|
It's none of your fucking business. How's that for an answer ? |
Pretty much this in a nutshell. |
| It is a legitimate question. It's also why we all need to teach our children and to keep talking and raising awareness that all work has value, whether it's paid or not. Your grandma working on the family farm, your mom doing the admin work in what you call your father's business, care for children and elders should all count. |
From the standpoint of how I have influenced my own children though, I don't think that there is that much difference between me and an equally involved SAHM who never worked before she had her kids. |
|
No. Even my affluent ex-H's UMC Jewish grandmother worked outside the home before and after kids. It was a vanity job, but she worked.
I don't really care about the Mommy wars on this issue, though. I know both great and terrible moms in both camps. I wish all families could be in a financial position to do whatever worked best for their kids. Personally, I was best at both parenting and my career when I did contract work and could more or less set my own schedule. I did it again this summer and it was awesome, but I am returning on Monday to a fixed schedule, permanent position for financial reasons. We'll survive, but I'll be a bit less patient and "present" in both roles. |
|
My mother worked, but took some time off with each child. The longest was 2 years. My MIL was a SAHM until her 50s, then had to get a job because of their financial situation.
Both my grandmothers worked prior to getting married and having children. One had a father who went blind when she was in middle school, so the children were called upon to support the family. She still managed to finish high school. The other was an immigrant who worked as a seamstress before meeting my grandfather. |
|
My mother worked during high school and college. She worked before she had children. She stopped working for a few years when she had young children and then resumed work.
My mother's mother worked before marriage. She was not allowed to continue in her job as a librarian once she was married. She never worked after that. My father's mother worked before marriage in a family business. She stopped working when she had children and resumed work when her marriage imploded. My mother in law worked during high school. She stopped working when she had children and resumed work when her marriage imploded. My mother in law's mother worked beginning in childhood. She took a short break from working when her husband was stationed overseas. So far as I know, there is no one in my family line, male or female, who has not worked outside the home, same in my husband's. We don't come from rich people. Often the women who took time off during child rearing years were doing something else to bring in money, such as taking in a neighbor's kids or taking in sewing. |
| Most of the women I know worked at least some and I am on the older end (50s) for DCUM so we are talking an older generation. My mother was a lawyer. MIL worked on an off, more in admin type roles. Both of my grandmothers (one wealthy, one not) worked at least initially when they graduated from college although both then did stay home after that but did volunteer type work. I guess it is notable that both of my grandmothers (who were born around 1910) went to college, although one went to a teachers college that I don't think was 4 years. |
|
MIL, who's in her 80s, started working when she was widowed at age 50. She had some tough years but got through.
Two of her daughters never worked. They're in their early 60s. One is well provided for by her husband who set up various funds, insurances, etc to cover her lifestyle in the event of his death. The other already lives hand to mouth and has no savings. They're typical of their generations. The only thing the extended family worry about, is how the second SIL will be able to support herself if her husband becomes incapacitated. To me the whole debate of SAHM vs WOHM is missing the point. One is not better or superior to the other. The bottom line is really financial responsibility and solvency. If you are solely dependent on your spouse's income and has absolutely no safety net or emergency funds, then staying at home is really the wrong choice for you. |
|
I'm the person whose mom has an advanced degree from a good school but only worked for a few years in an entry-level job.
The thing is, that doesn't stop my mom from thinking she knows what's right about every job or career situation. |
|
My Mom came from a broken home and had nothing. She knew there was no way for her to go to college and so she went to secretary school and then married my Dad at 20. Maybe 19? He also had come from nothing. She had me at 22, worked part time as a secretary until my brother was born 3 years later, and has never returned to paid work. She now sits on two boards, volunteers at her church, and at my kids schools. She was the epitome of a great and aspirational SAHP. My Dad made a ton of money thanks in part to her staying home and they live a great life now at 63, three homes, winter in FL, summer on the eastern shore, and the rest of the year live right near their kids and grandkids. They play golf together all the time and have a great relationship going on 45 years.
My MIL also had no money or resources to go to college. She also married my FIL young. She had 4 kids and opened up her own purse store at some point with a friend, but that was part time. She stopped work altogether when my husband was about 5? She also has been happily married to my FIL for 51 years and they enjoy a lovely retirement together. |
+1 women don't need to worry about misogyny. No one puts another women down quite like a woman who made a different choice. We need a whole lot of grow the f$ck up and mind your own business. Perhaps we need to work more on instilling tolerance and understanding in our own sex instead of bitching about men holding us back. |
This. Hating on the women who fought for the opportunities you have today. Shameful. |
Thank you. The housewife fable from the first half of the 20th century only applies to a certain class -- or to men who were willing to live in poverty because they were opposed to their wives working. |