I'm not #1 in wife's eyes

[Anonymous]

Husbands come and go but your kids are your kids forever. Not only that, but I am actually related to the kids.

It is not uncommon that one has to protect the kids from their mother or their father, so yeah, the kids need to be your first priority no matter which parent you are.

[Anonymous]

Grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Grow up.

+1 it's not a contest. Grow up. Kids require more time and effort while they are young. Maybe if you dig deep and help more she'd have more time for you.

[Anonymous]

And what are you doing to make her a priority to you? What effort have you put into your relationship? Hint...poking her in the back with your boner doesn't count.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We have two kids 10 and 8 and they are #1 in my wife's eyes. I'm a firm #3 and don't really like it.

Are your kids or your spouse your top priority?

Well, wait until you get pushed down even lower by your dog, cat...etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We have two kids 10 and 8 and they are #1 in my wife's eyes. I'm a firm #3 and don't really like it.

Are your kids or your spouse your top priority?

Are you serious? If this is the way you think her shoes will soon be a higher priority.

[Anonymous]

Spouse is always #1. If it was necessary, we could always make more kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1st: my father
2nd: my husband (before kids)
3rd: my kids (switch to 2nd)

I didn't know Ivanka was on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We have two kids 10 and 8 and they are #1 in my wife's eyes. I'm a firm #3 and don't really like it.

[Anonymous]

Your spouse should always be #1. If you put your spouse after your kids, you won't have a spouse, and the kids then suffer.
As long as both parents are treating the kids as their 1.5 and their spouse as their 1. it will be ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Your spouse should always be #1. If you put your spouse after your kids, you won't have a spouse, and the kids then suffer.
As long as both parents are treating the kids as their 1.5 and their spouse as their 1. it will be ok.

+1,000.

The answers from so many on these boards shows why there are so many divorces. People have their priorities backward.

[Anonymous]

So y'all are actually getting all bent out of shape about your spouse telling you that the kids come first...really?

GASP!! - HE/SHE HAS INNATE PATERNAL INSTINCTS HOW DARE THEY!!!

So humor me.
How is your spouse supposed to rectify this gross miscarriage of justice in putting a notch below your own children on the "Who's More Important List"?
If the spouse reneges their remark and says, "I'm sorry honey, you're #1" does that do the trick? Would that put your mind at ease that you're the be-all-end-all to your spouse's existence?
Geezus you people are f__ked in the head for real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Spouse is always #1. If it was necessary, we could always make more kids.

No way. You can never divorce your kids. I had my kids in my mid 30s, way too old to have any more now.

[Anonymous]

I want to be #1
Its not fair!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your spouse should always be #1. If you put your spouse after your kids, you won't have a spouse, and the kids then suffer.
As long as both parents are treating the kids as their 1.5 and their spouse as their 1. it will be ok.

+1,000.

The answers from so many on these boards shows why there are so many divorces. People have their priorities backward.

It's not realistic. Men put their job first. They don't put their spouse 1st and if they did they would not be able to support the family. Sometime a woman has to put the job 1st too.

If a woman came on here and said my H puts his job 1st and spends more time with the kids than me he would get an award.