Men who cheat on their beautiful wives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men are just hardwired to seek novelty and variety. Cultural and personal factors will determine how disciplined they are about impulses.

When I was in the military I had buddies who were basically pro sports level attractive, tall, and charismatic. They had the hottest girlfriends and sometimes even a wife, but they would risk it all by hooking up with an ugly chick or a hood rat because they love the thrill of new conquests.

Good example is Arnold, he married a Kennedy and had kids/house/everything but still banged out his latina maid and had a kid with her.

What is it called when a woman does the same thing though??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men are just hardwired to seek novelty and variety. Cultural and personal factors will determine how disciplined they are about impulses.

When I was in the military I had buddies who were basically pro sports level attractive, tall, and charismatic. They had the hottest girlfriends and sometimes even a wife, but they would risk it all by hooking up with an ugly chick or a hood rat because they love the thrill of new conquests.

Good example is Arnold, he married a Kennedy and had kids/house/everything but still banged out his latina maid and had a kid with her.

What is it called when a woman does the same thing though??

I don't know if there is a female equivalent. Some are nymphos but that's rare and not quite the same.

Women are usually very selective in sex, even on a promiscuous streak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men are just hardwired to seek novelty and variety. Cultural and personal factors will determine how disciplined they are about impulses.

When I was in the military I had buddies who were basically pro sports level attractive, tall, and charismatic. They had the hottest girlfriends and sometimes even a wife, but they would risk it all by hooking up with an ugly chick or a hood rat because they love the thrill of new conquests.

Good example is Arnold, he married a Kennedy and had kids/house/everything but still banged out his latina maid and had a kid with her.

What is it called when a woman does the same thing though??

I don't know if there is a female equivalent. Some are nymphos but that's rare and not quite the same.

Women are usually very selective in sex, even on a promiscuous streak.

Here in DCUM land, the equivalent of a man cheating on his beautiful wife is a woman cheating on her rich husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Variety. Every jay jay gets old after a while, no matter how much you attempt to "spice it up".

+1. It’s all about diverse jay jay.

+1. If I men don’t receive a nice assortment of varied va jay jay, they get depressed and unfulfilled. I think it’s biologic.

Then why get married

Monogamy is a recent invention and, on the whole, probably socially beneficial to keep things together societally. Plus there is a balance to be struck between guaranteed jay jay versus varied jay jay.

Think of it like a power grid trying to integrate renewables. You have as the baseload power like gas, which ensures that the lights stay on and is there when other sources of power fail. Then you have your wind, solar and other renewables that are intermittent and nice to have, but sometimes it's not windy or the sun is not shining and there is not sufficient battery storage to ensure stability of supply. Marriage ensures that the lights stay on, but wouldn't it be nice to have a more sustainable, eco-friendly grid without loss of functionality.

In sum, all men want is more, varied power and to heal the world from environmental degradation. Perhaps a bit morally dubious at the individual level, but the philandering comes a place of love for the earth and all of humanity (literally, I guess, if the man really gets after it).

[Anonymous]

He learned that some things are more important than looks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here ya go

https://www.survivinginfidelity.com/topics/558762/honey-they-always-affair-down/

Women are women's worst enemies. What a horribly petty mean girl way to make the other woman responsible for your philandering excuse for a man while insulting her in the process. Absolutely pathetic.

You call the betrayed spouse a "petty mean girl", but not the woman who willingly slept with a married man? A woman who does that is exactly as described, and women who turn down married men are also exactly as described.

There is no excuse for a married man (or person) to go outside their marriage, but it takes two to cheat, and that does not absolve the other party from their portion.

Okay, but you have to let your anger toward the other woman go. She is not your problem; you have a husband problem.

I have neither, just an interested poster who clicked and read the link. Anger can be helpful, but I agree it should be towards the wayward spouse, not the AP. Reframing the anger as per the link could be helpful to some.

DP, calling him “wayward” is pathetic and not putting nearly enough blame on his active choice to break his marriage vows.

Wayward/betrayed are the terms used on that website, and commonly used for infidelity.

[Anonymous]

"When I was in the military I had buddies who were basically pro sports level attractive, tall, and charismatic. They had the hottest girlfriends and sometimes even a wife, but they would risk it all by hooking up with an ugly chick or a hood rat because they love the thrill of new conquests."

This. It's risk-taking behavior and the uggos are the easy conquests. For a guy like you describe, uggos are salivating to bang out of their league.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what A. Schwarzenegger was thinking.

Classic vanity play. I know lots of lifter guys who often dated ugly women because those women would be more "into" them. The guy didn't need a hot woman, he needed a woman to worship him. For some guys, that's the reason. Women often stop trying as the relationship ages, so the man looks elsewhere.

