless of whether their sex was consensual, he still shouldn't be Secretary of Defense. He went to a conference of Republican women to speak, got blackout drunk (he claims to not remember things too), groped and propositioned multiple women, and ended up having sex with one of them who says it was rape.

You want someone like that - who's so easily compromised - to know our national secrets and be in charge of our armed forces?


Multiple people spoken to that had contact with her all throughout the night, including just before the incident and whomever she shared a room with that spoke to her immediately upon her arrival to the room after the event, said she did not appear drunk, drugged, stuporous, hung over or anything other than normal and coherent. All surveillance videos also indicate she was walking straight and not stumbling.



So he paid her off for nothing? Shouldn't'a bothered with the NDA, I guess. Oopsie. Dumb of him.


No doubt because anyone can file a lawsuit. He's a well known high profile guy. Much easier for his insurance company to pay off these kinds. Happens all the time. Also, once you sign an NDA it clearly says you hold that other person blameless. Basically, she accepted money instead of continuing on in court which again shows what she wanted all along.



If he hadn’t bragged about and shared videos of him doing drugs at sex parties with minors, maybe people would believe him.


I think that was the other guy. But they're easy to mixup, so maybe I'm the one who is confused.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.


Yes with a nice amount of money. Not uncommon.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.


Yes with a nice amount of money. Not uncommon.


SMH
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.


Yes. No charges were brought. She wants to remain anonymous. He isn’t guilty of anything, according to the law, therefore there would be no judgement in her favor anyhow. Why wouldn’t she accept the money? She isn’t getting anything else of this accept whatever sum she was paid for the NDA
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.


Yes with a nice amount of money. Not uncommon.


Yeah no.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Her story doesn't sound fabricated. Nice try though
https://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/11-20-24-Mediaite.pdf

Regardless of whether their sex was consensual, he still shouldn't be Secretary of Defense. He went to a conference of Republican women to speak, got blackout drunk (he claims to not remember things too), groped and propositioned multiple women, and ended up having sex with one of them who says it was rape.

You want someone like that - who's so easily compromised - to know our national secrets and be in charge of our armed forces?


And when hotel staff were called about a disturbance out by the pool, he appeared “very intoxicated” and was yelling about the fact that he was exercising his first amendment rights.

How can he be on top of an organization that relies entirely upon discipline? What type of role model is this for a young enlisted guy?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.


Yes with a nice amount of money. Not uncommon.


Yeah no.


And the prior poster has no way of knowing who is telling the truth in these cases (see Stormy Daniels).
Anonymous
Here's the MAGA way:

Innocent until proven guilty.

Innocent after proven guilty.

But only if you are MAGA. If you are a dem, it's guilty, guilty, guilty.
Anonymous
She also texted her friend earlier that night that he was “giving off creepy vibes.”

She did not exactly sound charmed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Her story doesn't sound fabricated. Nice try though
https://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/11-20-24-Mediaite.pdf

Regardless of whether their sex was consensual, he still shouldn't be Secretary of Defense. He went to a conference of Republican women to speak, got blackout drunk (he claims to not remember things too), groped and propositioned multiple women, and ended up having sex with one of them who says it was rape.

You want someone like that - who's so easily compromised - to know our national secrets and be in charge of our armed forces?


Multiple people spoken to that had contact with her all throughout the night, including just before the incident and whomever she shared a room with that spoke to her immediately upon her arrival to the room after the event, said she did not appear drunk, drugged, stuporous, hung over or anything other than normal and coherent. All surveillance videos also indicate she was walking straight and not stumbling.



So he paid her off for nothing? Shouldn't'a bothered with the NDA, I guess. Oopsie. Dumb of him.


No doubt because anyone can file a lawsuit. He's a well known high profile guy. Much easier for his insurance company to pay off these kinds. Happens all the time. Also, once you sign an NDA it clearly says you hold that other person blameless. Basically, she accepted money instead of continuing on in court which again shows what she wanted all along.



If he hadn’t bragged about and shared videos of him doing drugs at sex parties with minors, maybe people would believe him.


I think that was the other guy. But they're easy to mixup, so maybe I'm the one who is confused.


You’re right. So many of them and a thread for each- I got my threads mixed up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Mediaite has the police report.
“The report, provided by the City of Monterey, California, was previously released to Hegseth in March 2021, per his request. It runs 24 pages and details the allegation leveled by a woman who claimed in 2017 that she was sexually assaulted by the cable news star at a Republican women’s conference.”
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-full-police-report-details-pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-allegation/


It was investigated and no charges were filed. Her story sounds fabricated and likely motive was she regretted and was remorseful for cheating on her husband, so she decided it wasn’t consensual. Why would a married woman be walking “arm and arm smiling” with another man and going into his hotel room alone, if not to have consensual sex?


Yes, I noticed there were no criminal charges. It's all coming out again solely for political reasons. I believe she was trying to deflect away from her cheating to save her marriage. Oh and yes she is on video arm and arm smiling, lol. Says it all.


Seriously? You think she accused him of rape to save her marriage, but then in order to avoid the publicity and humiliation of accusing him of rape (because the victim is raked through the coals when they make an accusation), she accepted an NDA? That makes sense to you?

Interesting.


Yes. No charges were brought. She wants to remain anonymous. He isn’t guilty of anything, according to the law, therefore there would be no judgement in her favor anyhow. Why wouldn’t she accept the money? She isn’t getting anything else of this accept whatever sum she was paid for the NDA


Exactly! This is all coming back around because Dems are going to try and make it hard because Trump won. He can only do 4 years so people need to relax.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: