Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

The FBI can and has done background investigations before. New information has been provided about this candidate, so an investigation is warranted. Why is this so hard? You would only reject the idea of an investigation if you have an agenda.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Kavenaugh now being investigated for a SERIES of rape attacks in south Florida area during summer of 1988. Several cold cases being reopened in light of "new suspect" surfacing.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/meeting-on-rapes-degradation-at-notorious-floridas-womens-prison-draws-a-packed-house/ar-BBM9sWV



This guy is a SERIAL RAPIST. I'm sure he's probably done other things we aren't aware of, too. I wouldn't put murder past him, especially if any of his victims ever resisted.

Jeff is not removing this? Wow. It has nothing to do with Kavanaugh at all.

I agree. I reported it. But, still here.

I reported it too. Amazing.

Folks, occasionally I have to get up from the computer. Unlike you who appear to never be away. I removed the post as soon as I saw it. These threads are long enough without you clogging it further with you whining. If you keep this sort of thing up, don’t bother asking why you have been blocked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

The FBI can and has done background investigations before. New information has been provided about this candidate, so an investigation is warranted. Why is this so hard? You would only reject the idea of an investigation if you have an agenda.

...WHEN CREDIBLE information comes forward. That has not yet happened.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

At least since Anita Hill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

He has provided a statement to the SJC stating that he denies all allegations. Serves the same as a sworn statement.
He HAS cleared it up. You clearly don’t believe him.

But is is not present to be questioned. In light of new details that will emerge today, it seems like Judge's presence would be helpful, no?

Just stop. A letter is not the same as sworn statement! It's just a letter. There is no legal jeopardy for lying in a letter.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

At least since Anita Hill.

Lest you forget... Anita Hill was a federal employee making a complaint against another federal employee.
And, they looked into it as part of the background investigation that was ongoing BEFORE the confirmation hearings took place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know this will just become another 200 page thread with the same 5 post repeated over and over in different ways right?

By the same one or two Trump supporters who apparently have nothing to do in life but incessantly post the same Fox talking points. Jeff should just cut them off (I am not saying all conservative posters, I think all of us can identify the one or two true trolls).

[Anonymous]

Trump upon seeing GOP’s woman prosecutor: what senator is that??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

He has provided a statement to the SJC stating that he denies all allegations. Serves the same as a sworn statement.
He HAS cleared it up. You clearly don’t believe him.

But is is not present to be questioned. In light of new details that will emerge today, it seems like Judge's presence would be helpful, no?

Just stop. A letter is not the same as sworn statement! It's just a letter. There is no legal jeopardy for lying in a letter.

Senator Hatch Office
?
Verified account

@senorrinhatch
Following Following @senorrinhatch
More
Additionally, every letter/statement/interview made to @SenJudiciary carries a legal consequence for not telling the truth, just like with sworn testimony. (18 USC 1001)

Letters like Mark Judge’s fulfill same need as sworn testimony or an FBI interview

[Anonymous]

I, too, don’t understand why Mark Judge isn’t subpoenaed.

Someone around page 215 of thread 3 said that it’s insane to think that Dr. Ford would a) make this up b) wait 35 years c) name her attempted rapist’s best friend as being a witness. I mean if she were lying, she’d be galactically stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, Christine Ford's alleged witnesses refuse to testify under oath in her defense.

Um, imagine that. Not everyone wants to be a liar.

Women NEVER lie. Once you accept this you will be able to understand what will happen today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’ll get to a floor vote and will be voted down.

This is what I believe also will end up happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know who can clear most of this up? Mark Judge. Under oath. I CAN. NOT. BELIEVE. He has not been subpoenaed. I will continue to repeat this until someone gives me a valid reason why we wouldn’t subpoena him, other than his and Kavanaugh’s guilt.

He has provided a statement to the SJC stating that he denies all allegations. Serves the same as a sworn statement.
He HAS cleared it up. You clearly don’t believe him.

But is is not present to be questioned. In light of new details that will emerge today, it seems like Judge's presence would be helpful, no?

Just stop. A letter is not the same as sworn statement! It's just a letter. There is no legal jeopardy for lying in a letter.

Senator Hatch Office
?
Verified account

@senorrinhatch
Following Following @senorrinhatch
More
Additionally, every letter/statement/interview made to @SenJudiciary carries a legal consequence for not telling the truth, just like with sworn testimony. (18 USC 1001)

Letters like Mark Judge’s fulfill same need as sworn testimony or an FBI interview

Lol. How many clarifying questions can you ask a letter? How often has the Senate followed up on punishments for those who have lied to the Senate in a letter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I, too, don’t understand why Mark Judge isn’t subpoenaed.

Someone around page 215 of thread 3 said that it’s insane to think that Dr. Ford would a) make this up b) wait 35 years c) name her attempted rapist’s best friend as being a witness. I mean if she were lying, she’d be galactically stupid.

Just too late for this. She probably thinks she is telling the truth. But memories change over time.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why isn't ANYONE reporting the alleged "gang rapes" to the Montgomery County Police Department?

They apparently want to investigate, but can't until SOMEONE makes a report.

Are you going to ask this on every single page of every thread? The victims have requested an FBI investigation which is the same agency that investigated the Anita Hill case and John Tower cases.

Since when FBI were given an authority to investigate sexual crimes? It is jurisdiction of the local police and should be referred to them.

At least since Anita Hill.

Chairman Grassley’s explanation of the difference in these two situations.....