$24 billion NYC public schools only accepted 7 black students (of 895) to top magnet high schoool

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


I'd guess that the home lives of most poor black/Latino kids are pretty different from those of poor kids with Asian immigrant parents. For example, I'd imagine that the level of trauma exposure would be a lot higher in the former.


and why is that, shouldn't we be addressing that instead of saying everything is racist?


The definition of institutional racism is to create an institution that has barriers for 1 race and not others.


?


Do you not understand what institutional racism is? Go read up on it. Very relevant.


that has nothing to do with this conversation unless again you are arguing that the test is racist. If that's your argument you are going to have to make it a lot better for me to believe you
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


Many of the Chinese kids I knew at Stuy were straight up poor by NYC standards. Their parents worked very menial jobs in Chinatown and Flushing. Some worked to help support their families, and many took on tons of responsibility at an early age because their parents knew no English.


My neighbor is Chinese, she was a doctor in China. She qualifies for the MPDU in MoCo because the US does not recognize her degree and she does not work as a doctor.

For every one of those examples, there are more examples of under educated Asian immigrants working low level jobs whose kids do well in school.

Many Asian immigrants see education as a means to get out of poverty for their children (and the rest of the family), so they are heavily invested in their children's education. That's all it is. That's all it comes down to.


If the kids getting into Stuy are from gang ridden neighborhoods with lead paint in the walls and parents with mental illness we need to clone them.

Do you think the 45% low income students, 90% of them who are Asians live in luxury? Or do you perhaps think they also live in old buildings with lead paint on the walls? Also, mental illness is a serious issue in the Asian community. It's just never talked about, and certainly people never seek help for it.

As for gangs, have you never heard of Chinese gangs in NYC?

http://gangstersinc.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-deadly-battle-for-control-over-new-york-s-chinatown

When do the excuses stop? Asian immigrants have gone through racism, desperation, gang violence and extreme poverty just as other groups have.

I am Asian American. I went to a gang infested school and grew up low income. My parents didn't speak English. Like many others, we -- the children - had to translate everything for them.. from school forms to doctors' visits.


Wow. I didn't know any of this, first time hearing about Asian American gangs. However, I am willing to accept that I don't know everything about the challenges poor Asian Americans face growing up in NYC.

The question is, are you willing to accept that other ethnic groups may also face challenges--some of them rooted in longstanding historical oppression--that you don't fully grasp?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


Because NYT readers hate whites but are fine with Asian Americans (as long as they stay quiet re. Affirmative action)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


I'd guess that the home lives of most poor black/Latino kids are pretty different from those of poor kids with Asian immigrant parents. For example, I'd imagine that the level of trauma exposure would be a lot higher in the former.


and why is that, shouldn't we be addressing that instead of saying everything is racist?


The definition of institutional racism is to create an institution that has barriers for 1 race and not others.


?


Do you not understand what institutional racism is? Go read up on it. Very relevant.


that has nothing to do with this conversation unless again you are arguing that the test is racist. If that's your argument you are going to have to make it a lot better for me to believe you


Please go read about institutional racism. It isn’t just the test. The test scores are the symptom.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


I'd guess that the home lives of most poor black/Latino kids are pretty different from those of poor kids with Asian immigrant parents. For example, I'd imagine that the level of trauma exposure would be a lot higher in the former.


and why is that, shouldn't we be addressing that instead of saying everything is racist?


The definition of institutional racism is to create an institution that has barriers for 1 race and not others.


?


Do you not understand what institutional racism is? Go read up on it. Very relevant.


that has nothing to do with this conversation unless again you are arguing that the test is racist. If that's your argument you are going to have to make it a lot better for me to believe you


Please go read about institutional racism. It isn’t just the test. The test scores are the symptom.



lol no poor asians are doing fine. It's a choice on what to focus on there chief.
Anonymous
Schumer's daughter went to Stuyvesant H.S. I used to look at the school's auction items a decade ago: private tour by Schumer of the U.N.

Now that's access.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


I'd guess that the home lives of most poor black/Latino kids are pretty different from those of poor kids with Asian immigrant parents. For example, I'd imagine that the level of trauma exposure would be a lot higher in the former.


and why is that, shouldn't we be addressing that instead of saying everything is racist?


The definition of institutional racism is to create an institution that has barriers for 1 race and not others.