For others, they like the chase and the conquest. For others still, they're just dogs.

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here ya go

https://www.survivinginfidelity.com/topics/558762/honey-they-always-affair-down/

Women are women's worst enemies. What a horribly petty mean girl way to make the other woman responsible for your philandering excuse for a man while insulting her in the process. Absolutely pathetic.

You call the betrayed spouse a "petty mean girl", but not the woman who willingly slept with a married man? A woman who does that is exactly as described, and women who turn down married men are also exactly as described.

There is no excuse for a married man (or person) to go outside their marriage, but it takes two to cheat, and that does not absolve the other party from their portion.

Okay, but you have to let your anger toward the other woman go. She is not your problem; you have a husband problem.

I have neither, just an interested poster who clicked and read the link. Anger can be helpful, but I agree it should be towards the wayward spouse, not the AP. Reframing the anger as per the link could be helpful to some.

DP, calling him “wayward” is pathetic and not putting nearly enough blame on his active choice to break his marriage vows.

Wayward/betrayed are the terms used on that website, and commonly used for infidelity.

Yes, I gathered but it diminishes the husband’s active role.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Variety. Every jay jay gets old after a while, no matter how much you attempt to "spice it up".

+1. It’s all about diverse jay jay.

+1. If I men don’t receive a nice assortment of varied va jay jay, they get depressed and unfulfilled. I think it’s biologic.

Then why get married

Monogamy is a recent invention and, on the whole, probably socially beneficial to keep things together societally. Plus there is a balance to be struck between guaranteed jay jay versus varied jay jay.

Think of it like a power grid trying to integrate renewables. You have as the baseload power like gas, which ensures that the lights stay on and is there when other sources of power fail. Then you have your wind, solar and other renewables that are intermittent and nice to have, but sometimes it's not windy or the sun is not shining and there is not sufficient battery storage to ensure stability of supply. Marriage ensures that the lights stay on, but wouldn't it be nice to have a more sustainable, eco-friendly grid without loss of functionality.

In sum, all men want is more, varied power and to heal the world from environmental degradation. Perhaps a bit morally dubious at the individual level, but the philandering comes a place of love for the earth and all of humanity (literally, I guess, if the man really gets after it).

NP but this analogy only make sense if we are looking from the perspective of the cheating man.
While devastating your partner who you vowed to never betray, you come from "a place of love for the earth and all of humanity"?


Why not just choose open relationships, if you're not cut out for monogamy?

[Anonymous]

Grohl cheated on his hot wife with this fat pig and fathered a child with tatoo'd low rate pornstar pig

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men are just hardwired to seek novelty and variety. Cultural and personal factors will determine how disciplined they are about impulses.

When I was in the military I had buddies who were basically pro sports level attractive, tall, and charismatic. They had the hottest girlfriends and sometimes even a wife, but they would risk it all by hooking up with an ugly chick or a hood rat because they love the thrill of new conquests.

Good example is Arnold, he married a Kennedy and had kids/house/everything but still banged out his latina maid and had a kid with her.

What is it called when a woman does the same thing though??

gay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what A. Schwarzenegger was thinking.

I thought of him too. Availability? That's got to be part of it.

I think Ethan Hawke cheated on Una Thurman with the nanny and married her.

My guess would be that the wives were not into them anymore and these women gave them a lot of attention. Thar they were in their home and they didn't have to go very far or be seen in public made it easier.

[Anonymous]

Some men will have sex with anyone and I think for a lot of men, they never were really committed to staying faithful. They may have said so and may get married, but they never meant it and if they have the opportunity, they will cheat. The person can look like anything if she's available.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men are just hardwired to seek novelty and variety. Cultural and personal factors will determine how disciplined they are about impulses.

When I was in the military I had buddies who were basically pro sports level attractive, tall, and charismatic. They had the hottest girlfriends and sometimes even a wife, but they would risk it all by hooking up with an ugly chick or a hood rat because they love the thrill of new conquests.

Good example is Arnold, he married a Kennedy and had kids/house/everything but still banged out his latina maid and had a kid with her.

What is it called when a woman does the same thing though??

I don't know if there is a female equivalent. Some are nymphos but that's rare and not quite the same.

Women are usually very selective in sex, even on a promiscuous streak.

Here in DCUM land, the equivalent of a man cheating on his beautiful wife is a woman cheating on her rich husband.

Ahh ok good equivalent.

So really it’s the same thing. The person feels they miss out on something. For men it’s being treated God like and women emotional connection. Simple.