Evan Rachel Wood names her abuser.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone assumed that it was Marilyln Manson considering she was with him when she was very young (and was probably abused by men before him). I cannot believe the victim blaming on this thread. You lot are disgusting.


IT’S NOT VICTIM BLAMING!!!!! I have enormous sympathy for her. But DAMN, let’s use good judgment and instincts ladies!


When you are young your instincts and judgements are less matured and your perception of dangerous behavior not as evolved as an adult. This isn’t just lack of experience, it’s biological and a reflection of brain and emotional development. Moreover, people like Manson, who groomed Wood from a young age, intentionally desensitize their victims to inappropriate and/or dangerous acts; it’s the entire point of grooming and how they prey on and ultimately exploit their victims. Lastly, in Hollywood, where children are adultified and sexualized, predatory behavior is - or has been historically - normalized.

All of which is to day, you ARE victim blaming. And you are substantiating it by using terms like “good judgement” that negate that young victims of rape, abuse, and assault are often deprived through grooming, lack of appropriate boundaries of adults around them, lack of supervision of truly caring, responsible adults, and sheer youth to detect what is assault versus affection, rape versus consensual sex, and “normal” versus inappropriate behavior.

Please stop.


No. I’ve been to pedophile & abuse training for youth. One of the biggest points they drive home is how to sharpen our senses, how to listen to our instincts. Your message seems to be implying to we have no instincts, agency, or ability to develop character discernment. We absolutely do. Young women must listen to them. In these training courses, they talk about grooming. They discuss what type of “asks” are inappropriate, and what type of “asks” should send a shiver down your spine. Many of us know these things intuitively. Many others need to hear it (especially kids). I do not blame Rachel whatsoever. But...let’s encourage our kids to take people for their word. If they appear to be cruel, then don’t enter a relationship or leave it when it becomes apparent. That’s all. And nothing I said is controversial.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone assumed that it was Marilyln Manson considering she was with him when she was very young (and was probably abused by men before him). I cannot believe the victim blaming on this thread. You lot are disgusting.


IT’S NOT VICTIM BLAMING!!!!! I have enormous sympathy for her. But DAMN, let’s use good judgment and instincts ladies!


When you are young your instincts and judgements are less matured and your perception of dangerous behavior not as evolved as an adult. This isn’t just lack of experience, it’s biological and a reflection of brain and emotional development. Moreover, people like Manson, who groomed Wood from a young age, intentionally desensitize their victims to inappropriate and/or dangerous acts; it’s the entire point of grooming and how they prey on and ultimately exploit their victims. Lastly, in Hollywood, where children are adultified and sexualized, predatory behavior is - or has been historically - normalized.

All of which is to day, you ARE victim blaming. And you are substantiating it by using terms like “good judgement” that negate that young victims of rape, abuse, and assault are often deprived through grooming, lack of appropriate boundaries of adults around them, lack of supervision of truly caring, responsible adults, and sheer youth to detect what is assault versus affection, rape versus consensual sex, and “normal” versus inappropriate behavior.

Please stop.


No. I’ve been to pedophile & abuse training for youth. One of the biggest points they drive home is how to sharpen our senses, how to listen to our instincts. Your message seems to be implying to we have no instincts, agency, or ability to develop character discernment. We absolutely do. Young women must listen to them. In these training courses, they talk about grooming. They discuss what type of “asks” are inappropriate, and what type of “asks” should send a shiver down your spine. Many of us know these things intuitively. Many others need to hear it (especially kids). I do not blame Rachel whatsoever. But...let’s encourage our kids to take people for their word. If they appear to be cruel, then don’t enter a relationship or leave it when it becomes apparent. That’s all. And nothing I said is controversial.


Sure, in an ideal world kids are encouraged to recognized alarm bells and set boundaries and intuitively detect predators and alert responsible adults. But predators often seek out kids who don’t live in that ideal world, they look for kids who seem less protected, more eager to please, and/or neglected emotionally and otherwise. Moreover, predators don’t always appear cruel - that’s very often the essence of grooming (which you’d know if you’ve taken abuse training). So yes, let’s encourage kids to use their instincts and their voice, but just because kids are abused doesn’t mean they failed in some way. Or that they just weren’t paying attention, or “should have known”. That’s what you’re implying and no, that’s not right - it’s absolutely victim blaming. Woods was clearly caught and groomed by a predator. It’s not because she failed in some way.
Anonymous
No one said she failed. WE fail kids all. the. time. because “not my business”!!! Hell, it IS our business.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where the hell were her parents when all of this was going down? Or the rest of her friends and family? How terrifying.


