Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Someone asked, "If the man or men coming forward (supposedly) to claim responsibility for the attack on Ford can give names, dates, and addresses, will you believe them?"
Maybe. It still does not explain away the overall pattern of behavior Mark Judge put in his book, reflected by the year book, and other witnesses who have come forward. It still does not explain the gap between Kavanaugh's interview where he indicates he was mostly a good, church going kid, and the picture painted of him as a pass-out drunk (judge's book) who gets belligerent and inappropriate (college roommate).
Folks have indicated that they think Ford is a political operative, that this is part of a conspiracy. That theory is weakened as more and more people come forward echoing similar stories about Kavanaugh.
If an accuser can be a bribed, political operative, why couldn't a man or men coming forward to claim responsibility also be a bribed political operative?
First we were told Ford is a liar and who wait 40 years to report an assault? Now you're willing to believe she's telling the truth about an experience she had, it just wasn't Kavanaugh who did it?
There are many post where people said maybe it happened, but she had the wrong guy. Why is that not a posibility?