S/o places you have no desire to go to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good to know dcum is full of ignorant people.

Let them stay here. I'd rather be on safari without them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good to know dcum is full of ignorant people.

Let them stay here. I'd rather be on safari without them.

Lol we can go together then.

[Anonymous]

India. Russia. Middle East.

[Anonymous]

This is hilarious! So much patrician parochialism from a self-proclaimed "worldly" group.

There's a Ritx in Naples for your East coast pleasure. And Dana Point for your West.

I am continuing my global exploration. And I won't have to apologize for you. No wonder Americans are looked down upon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious! So much patrician parochialism from a self-proclaimed "worldly" group.

There's a Ritx in Naples for your East coast pleasure. And Dana Point for your West.

I am continuing my global exploration. And I won't have to apologize for you. No wonder Americans are looked down upon.

I am one of the PPs - and I listed places I have no desire to visit. Trust there are TONS of places I want to visit (and do). I just don't have time for all of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:India. Russia. Middle East.

I came here to post this exact list. Are you my double??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I basically have no desire for the entire middle of the country. I really do consider them flyover states. The idea of not living within a half hour of ocean unsettles me.

You visit the Great Lakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Japan -- the culture is very hostile to women and fish

Hostile to women? Uh, no.

And hostile to fish, too?! Made me laugh.

[Anonymous]

Ha ha nyc. Been there twice, I never need to go back. I don't think the pluses are worth the negatives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I basically have no desire for the entire middle of the country. I really do consider them flyover states. The idea of not living within a half hour of ocean unsettles me.

You visit the Great Lakes.

Just FYI coastal snobs . . . Michigan alone has more coastline than California.

[Anonymous]

north korea

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:north korea

Forgot that one. Definitely a no-go.

[Anonymous]

Not judging, but for the pp who said bolivia, you don't know what you are missing. It's an absolute jem. Incredible, diverse scenery and the people are so warm and wonderful.

On my no-go list is Beijing. I'd love to see rural China, but the cities are so polluted I'm not sure you can actually see anything.

[Anonymous]

No desire to go anywhere in the Middle East, Russia, India, or East Asia. I'd also be fine if I never see Montana, North Dakota, New Mexico, and Nebraska, or if I never return to Iowa, Mississippi and Alabama - there is nothing in any of those states that seem like a good enough reason to go there voluntarily.

Africa used to be on my list of places I had no interest in seeing until a friend went on safari and I heard all of the details about her trip. It sounded and looked so amazing that she changed my mind.

Any cruise to a tropical island or Mexico. Not interested in getting a stomach virus or being stuck on a boat with thousands of people.

[Anonymous]

Haiti, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, St. Martin (not again)
Russia has a ton of great art at the Hermitage in St. Petersburg. And DH says the gems in the imperial treasury in Moscow makes the crown jewels in London look like cheap crap. So I def. want to go there sometime. DH's family is from a small island in Denmark, so a northern European cruise that maybe starts from Copenhagen and includes St. Petersburg is the only traditonal cruise we are interested in.