Seriously. Massive parenting fail when your teen daughter is dating a 30 something man.


She was 18 or 19.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where the hell were her parents when all of this was going down? Or the rest of her friends and family? How terrifying.


Seriously. Massive parenting fail when your teen daughter is dating a 30 something man.


She was 18 or 19.

No doubt she had been abused way before.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where the hell were her parents when all of this was going down? Or the rest of her friends and family? How terrifying.


Seriously. Massive parenting fail when your teen daughter is dating a 30 something man.


She was 18 or 19.

No doubt she had been abused way before.


You don’t know this and have no business suggesting that. Moreover, not all 18 year olds, especially ones who grow up in an environment like Hollywood where boundary setting, especially for girls and women, isn’t typical, are savvy enough/ mature enough / confident enough to reject the advances of a 30 something man. Again, the insinuation is she should have known better. That’s victim blaming.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where the hell were her parents when all of this was going down? Or the rest of her friends and family? How terrifying.


Seriously. Massive parenting fail when your teen daughter is dating a 30 something man.


She was 18 or 19.

No doubt she had been abused way before.


You don’t know this and have no business suggesting that. Moreover, not all 18 year olds, especially ones who grow up in an environment like Hollywood where boundary setting, especially for girls and women, isn’t typical, are savvy enough/ mature enough / confident enough to reject the advances of a 30 something man. Again, the insinuation is she should have known better. That’s victim blaming.

You know you have a real comprehension problem? Reread what I said.
Anonymous
Hollywood is a cesspool of sexual abuse. Let’s be honest.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where the hell were her parents when all of this was going down? Or the rest of her friends and family? How terrifying.


Seriously. Massive parenting fail when your teen daughter is dating a 30 something man.


She was 18 or 19.

No doubt she had been abused way before.


You don’t know this and have no business suggesting that. Moreover, not all 18 year olds, especially ones who grow up in an environment like Hollywood where boundary setting, especially for girls and women, isn’t typical, are savvy enough/ mature enough / confident enough to reject the advances of a 30 something man. Again, the insinuation is she should have known better. That’s victim blaming.

You know you have a real comprehension problem? Reread what I said.


Reread what you wrote - which was a speculation that ERW had been abused prior to Manson. Reading comprehension and all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone assumed that it was Marilyln Manson considering she was with him when she was very young (and was probably abused by men before him). I cannot believe the victim blaming on this thread. You lot are disgusting.


IT’S NOT VICTIM BLAMING!!!!! I have enormous sympathy for her. But DAMN, let’s use good judgment and instincts ladies!


When you are young your instincts and judgements are less matured and your perception of dangerous behavior not as evolved as an adult. This isn’t just lack of experience, it’s biological and a reflection of brain and emotional development. Moreover, people like Manson, who groomed Wood from a young age, intentionally desensitize their victims to inappropriate and/or dangerous acts; it’s the entire point of grooming and how they prey on and ultimately exploit their victims. Lastly, in Hollywood, where children are adultified and sexualized, predatory behavior is - or has been historically - normalized.

All of which is to day, you ARE victim blaming. And you are substantiating it by using terms like “good judgement” that negate that young victims of rape, abuse, and assault are often deprived through grooming, lack of appropriate boundaries of adults around them, lack of supervision of truly caring, responsible adults, and sheer youth to detect what is assault versus affection, rape versus consensual sex, and “normal” versus inappropriate behavior.

Please stop.


No. I’ve been to pedophile & abuse training for youth. One of the biggest points they drive home is how to sharpen our senses, how to listen to our instincts. Your message seems to be implying to we have no instincts, agency, or ability to develop character discernment. We absolutely do. Young women must listen to them. In these training courses, they talk about grooming. They discuss what type of “asks” are inappropriate, and what type of “asks” should send a shiver down your spine. Many of us know these things intuitively. Many others need to hear it (especially kids). I do not blame Rachel whatsoever. But...let’s encourage our kids to take people for their word. If they appear to be cruel, then don’t enter a relationship or leave it when it becomes apparent. That’s all. And nothing I said is controversial.


