Vance on tape bashing childless teachers, says they "brainwash & destroy the minds of children". What is wrong with him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean teachers were never going to vote for Trump anyway, but the thing with teachers, even those without kids and many many people who love them and they have touched many lives. So hopefully this weighs a few hearts and minds over to Harris

In our school district, unfortunately many of the MAGAs hate teachers/schools. Very loudly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is a fringe nutcase. How is he on a major party's ticket when he is not only nuts he has very limited political experience?

Just 2 yrs of experience in the Senate and he keeps sharing fringe reactionary views.

And the cherry on top is his complete lack of charm.

This is Palin 2.0. Although I think she was more thoroughly vetted.

It's completely mystifying to me that Trump has literally had YEARS to vet and select a VP candidate and they missed so much when vetting Vance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VP candidates are supposed to "do no harm".

What a mess Trump's pick has been. Trump is so crazy he needed someone stable and mainstream to balance him out. Everyone said no except Vance, so he got stuck with the VP candidate Trump deserved: charmless, Aunt Lydia type conservative whack job who can't connect to any Americans.

So he's basically Mike Pence without the charm. Well done, MAGA.

And zero experience! Which, love him or hate him, Pence had a lot of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VP candidates are supposed to "do no harm".

What a mess Trump's pick has been. Trump is so crazy he needed someone stable and mainstream to balance him out. Everyone said no except Vance, so he got stuck with the VP candidate Trump deserved: charmless, Aunt Lydia type conservative whack job who can't connect to any Americans.

So he's basically Mike Pence without the charm. Well done, MAGA.

And zero experience! Which, love him or hate him, Pence had a lot of.

They definitely hate him. They wanted to find him and hang him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump should have picked a woman with appeal, like Haley or is it Nancy Mace? He would have doubled his odds right then and there, because she would appeal to Independents, many people would compare her favorably to Kamala, and people would feel comfortable with her stepping in to the presidential role if needed. kamala picked well (her VP compares favorably to Trump), Trump picked poorly. What a misfire.

His Klan is already attacking the wife of his VP choice for her race and she has no actual power, you seriously think his racist trash flying monkeys are going to want Nimrata that close to the presidency? Besides, the way she talked during her campaign, she seemed to be running to replace Netanyahu, not actually rep America

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is a fringe nutcase. How is he on a major party's ticket when he is not only nuts he has very limited political experience?

Just 2 yrs of experience in the Senate and he keeps sharing fringe reactionary views.

And the cherry on top is his complete lack of charm.

This is Palin 2.0. Although I think she was more thoroughly vetted.

It's completely mystifying to me that Trump has literally had YEARS to vet and select a VP candidate and they missed so much when vetting Vance.

What makes you think they didn't know about these things of Vance when they picked him?

IMO, MAGA agree with him, and those who don't just stick their fingers in their ears as they yell, "build the wall".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VP candidates are supposed to "do no harm".

What a mess Trump's pick has been. Trump is so crazy he needed someone stable and mainstream to balance him out. Everyone said no except Vance, so he got stuck with the VP candidate Trump deserved: charmless, Aunt Lydia type conservative whack job who can't connect to any Americans.

So he's basically Mike Pence without the charm. Well done, MAGA.

And zero experience! Which, love him or hate him, Pence had a lot of.

They definitely hate him. They wanted to find him and hang him.

Yep. No way an experienced politician would take that job now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VP candidates are supposed to "do no harm".

What a mess Trump's pick has been. Trump is so crazy he needed someone stable and mainstream to balance him out. Everyone said no except Vance, so he got stuck with the VP candidate Trump deserved: charmless, Aunt Lydia type conservative whack job who can't connect to any Americans.

So he's basically Mike Pence without the charm. Well done, MAGA.

And zero experience! Which, love him or hate him, Pence had a lot of.

And Pence served a clear purpose - a known quantity getting the evangelical vote and normalizing Trump to mainstream Rs. He did that successfully in 2016.

[Anonymous]

So guess he’s against any nuns teaching kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is a fringe nutcase. How is he on a major party's ticket when he is not only nuts he has very limited political experience?

Just 2 yrs of experience in the Senate and he keeps sharing fringe reactionary views.

And the cherry on top is his complete lack of charm.

This is Palin 2.0. Although I think she was more thoroughly vetted.

It's completely mystifying to me that Trump has literally had YEARS to vet and select a VP candidate and they missed so much when vetting Vance.

They thought they were going to coast into the White House and that picking a middle finger to good people would help run up the score.

[Anonymous]

Every GOP accusation is a confession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is a fringe nutcase. How is he on a major party's ticket when he is not only nuts he has very limited political experience?

Just 2 yrs of experience in the Senate and he keeps sharing fringe reactionary views.

And the cherry on top is his complete lack of charm.

[/b]This is Palin 2.0. Although I think she was more thoroughly vetted.[b]

It's completely mystifying to me that Trump has literally had YEARS to vet and select a VP candidate and they missed so much when vetting Vance.

If Palin is the best they could do after vetting, considering her Jerry Springer family and the fact it took her five mediocre colleges and six years to get a communications degree, that doesn’t say much for GOP vetting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VP candidates are supposed to "do no harm".

What a mess Trump's pick has been. Trump is so crazy he needed someone stable and mainstream to balance him out. Everyone said no except Vance, so he got stuck with the VP candidate Trump deserved: charmless, Aunt Lydia type conservative whack job who can't connect to any Americans.

So he's basically Mike Pence without the charm. Well done, MAGA.

And zero experience! Which, love him or hate him, Pence had a lot of.

A lot of forcing IN into the toilet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So guess he’s against any nuns teaching kids?

So much for school vouchers for Catholic schools. What are those deviants without children doing teaching our kids. No.

[Anonymous]

Plenty people feel like him and no they aren't all conservative incels.

I've even seen posters on this very site claim that they aren't going to follow the pediatricians or teachers advice because they don't have kids, call childless adults who work with kids secret pedos.
Is Vance a bonehead?. Yep, but spare is the faux outrage