What if someone said all black women....? All white women are not mad at her for opening a car door or because she is biracial. |
Or It could be nice to hold the door so a woman could gather her dress without it dragging across curb or door of car, or to allow her to comfortable get in a car while wearing a dress/skirt or to show that I value her by doing something simple and kind. It doesn’t mean I feel like she any less that me or need a knights in shining armor. It doesn’t make her appear weak in my eyes. It is a kind thing to do. If my wife gets a glass out of cabinet for me, does that imply I am incapable of doing it myself, no. My wife is the strongest person I know. She doesn’t need me to do anything for her, but she accepts my kindness it is a part of me. |
If you are teaching your daughters that the way a woman shows respect to a man is that whenever he needs a drink she is to get him a glass from the cabinet; that he shouldn't have to get a glass himself; and that she should only get glasses for a man but not for other women...then yes I think that is sexist too. As for women needing help from men to keep their long flowing dresses clean....I won't go there! |
I agree with you. And my DH would never assume that about women and luggage, and frankly, most people just ask him for help since he is so tall. I think it's the people who are clearly struggling (regardless of age or gender--and we've all seen the ones who very nearly bang seated passengers on the head with a baggage going rogue) that perhaps are the iffy ones. Maybe the lashing out is out of embarrassment. That said, I think there are some people in general who are just looking to be offended. That, to me, doesn't help anyone's path to equality. And I appreciate the civil discussions of it. |
You get pretty wound up about this. No wonder so many guys are confused. What used to be simple manners is now sexist. My son will sometimes open the door for his girlfriend, even though she is more than capable of doing it herself. |
I am not wound up at all. I think this has been a pretty rational, calm discussion by DCUM standards with varying points of view being expressed pretty respectfully. I think the sentence I bolded is true. In the past the general societal view of women meant that men were taught to do things for women - that despite being well intended - were still sexist. Women were seen as unable to do many of the things that men could so men very kindly helped them and did for them all the things that they couldn't do because they were women. Now that many of us see women as being able to do many things themselves, those kind gestures that were rooted in sexism are no longer really a good thing. I do agree it is confusing for men - if they were taught - you need to do x,y, and z for women (just because they are women) and now women are saying, actually I don't need you to do that for me just because I am a woman - I can see it would be confusing for sure. Hopefully within a generation or two fewer men will be raised thinking they need to do x, y, and z for women - just because they are women and they will see women more as their equal. They will still be respectful and kind - in the same way though that they would be respectful and kind to other men. |
|
Before cars, men with manners held the door and let the woman precede him into a building. Were the doors apparently too heavy? Now I'm wondering where this all came from.
|
I think protection. If you went through a door and left your woman behind you, someone might grab her and drag her off. If you open the door and let her through, you can keep an eye on her. Plus the fact that in the olden days, doors were super heavy (solid wood instead of the hollow core crap we have now). And the PP's post about big skirts was probably also a factor. If you've ever worn a full-length big skirted dress (those of us who went to prom or were bridesmaids in the 80's know what I'm talking about), it took a lot of management that occupied your hands. I personally thing the whole thing is kind of stupid now, as does my teen daughter. I'm not going to pillory some guy for doing it, but I will do sort of a double-take. People should be respectful and considerate of each other generally. Don't let a door slam in someone's face. If someone has their arms full or is pushing a stroller, open a door for them. If you're already up and someone wants a drink, it's kind to get them a glass. If you're walking with someone, try not to walk faster than they can comfortably keep up with. I feel like all of this runs both ways. GIrls maybe are more socially conditioned to think this way already, and maybe boys need a little explicit coaching to think this way (based on my experience with men and women riding the metro, in which men are twice as likely to keep their backpacks on and wack you in the face with them when they turn around, plus the whole mans-preading seat problem). |
Pp you quoted here. Re: the bolded.... Ds grew up with DH opening doors for me. Not because I'm female. I have mobility limitations and sometimes do need help. I know ds doesn't always hold doors open. |
No. You're wound up. |
My prom dress, my wedding dress. Both poofy so yes that makes sense. |
For sure. Doing something because someone needs help is completely different than doing something for someone just because of their gender. |
Hahaha....something tells me that pp isn't exactly a beauty queen. |
Np: Meghan Markle also said this to a group of schoolboys: You have your mothers, sisters, girlfriends, friends in your life, protect them. I thought women don’t need to be protected by men, we’re capable of taking care of ourselves. |
+1 I hate when people say that women need to be protected! We are not delicate little flowers! Today is International Women's Day, how about we take a break from insulting and infantilizing women just for today, because I know it is too much to ask for it to stop all together. |