You either didn't pay attention, twisted it to suit your preset narrative, or need to get your money back. Your lack of understanding how this works is utterly disgusting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where the hell were her parents when all of this was going down? Or the rest of her friends and family? How terrifying.


Seriously. Massive parenting fail when your teen daughter is dating a 30 something man.


+1 And then you read more about her life history and find out she was raped by two different men, not including Manson or whatever his name is. She clearly has been through trauma and is even now still making bad choices. Repeated abuse will do that to a person.

Her parents obviously failed her. I wonder about the rest of the family. Did no one watch what was happening and try to step in? It is horrible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone assumed that it was Marilyln Manson considering she was with him when she was very young (and was probably abused by men before him). I cannot believe the victim blaming on this thread. You lot are disgusting.


IT’S NOT VICTIM BLAMING!!!!! I have enormous sympathy for her. But DAMN, let’s use good judgment and instincts ladies!


When you are young your instincts and judgements are less matured and your perception of dangerous behavior not as evolved as an adult. This isn’t just lack of experience, it’s biological and a reflection of brain and emotional development. Moreover, people like Manson, who groomed Wood from a young age, intentionally desensitize their victims to inappropriate and/or dangerous acts; it’s the entire point of grooming and how they prey on and ultimately exploit their victims. Lastly, in Hollywood, where children are adultified and sexualized, predatory behavior is - or has been historically - normalized.

All of which is to day, you ARE victim blaming. And you are substantiating it by using terms like “good judgement” that negate that young victims of rape, abuse, and assault are often deprived through grooming, lack of appropriate boundaries of adults around them, lack of supervision of truly caring, responsible adults, and sheer youth to detect what is assault versus affection, rape versus consensual sex, and “normal” versus inappropriate behavior.

Please stop.


No. I’ve been to pedophile & abuse training for youth. One of the biggest points they drive home is how to sharpen our senses, how to listen to our instincts. Your message seems to be implying to we have no instincts, agency, or ability to develop character discernment. We absolutely do. Young women must listen to them. In these training courses, they talk about grooming. They discuss what type of “asks” are inappropriate, and what type of “asks” should send a shiver down your spine. Many of us know these things intuitively. Many others need to hear it (especially kids). I do not blame Rachel whatsoever. But...let’s encourage our kids to take people for their word. If they appear to be cruel, then don’t enter a relationship or leave it when it becomes apparent. That’s all. And nothing I said is controversial.


You either didn't pay attention, twisted it to suit your preset narrative, or need to get your money back. Your lack of understanding how this works is utterly disgusting.


NP. Yeah, the pp is victim blaming. If only sex abuse victims could recognize the signs, listen to themselves, etc then they wouldn't be abused-- that is the definition of victim blaming.

Pp, I'm glad you took that training. But people on this thread who are actual victims of abuse have told you that they grew up in situations that distorted their perception of normal so nothing seemed amiss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone assumed that it was Marilyln Manson considering she was with him when she was very young (and was probably abused by men before him). I cannot believe the victim blaming on this thread. You lot are disgusting.


IT’S NOT VICTIM BLAMING!!!!! I have enormous sympathy for her. But DAMN, let’s use good judgment and instincts ladies!


When you are young your instincts and judgements are less matured and your perception of dangerous behavior not as evolved as an adult. This isn’t just lack of experience, it’s biological and a reflection of brain and emotional development. Moreover, people like Manson, who groomed Wood from a young age, intentionally desensitize their victims to inappropriate and/or dangerous acts; it’s the entire point of grooming and how they prey on and ultimately exploit their victims. Lastly, in Hollywood, where children are adultified and sexualized, predatory behavior is - or has been historically - normalized.

All of which is to day, you ARE victim blaming. And you are substantiating it by using terms like “good judgement” that negate that young victims of rape, abuse, and assault are often deprived through grooming, lack of appropriate boundaries of adults around them, lack of supervision of truly caring, responsible adults, and sheer youth to detect what is assault versus affection, rape versus consensual sex, and “normal” versus inappropriate behavior.

Please stop.


