Setting boundaries with STBX?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - when and how did your affair start?

it started around the time of our separation. New Guy is a family friend and he and I have always felt attraction. he separated from his DW around the same time as my STBX and I did.

Eww. Trashy.

awww do you think you're smart?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does Starbucks (STBX) have to do with this situation ?

Starbucks closed down today at $80 per share.

OP is at fault for committing adultery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Starbucks (STBX) have to do with this situation ?

Starbucks closed down today at $80 per share.

OP is at fault for committing adultery.

I love when idiots latch onto fiction in their head instead of reading. It's my fave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, ignore the poster who keeps insisting marriage is for life and you are a terrible person who should wear a scarlet letter. That person has serious issues.

Good news. Amazon Prime days means you might get that scarlet letter at a substantial discount.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Starbucks (STBX) have to do with this situation ?

Starbucks closed down today at $80 per share.

OP is at fault for committing adultery.

I love when idiots latch onto fiction in their head instead of reading. It's my fave.

The only idiots in this thread are those pretending that the OP is not committing adultery. She separated at the same time that her lover separated from his wife. Only an idiot would believe OP's false claim that the adulterous affair didn't start until after the separation. Regardless,adultery is adultery when one is still married but has sex with another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Starbucks (STBX) have to do with this situation ?

Starbucks closed down today at $80 per share.

OP is at fault for committing adultery.

I love when idiots latch onto fiction in their head instead of reading. It's my fave.

The only idiots in this thread are those pretending that the OP is not committing adultery. She separated at the same time that her lover separated from his wife. Only an idiot would believe OP's false claim that the adulterous affair didn't start until after the separation. Regardless,adultery is adultery when one is still married but has sex with another.

No, only an idiot would bring her own projections into it and keep repeating the same lies despite OP saying something completely opposite several times. I realize that kind of thinking is very popular these days. Look at where we are as a country. So many of you don't care about facts, only feelings. But a lot of us still care about facts. Stupidity is stupidity and you're definitely infected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Starbucks (STBX) have to do with this situation ?

Starbucks closed down today at $80 per share.

OP is at fault for committing adultery.

I love when idiots latch onto fiction in their head instead of reading. It's my fave.

The only idiots in this thread are those pretending that the OP is not committing adultery. She separated at the same time that her lover separated from his wife. Only an idiot would believe OP's false claim that the adulterous affair didn't start until after the separation. Regardless,adultery is adultery when one is still married but has sex with another.

No, only an idiot would bring her own projections into it and keep repeating the same lies despite OP saying something completely opposite several times. I realize that kind of thinking is very popular these days. Look at where we are as a country. So many of you don't care about facts, only feelings. But a lot of us still care about facts. Stupidity is stupidity and you're definitely infected.

Stop rationalizing OP's disgusting behavior. Bet that you have a lot in common with OP--certainly you are on the same disgusting moral level. Oh, and to counter your name-calling, you are a stupid idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does Starbucks (STBX) have to do with this situation ?

Starbucks closed down today at $80 per share.

OP is at fault for committing adultery.

I love when idiots latch onto fiction in their head instead of reading. It's my fave.

The only idiots in this thread are those pretending that the OP is not committing adultery. She separated at the same time that her lover separated from his wife. Only an idiot would believe OP's false claim that the adulterous affair didn't start until after the separation. Regardless,adultery is adultery when one is still married but has sex with another.

No, only an idiot would bring her own projections into it and keep repeating the same lies despite OP saying something completely opposite several times. I realize that kind of thinking is very popular these days. Look at where we are as a country. So many of you don't care about facts, only feelings. But a lot of us still care about facts. Stupidity is stupidity and you're definitely infected.

Stop rationalizing OP's disgusting behavior. Bet that you have a lot in common with OP--certainly you are on the same disgusting moral level. Oh, and to counter your name-calling, you are a stupid idiot.

Again, I deal with facts and rational people. You refuse to read what she actually wrote and want to continue spewing lies. That's your choice, but I will call you out every time.

It also never fails that when your kind is called out for your BS you resort to "I bet you are the same." Since OP did the right thing by ending the marriage and letting her ex know that they could both see other people, I guess you could be right. If I were ever in her situation, I'd do the same. Again, you;re just too dumb to comprehend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are making your divorce harder by dating before it’s final. It’s literally adultery. Aside from any possible legal consequences, you are making it more contentious and you are not just reducing his incentive to cooperate but actively making him angry. All this is foolish in the extreme.

It's literally NOT adultery; their terms were that both parties could see other people.

They were still legally married, so it is literally adultery, dolt.

[Anonymous]

Good thing we have Donald Trump, paragon of virtue, here to usher in a new era of morality and death to adulterers!

[Anonymous]

On a more serious note: I do wonder about the posters who display zero empathy. Let's say someone *did* have an affair! I doubt they feel proud about it. My bet is that most people who have affairs feel terrible about it. But I also think even good people make mistakes and behave badly sometimes. That doesn't make them terrible people. It makes them decent people who did something wrong. And we don't know what the circumstances were that led them there.

To the super-Christians on this and other threads whose attitude is: "This person is an adulterer and therefore just a disgusting bad blameworthy person in every way, i hope they rot!" - whatever happened to Christian charity? To letting he who is blameless cast the first stone?

Or maybe it's just the Taliban joining DCUM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good thing we have Donald Trump, paragon of virtue, here to usher in a new era of morality and death to adulterers!

What are you blathering about? I don’t think trump has anything to do with this person. Where do you see anything about him that she is involved with him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On a more serious note: I do wonder about the posters who display zero empathy. Let's say someone *did* have an affair! I doubt they feel proud about it. My bet is that most people who have affairs feel terrible about it. But I also think even good people make mistakes and behave badly sometimes. That doesn't make them terrible people. It makes them decent people who did something wrong. And we don't know what the circumstances were that led them there.

To the super-Christians on this and other threads whose attitude is: "This person is an adulterer and therefore just a disgusting bad blameworthy person in every way, i hope they rot!" - whatever happened to Christian charity? To letting he who is blameless cast the first stone?

Or maybe it's just the Taliban joining DCUM?

I don’t think she should rot but I certainly don’t believe in what she is doing with impunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a more serious note: I do wonder about the posters who display zero empathy. Let's say someone *did* have an affair! I doubt they feel proud about it. My bet is that most people who have affairs feel terrible about it. But I also think even good people make mistakes and behave badly sometimes. That doesn't make them terrible people. It makes them decent people who did something wrong. And we don't know what the circumstances were that led them there.

To the super-Christians on this and other threads whose attitude is: "This person is an adulterer and therefore just a disgusting bad blameworthy person in every way, i hope they rot!" - whatever happened to Christian charity? To letting he who is blameless cast the first stone?

Or maybe it's just the Taliban joining DCUM?

I don’t think she should rot but I certainly don’t believe in what she is doing with impunity.

Oh cool, what would you consider appropariately punitive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good thing we have Donald Trump, paragon of virtue, here to usher in a new era of morality and death to adulterers!

What are you blathering about? I don’t think trump has anything to do with this person. Where do you see anything about him that she is involved with him?

ha ha PP you are a gem