Husband confessed to killing pregnant wife and their two daughters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timeline doesn't add up. I think he killed those poor kids before she got home at 2 am.

He would have been racing against the clock to kill 3 people, bury them, and clean up from 2 am-5 am (if he did indeed leave at 5 am and there's evidence to support this).

After reading everything put out, I agree with this. The events afterward happened too quickly, and if the police did a welfare check on Monday, he would have already had to have everything cleaned up.

As I understand it, he didn't bury them, at least not the kids. he took the bodies to work with him and dropped them in oil tanks at work. If he killed them in a manner that did not involve a lot of blood loss, maybe by asphyxiation, cleanup at home would be minimal besides getting bodies out of the house and getting in character for the TV crews.

Stangling one person in the 'spur of the moment'...okay.

But three people? Its not a quick enough method that one of the girls wouldn't have gotten away if that was the case.

It probably wasn't all three at the same time in the spur of the moment. Maybe there was an accident with one of the kids and the mother refused to help him cover up and he snapped or he killed the kids to get at the mother and finished her when she got home and found out. And they were so young, no way they could have gotten away in a locked house.

Yes, but it was 2:00am. He was out of the house by 5:00am.

You think he argued with the mother for thirty minutes and then strangled her (5 minutes for a struggling adult) and then ran after the other kid for 5-10 minutes and strangled them in 1-2 minutes.

Leaving him...2 hours to think up the perfect disposal plan, pick up, carry and deposit bodies in his car, lock up/turn off lights, high-tail it to his work address which is 24 minutes away (15 miles) at 4AM?

And then back to house by 5AM. I mean he could have done it but I think he had to have been eyeing those oil barrels as disposal units for a long time prior to that.

Except it wasn't the perfect disposal plan. It was actually a really, REALLY stupid one because of course it directly tied him to the murders. If he had preplanned this or had time to think he would have done just about anything else with the bodies.
I think it happened in a fit of rage when she returned home--they got into a fight and he flipped out. He probably killed her first but in front on the kids and then finished them off first because he was worried that at least the 4 year old would talk.
At that point he was just acting on animal impulses.

(I can't believe I'm typing this all out).

I don't think it was that stupid though. Look at Drew Peterson. He killed TWO of his wives but was only convicted of one murder because they found the body of one of the wives. If the oil barrels weren't searched (and he led them to them) he could have gotten off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timeline doesn't add up. I think he killed those poor kids before she got home at 2 am.

He would have been racing against the clock to kill 3 people, bury them, and clean up from 2 am-5 am (if he did indeed leave at 5 am and there's evidence to support this).

After reading everything put out, I agree with this. The events afterward happened too quickly, and if the police did a welfare check on Monday, he would have already had to have everything cleaned up.

As I understand it, he didn't bury them, at least not the kids. he took the bodies to work with him and dropped them in oil tanks at work. If he killed them in a manner that did not involve a lot of blood loss, maybe by asphyxiation, cleanup at home would be minimal besides getting bodies out of the house and getting in character for the TV crews.

Stangling one person in the 'spur of the moment'...okay.

But three people? Its not a quick enough method that one of the girls wouldn't have gotten away if that was the case.

It probably wasn't all three at the same time in the spur of the moment. Maybe there was an accident with one of the kids and the mother refused to help him cover up and he snapped or he killed the kids to get at the mother and finished her when she got home and found out. And they were so young, no way they could have gotten away in a locked house.

Yes, but it was 2:00am. He was out of the house by 5:00am.

You think he argued with the mother for thirty minutes and then strangled her (5 minutes for a struggling adult) and then ran after the other kid for 5-10 minutes and strangled them in 1-2 minutes.

Leaving him...2 hours to think up the perfect disposal plan, pick up, carry and deposit bodies in his car, lock up/turn off lights, high-tail it to his work address which is 24 minutes away (15 miles) at 4AM?

And then back to house by 5AM. I mean he could have done it but I think he had to have been eyeing those oil barrels as disposal units for a long time prior to that.

Except it wasn't the perfect disposal plan. It was actually a really, REALLY stupid one because of course it directly tied him to the murders. If he had preplanned this or had time to think he would have done just about anything else with the bodies.
I think it happened in a fit of rage when she returned home--they got into a fight and he flipped out. He probably killed her first but in front on the kids and then finished them off first because he was worried that at least the 4 year old would talk.
At that point he was just acting on animal impulses.

(I can't believe I'm typing this all out).

I don't think it was that stupid though. Look at Drew Peterson. He killed TWO of his wives but was only convicted of one murder because they found the body of one of the wives. If the oil barrels weren't searched (and he led them to them) he could have gotten off.

Also Colorado has the death penalty. So the police probably had surveillance of his car in the early morning hours and told him that if he cooperated they'd take it off the table.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timeline doesn't add up. I think he killed those poor kids before she got home at 2 am.

He would have been racing against the clock to kill 3 people, bury them, and clean up from 2 am-5 am (if he did indeed leave at 5 am and there's evidence to support this).

After reading everything put out, I agree with this. The events afterward happened too quickly, and if the police did a welfare check on Monday, he would have already had to have everything cleaned up.

As I understand it, he didn't bury them, at least not the kids. he took the bodies to work with him and dropped them in oil tanks at work. If he killed them in a manner that did not involve a lot of blood loss, maybe by asphyxiation, cleanup at home would be minimal besides getting bodies out of the house and getting in character for the TV crews.

Stangling one person in the 'spur of the moment'...okay.

But three people? Its not a quick enough method that one of the girls wouldn't have gotten away if that was the case.

It probably wasn't all three at the same time in the spur of the moment. Maybe there was an accident with one of the kids and the mother refused to help him cover up and he snapped or he killed the kids to get at the mother and finished her when she got home and found out. And they were so young, no way they could have gotten away in a locked house.

Yes, but it was 2:00am. He was out of the house by 5:00am.

You think he argued with the mother for thirty minutes and then strangled her (5 minutes for a struggling adult) and then ran after the other kid for 5-10 minutes and strangled them in 1-2 minutes.

Leaving him...2 hours to think up the perfect disposal plan, pick up, carry and deposit bodies in his car, lock up/turn off lights, high-tail it to his work address which is 24 minutes away (15 miles) at 4AM?

And then back to house by 5AM. I mean he could have done it but I think he had to have been eyeing those oil barrels as disposal units for a long time prior to that.

Except it wasn't the perfect disposal plan. It was actually a really, REALLY stupid one because of course it directly tied him to the murders. If he had preplanned this or had time to think he would have done just about anything else with the bodies.
I think it happened in a fit of rage when she returned home--they got into a fight and he flipped out. He probably killed her first but in front on the kids and then finished them off first because he was worried that at least the 4 year old would talk.
At that point he was just acting on animal impulses.

(I can't believe I'm typing this all out).

Looks like she was going to divorce him with the absences. I am betting she indicated that when the fight developed. He saw child support to 3 kids for many years. He would be in debt forever plus couldn't move on easily with 3 small kids. I think another stupid Scott Peterson though this was more impulsive. She was no doubt a victim of abuse which probably worsened.

Yep this guy is a bad actor.

[Anonymous]

I saw a news report that both husband and wife had been arrested several times in NC before they made the move to CO. No specifics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timeline doesn't add up. I think he killed those poor kids before she got home at 2 am.

He would have been racing against the clock to kill 3 people, bury them, and clean up from 2 am-5 am (if he did indeed leave at 5 am and there's evidence to support this).

After reading everything put out, I agree with this. The events afterward happened too quickly, and if the police did a welfare check on Monday, he would have already had to have everything cleaned up.

As I understand it, he didn't bury them, at least not the kids. he took the bodies to work with him and dropped them in oil tanks at work. If he killed them in a manner that did not involve a lot of blood loss, maybe by asphyxiation, cleanup at home would be minimal besides getting bodies out of the house and getting in character for the TV crews.

Stangling one person in the 'spur of the moment'...okay.

But three people? Its not a quick enough method that one of the girls wouldn't have gotten away if that was the case.

It probably wasn't all three at the same time in the spur of the moment. Maybe there was an accident with one of the kids and the mother refused to help him cover up and he snapped or he killed the kids to get at the mother and finished her when she got home and found out. And they were so young, no way they could have gotten away in a locked house.

Yes, but it was 2:00am. He was out of the house by 5:00am.

You think he argued with the mother for thirty minutes and then strangled her (5 minutes for a struggling adult) and then ran after the other kid for 5-10 minutes and strangled them in 1-2 minutes.

Leaving him...2 hours to think up the perfect disposal plan, pick up, carry and deposit bodies in his car, lock up/turn off lights, high-tail it to his work address which is 24 minutes away (15 miles) at 4AM?

And then back to house by 5AM. I mean he could have done it but I think he had to have been eyeing those oil barrels as disposal units for a long time prior to that.

Except it wasn't the perfect disposal plan. It was actually a really, REALLY stupid one because of course it directly tied him to the murders. If he had preplanned this or had time to think he would have done just about anything else with the bodies.
I think it happened in a fit of rage when she returned home--they got into a fight and he flipped out. He probably killed her first but in front on the kids and then finished them off first because he was worried that at least the 4 year old would talk.
At that point he was just acting on animal impulses.

(I can't believe I'm typing this all out).

I don't think it was that stupid though. Look at Drew Peterson. He killed TWO of his wives but was only convicted of one murder because they found the body of one of the wives. If the oil barrels weren't searched (and he led them to them) he could have gotten off.

Also Colorado has the death penalty. So the police probably had surveillance of his car in the early morning hours and told him that if he cooperated they'd take it off the table.

Makes sense why he confessed, if so.

[Anonymous]

I just hope that whatever happened, that it happened very quickly and the little ones and their mother were gone before they knew what was happening.

I just can't imagine why someone would do this. Why not leave and disappear yourself if you don't want that life anymore? Now they are dead and he's in jail and for what? Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just hope that whatever happened, that it happened very quickly and the little ones and their mother were gone before they knew what was happening.

I just can't imagine why someone would do this. Why not leave and disappear yourself if you don't want that life anymore? Now they are dead and he's in jail and for what? Why?

And do what exactly?

She's have his bank accounts and cards frozen. He'd be reported missing so any activity on his driver's liscense and passport would be flagged.

He didn't have any money, so its not like he could pop up on the French Riviera anyway.

If he did disappear for a year and she found out he was alive - judges would immediately start garnishing his paycheck for support.

90% certain of 20 years of misery and payments. 10% hope of getting away with murder.

Also I mean...it sounds like he snapped.

[Anonymous]

How terrified they must've been. Awful. How can a person do this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just hope that whatever happened, that it happened very quickly and the little ones and their mother were gone before they knew what was happening.

I just can't imagine why someone would do this. Why not leave and disappear yourself if you don't want that life anymore? Now they are dead and he's in jail and for what? Why?

And do what exactly?

She's have his bank accounts and cards frozen. He'd be reported missing so any activity on his driver's liscense and passport would be flagged.

He didn't have any money, so its not like he could pop up on the French Riviera anyway.

If he did disappear for a year and she found out he was alive - judges would immediately start garnishing his paycheck for support.

90% certain of 20 years of misery and payments. 10% hope of getting away with murder.

Also I mean...it sounds like he snapped.

Sounds like you are a MRA.

Don’t have kids you can’t support.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just hope that whatever happened, that it happened very quickly and the little ones and their mother were gone before they knew what was happening.