No. I’ve been to pedophile & abuse training for youth. One of the biggest points they drive home is how to sharpen our senses, how to listen to our instincts. Your message seems to be implying to we have no instincts, agency, or ability to develop character discernment. We absolutely do. Young women must listen to them. In these training courses, they talk about grooming. They discuss what type of “asks” are inappropriate, and what type of “asks” should send a shiver down your spine. Many of us know these things intuitively. Many others need to hear it (especially kids). I do not blame Rachel whatsoever. But...let’s encourage our kids to take people for their word. If they appear to be cruel, then don’t enter a relationship or leave it when it becomes apparent. That’s all. And nothing I said is controversial.


You either didn't pay attention, twisted it to suit your preset narrative, or need to get your money back. Your lack of understanding how this works is utterly disgusting.


NP. Yeah, the pp is victim blaming. If only sex abuse victims could recognize the signs, listen to themselves, etc then they wouldn't be abused-- that is the definition of victim blaming.

Pp, I'm glad you took that training. But people on this thread who are actual victims of abuse have told you that they grew up in situations that distorted their perception of normal so nothing seemed amiss.


Not the person you're responding to but I don't think you're reading her post correctly. It is because of their abuse that some people who have been abused get stuck in a bad pattern. It is why you see people like Wood who go from bad circumstance to worse circumstance repeatedly. They have learned to accept and even expect the abuse, and they become incapable of reading the signals to keep themselves safe and to make better choices. Some people who have been abused need intensive retraining and therapy to learn how to do things that many of the rest of us do intuitively to keep ourselves safe. That isn't victim blaming, it is recognizing why people like Woods continue to make choices that the rest of us would not make because they seem so unsafe and unhealthy. It sounds like Woods is now finally working with a competent therapist. I hope she sticks with it and I hope that she is able to come to some peace and happiness.
Anonymous
I think everyone assumed that it was Marilyln Manson considering she was with him when she was very young (and was probably abused by men before him). I cannot believe the victim blaming on this thread. You lot are disgusting.


IT’S NOT VICTIM BLAMING!!!!! I have enormous sympathy for her. But DAMN, let’s use good judgment and instincts ladies!



There was a lot of press at the time fawning all over him for basically being the polar opposite of his persona in real life. A really calm, thoughtful, intelligent, and even shy guy who loved puppies and kittens and was the height of non-threatening. I think Dita originally put a lot of that narrative out there when they were together, but it was definitely a thing. He is actually pretty intelligent and well spoken but quiet in interviews. I can see that narrative making you question yourself, especially at 18.


Yes, I'm glad someone picked up on this... I was not goth, did not listen to Manson, and had no idea about his love life, but I do remember this being the media narrative at the time: it's all for show, it's art. And I think all the blamers are missing the point that it is very VERY unlikely that he approached Evan Rachel Wood by discussing how he liked to kill puppies/hurt partners. Instead it was likely a reiteration of this exact same narrative that was already the prevailing one--I am shy and sensitive and it is an absurd act you are smart enough to see this, save me, etc. The same crap many many much older women have fallen for when they want to rescue a (hopefully much less toxic) loser.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


There was a lot of press at the time fawning all over him for basically being the polar opposite of his persona in real life. A really calm, thoughtful, intelligent, and even shy guy who loved puppies and kittens and was the height of non-threatening. I think Dita originally put a lot of that narrative out there when they were together, but it was definitely a thing. He is actually pretty intelligent and well spoken but quiet in interviews. I can see that narrative making you question yourself, especially at 18.


Yes, I'm glad someone picked up on this... I was not goth, did not listen to Manson, and had no idea about his love life, but I do remember this being the media narrative at the time: it's all for show, it's art. And I think all the blamers are missing the point that it is very VERY unlikely that he approached Evan Rachel Wood by discussing how he liked to kill puppies/hurt partners. Instead it was likely a reiteration of this exact same narrative that was already the prevailing one--I am shy and sensitive and it is an absurd act you are smart enough to see this, save me, etc. The same crap many many much older women have fallen for when they want to rescue a (hopefully much less toxic) loser.


Completely agree. I also was not goth and didn't listen to his music, but, in case you weren't around back then or are just going by the pictures, this was very much the narrative. The message was that Brian Warner was separate and different from Marilyn Manson, which was just a public persona/character.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: