![]() |
Op,
You are correct, but people who are entitled are not going to admit the are entitled. There was a whole thread on men claiming they can't function at work (aka, the fog) if they go 5 day, 7 days, 10 days without sex. It is pathetic. Many say they will chest if they don't "get it enough" or if they are getting it "the sex lacks passion". Pain and simple it is emotional anise to tell a spouse put out or I will cheat and the cheating will be your fault because you suck in bed or don't give it up enough... Or my favorite, you put the kids first and I feel devalued. Cheaters/entitled to sex posters are going to roast you, call you cold, dumb, too young to understand. But you are correct. It is so much easier to lower a libido than to increase one, but men would never agree, they just blame their wives as if they purposely are denying sex" So many people go without sex for various reasons... Deployed, illness, etc... It's not a basic need. |
Anise = abuse
Sorry for other various misspelled words, |
A few points. First, reasonable efforts to meet one's spouse's sexual needs/desires is implicit in monogamy. Few would agree to an arrangement where they simultaneously agree that one person is to be their sole sexual partner for the rest of their lives AND that that person can unilaterally decide later that the relationship is no longer to be a sexual one. That's not a reasonable interpretation of marriage, absent some sort of explicit agreement. Second, sex has traditionally been understood to be part of marriage; indeed many religious traditions include a spousal obligation to have sex running in favor of BOTH women and men. While not an expert, I believe that to be true in both Jewish and Islamic traditions, for example. Note of this justifies rape or coercion, of course, in the same way that if someone breaches a contract with me, I am not then entitled to assault them or to break into their house to take money or property I can use to be made whole. But it is a far cry from "rape culture" that many men expect marriage to be a sexual relationship, when that has been the traditional, implicit, and often explicit assumption about the nature of marriage. While a man's only legitimate remedy in those cases is to leave the marriage, he is perfectly justified in doing so when the sex disappears. |
![]() |
Conjugal rights, OP. |
Don't married couples do a lot of things just for there spouse why is sex not seen as something similar where you do it just for your spouse. If you loved them wouldn't you want them to be happy and not suffer if you can. |
Op how many times have you forced yourself on a guy? As a man, I have had sex when I do not want to have sex. Women are more representative of your general argument. After all men will have sex with anyone at any time right? As a woman you just pick who you want to have sex with and that's that. The male has no say in the matter(you know rape culture). As a male, I have had my junk fondle in public, pulled into bathrooms/bedrooms while being kissed by women I do not find attractive...and I do not want to have sex with. So you may want to look at your own behavior and how women view men sexually before making these general statements. PS I think you are just a rape culture troll. |
Maybe we should have you spend a summer abroad as a muslim wife in Pakistan |
Maybe for YOU it isnt but orgasms make a body feel good and I need them regularly. -- signed woman who loves sex |
Gyno + psychologist, I'd suggest both. |
+1 |
No one is entitled to sex, but healthy marriages have sex. If DH one day just decided he wasn't ever going to have sex with me for the rest of our marriage, I'd assume the marriage was over and file for divorce. To me, it's the same as DH saying that he wasn't going to live with me in my house any longer. |
You sound fun. |
It is for normally functioning adults. I realize deviancy exists, but an adult to not consider sex to be a basic human need is not normal. |