I dare say that a large portion of my patients are MDs, their spouses, and children. Stop proclaiming things that you know nothing about or at least state: it is my opinion that... And no, contrary to your belief, scientific conclusions are not just made willy-nilly to fit a scientist's narrative. Do you have any idea how many hours of research and testing goes into proving or disproving a hypothesis? |
Of course she doesn't, because she uses basic logic... basic, narrow-minded, short sighted, intolerant and unsubstantiated logic. |
No, only people who don't know much about science believe anything similar to what you're saying. Sure, some people will fake results and make baseless claims. The scientific method has a baked-in way of dealing with that -- results must be capable of being replicated by independent research teams. It's a source of considerable joy to researchers to expose bogus results and fraud in science. This is why science has given us air travel, space travel, antibiotics, cancer treatments, vaccinations, organ transplants, advanced manufacturing, etc. "Base logic" alone without the scientific method got us caves. And sometimes fire if we were lucky. And burning witches. And worshiping volcanoes. And human sacrifice. I'm a trained in psychology, but it's my understanding that exactly zero reputable "people in the medical community" think that "psychology isn't science at all." They DO think that there's a crisis of replicability in modern psychology research, which is being addressed by the baked in process of the scientific method --- people are trying to reproduce claims and rejecting research that can't be reproduced. Also, you may not be aware, but psychology is not the same as psychiatry, which I think is the field primarily concerned when PPs talk about the DSM. Because it's a medical specialty, I'm certain that no reputable physicians think that psychiatry is not a a science. |
| *I'm NOT trained |
| I would love to see the research that transgenderism is not a psychiatric condition. Are there any links to share with peer reviewed research? |
+1 |
Except that it's happening more and more, now that being transgendered is acceptable in some circles. |
Sorry, but that's not what I'd tell my DD. And I love her too, more than just about anyone on earth. Signed, another human |
Science and medical issues, my friend, have nothing to do with whether or not one is "closed minded." |
Sure. One that the funder of the study does or does not want to see. |
Surely you don't think that means she's not bisexual now? Uhm....
|
Yes, that's why we still live in caves and medicine focuses on rectifying the humors, bleeding and fairground patent medicines. Oh, wait, that's not actually true. We have modern medicine, vaccinations, skyscrapers and all kinds of other good stuff because science works. It's not about "who funded the study." But clearly education in this country isn't going as well. |
No, but your ignorance of both has a lot to do with your close mindedness. Several physicians on this thread have already explained to you that you totally misunderstand the medical terms that you are trying to use, and to the extent that you believe that gender or even biological sex are binary, you don't know much about science. |
Most bisexual women I know ended up with men, but some sure did bang a lot of women on the way...
|
Yup. We’re gay and I’ll be stunned if DS isn’t straight. Sometimes you just know. |