I just can't imagine why someone would do this. Why not leave and disappear yourself if you don't want that life anymore? Now they are dead and he's in jail and for what? Why?

And do what exactly?

She's have his bank accounts and cards frozen. He'd be reported missing so any activity on his driver's liscense and passport would be flagged.

He didn't have any money, so its not like he could pop up on the French Riviera anyway.

If he did disappear for a year and she found out he was alive - judges would immediately start garnishing his paycheck for support.

90% certain of 20 years of misery and payments. 10% hope of getting away with murder.

Also I mean...it sounds like he snapped.

Sounds like you are a MRA.

Don’t have kids you can’t support.

A what?

I'm just being realistic.

[Anonymous]

Why ask your wife to have baby #3 if the thought of 20 years of financially supporting a child would cause you to “snap”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why ask your wife to have baby #3 if the thought of 20 years of financially supporting a child would cause you to “snap”?

Maybe that was when they were still trying to work things out and before his alleged affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why ask your wife to have baby #3 if the thought of 20 years of financially supporting a child would cause you to “snap”?

Maybe that was when they were still trying to work things out and before his alleged affair.

She was 15 weeks pregnant, so that’s a long time to adjust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why ask your wife to have baby #3 if the thought of 20 years of financially supporting a child would cause you to “snap”?

Maybe that was when they were still trying to work things out and before his alleged affair.

She was 15 weeks pregnant, so that’s a long time to adjust.

Who the hell said he had an affair?

For that matter - why were people up thread saying she had an affair?

Newsflash, maybe he just didn't like her. Or she didn't like him. In either case, he killed four people that night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet he killed her because she told him the third kid wasn't his, and that she was leaving him for her AP, the father of #3.

I don't know. One article I read mentioned that her neighbor/friend (who is actually the wife of the couple who let him stay with them after his wife & daughters went missing; they've now spoken out to apologize for defending him) said that she (Shannan, that is) had confided last week that she suspected her husband of infidelity. But has then elaborated something like "but he has no game so I don't know..."

Another theory I wonder about is that maybe he snapped and did something to one or both of the girls while she was away on her trip and he was (presumably) watching them. After killing one kid, there's not much you can do to "go back"...

Re people hating on her for being part of a MLM, stop. This is no time to victim shame. However, I do think it's potentially pertinent in that some articles seem to be latching onto the fact that they had filed for bankruptcy several years ago, but that the family's financial state "seems to have taken a turn" lately based on all the traveling the family had done, often paid for fully by Shannan's company. Anyone who knows anything about MLMs knows that is utter bullshit. It's also relevant in that (to me) it essentially means everything in her social media posts should be taken with a grain of salt, because she was likely especially prone i playing up and exaggerating the positives

Nobody just snaps and kills their kids or wife. There is always a history of escalating threats, violence, and abuse. Gavin de Becker's Mosaic website is a great tool to determine if you or someone you know could be in danger:

https://www.mosaicmethod.com/

I agree with this. If she's anything like me and other women I know, she may have felt safe enough to quit her hospital job and then was fighting to get out, so thought she could raise her kids while making a slow plan to get out. My emotionally abusive husband saw every step I took, even when I was being fun-loving and free about it, and did enough to stop almost everything. The closer I got to leaving, the more the fights escalated. I read one of those People stories where it mentions she told him she was going to stay with a friend. It sounded like for a day, and that's where the friend who checked up on her knew there was trouble so quickly. She may have told him she was leaving if he confronted her Monday morning. She had been gone with parents for 3-6 weeks, came back for 2 days, and then was gone on a business trip. He may have waited up for her and had decided to stop it all.

I am also floating a theory I have no basis on, but it's possible the "good friend" knew there was trouble, because she could have been the one he was having an affair with. Probably not, I'm just trying to make sense of it.

Men kill their entire families with some regularity. There's even a name for it. While never expected, it does happen.

Curious what the name of it is?