?


Do you not understand what institutional racism is? Go read up on it. Very relevant.


that has nothing to do with this conversation unless again you are arguing that the test is racist. If that's your argument you are going to have to make it a lot better for me to believe you


Please go read about institutional racism. It isn’t just the test. The test scores are the symptom.



lol no poor asians are doing fine. It's a choice on what to focus on there chief.


Who said anything about Asians? How about everyone else? Is **everyone** doing fine?


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Freshman acceptance:
7 black
33 Latino
587 Asian
194 white

NYCPS district overall is 67% black/Latino, 15% white, 15% Asian. Stuyvesant High School is comparable in selectivity to TJ, but I suppose a bit more prestigious, with more national prominence. This is a huge story.

What is going on here? How are Asians so wildly overrepresented and black and Latin kids so underprepared in a $24 billion annually system?


On the one hand: New York ought to make sure that just about all of the kids who took the test and scored at a minimum level ought to have access to a solid score, with qualified teachers, access to AP classes and tests, etc.

The district can't keep hard-working Asian kids from getting a great education.

But it looks as if only 3.6% of the African-American kids who took that test received offers from any of the test schools.

That means the system is shutting out a lot of serious, bright, hard-working African-American kids with great grades and pushing them into weak schools. That's terrible. Schools need to find ways to nurture and encourage those kids, not slam a door in their face.

Second, one problem not being discussed is that putting kids in schools with few African-American or Latino students is bad for the students in those schools. They're going to end up living in a world in which they're going to have to relate to people who are African-American and Latino, without having much actual experience with relating to people from those groups.

I'm a white person who's the product of those kinds of schools, and I think that kind of segregation is crippling. I can pretend that I'm so wonderfully enlightened and relate to all people the same wonderful way, but that's not actually the truth. It's hard for me to believe that other products of similar schools are all that much more well-equipped for a diverse world than I am. The whole point of South Park is that we're absolutely not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


So all of those poor and MC kids had the same upbringing? Same home environment? Same school environment - are they are the same schools?

This doesn't break down the SES by race so we don't know how the scores map to race AND SES.



I believe that 90 percent of the FARMS students at Stuy are Asians.


Source?


This is borne out at Stuyvesant. While 75% of current students are Asian-Americans, they also, according to Department of Education statistics, constitute over 90% of students qualifying for free or subsidized lunch, the measure of poverty used in educational circles.

https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/stuyvesant-serves-needy-minorities-article-1.3944199

From the article...

The Mayor's Office of Operations' annual report on poverty in the city, released this month, noted that 24.1% of Asian-American New Yorkers lived in poverty in 2016, the latest year for available statistics, compared to 23.9% for Hispanics, 19.2% for blacks and 13.4% for whites.

This is borne out at Stuyvesant. While 75% of current students are Asian-Americans, they also, according to Department of Education statistics, constitute over 90% of students qualifying for free or subsidized lunch, the measure of poverty used in educational circles.


Read the article.. Like I said, Asian immigrants view education as a means to get out of poverty, so they invest heavily in it. That's really all it is. It's not because they are smarter or better. They just work harder at it and really invest in their children's education.


Agree. And that’s a common view in many immigrant communities, not just Asian ones. My parents were immigrants who had an elementary-level education. They bought the cheapest house in the best school district. My sister and I knew that school was our number one job, and our parents did what they could to make sure we could focus on it. Both my sister and I have degrees from Ivy League schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


Maggie Haberman, NYT, quoted Ruhle to say:
“White students generally have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

I’m not sure why Maggie used white when Asians are the ones dominating this system.


The simple truth is that Asian relative overperformance demonstrates that “discrimination” is not a significant driver of outcomes on this sort of test. It has always been a very inconvenient truth for those who insist all groups are equally talented, generally ignored because of that inconvenience, and because Asians didn’t seem to want to make a big issue out of it. Now there is a critical mass of Asians who are going to resist getting shafted in the name of diversity. Will be interesting to see how that all works out.


You think it's a level playing field? So it's just pure talent that is being compared by these tests?


um yeah. There are poor and middle class asian kids who are getting in. That throws out race and SES as an excuse


I'd guess that the home lives of most poor black/Latino kids are pretty different from those of poor kids with Asian immigrant parents. For example, I'd imagine that the level of trauma exposure would be a lot higher in the former.


and why is that, shouldn't we be addressing that instead of saying everything is racist?


The definition of institutional racism is to create an institution that has barriers for 1 race and not others.


?


Do you not understand what institutional racism is? Go read up on it. Very relevant.


that has nothing to do with this conversation unless again you are arguing that the test is racist. If that's your argument you are going to have to make it a lot better for me to believe you


Please go read about institutional racism. It isn’t just the test. The test scores are the symptom.



DP: please do some test prep, don't waste time reading "institutional racism" BS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


That’s the problem. It’s merit based admission process. They must be racists.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


That’s the problem. It’s merit based admission process. They must be racists.


+1.

If a plane crashes, the problem is never the pilot or the plane or the weather.

It's centuries-old institutional racism. My anscestors built this country, so I demand a free private airplane that never crashes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Freshman acceptance:
7 black
33 Latino
587 Asian
194 white

NYCPS district overall is 67% black/Latino, 15% white, 15% Asian. Stuyvesant High School is comparable in selectivity to TJ, but I suppose a bit more prestigious, with more national prominence. This is a huge story.

What is going on here? How are Asians so wildly overrepresented and black and Latin kids so underprepared in a $24 billion annually system?


On the one hand: New York ought to make sure that just about all of the kids who took the test and scored at a minimum level ought to have access to a solid score, with qualified teachers, access to AP classes and tests, etc.

The district can't keep hard-working Asian kids from getting a great education.

But it looks as if only 3.6% of the African-American kids who took that test received offers from any of the test schools.

That means the system is shutting out a lot of serious, bright, hard-working African-American kids with great grades and pushing them into weak schools. That's terrible. Schools need to find ways to nurture and encourage those kids, not slam a door in their face.

Second, one problem not being discussed is that putting kids in schools with few African-American or Latino students is bad for the students in those schools. They're going to end up living in a world in which they're going to have to relate to people who are African-American and Latino, without having much actual experience with relating to people from those groups.

I'm a white person who's the product of those kinds of schools, and I think that kind of segregation is crippling. I can pretend that I'm so wonderfully enlightened and relate to all people the same wonderful way, but that's not actually the truth. It's hard for me to believe that other products of similar schools are all that much more well-equipped for a diverse world than I am. The whole point of South Park is that we're absolutely not.


So what do you suggest they do? Accept more Black and Latinx kids and fewer Asian American kids? Because it never ever seems to be on the table to admit fewer white kids.

Also, putting kids who are hardworking and bright but not prepared for the rigor of a highly competitive high school is doing them a disservice. Hey will drop out when they can’t compete. Earlier intervention is what’s needed, but schools can’t remedy lack of parental support or engagement.

My parents were dirt poor when they came to the US. Worked menial jobs until they mastered English, but even while they were both working ridiculous hours, they focused on their kids’ educations. They’d go without food to make sure we had books and supplies we needed. We sometimes didn’t have heat on in the winter, but damn, we were supported in our studies. Knowing the sacrifices our parents made, there was no shirking homework or doing less than our best. No TV, no fun activities on weekends, no movies, no trips to the zoo.

When people talk about Asian Americans making sacrifices, they have no idea of the scale of the sacrifice or the discipline that Asian American parents and kids embrace. Education becomes an all-encompassing family goal.
Anonymous
Improve all schools so someone who doesn’t get into the magnet school isn’t disappointed. The magnet school becomes less about access to superior education and rather matching students to their proper level of academic rigor.

No one wins if it’s a zero sum game. It’s disappointing however that this discussion on racial disparity becomes more charged when Asian Americans are the majority. I hope the discourse stays away from “blaming” Asian Americans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“This is actually tricky -
Admission to Stuyvesant is determined by a single test avail to all middle school students in NYC.There are no soft criteria-no interviews,no legacy favoritism, no strings to be pulled. It’s all abt test score which determines if you can handle academics.”

- Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC


That’s the problem. It’s merit based admission process. They must be racists.


+1.

If a plane crashes, the problem is never the pilot or the plane or the weather.

It's centuries-old institutional racism. My anscestors built this country, so I demand a free private airplane that never crashes.


And I demand to be the pilot, because I'm black and there are way too many Asian and white pilots.
post reply Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: