
I feel like most kids are leaving it blank. How will colleges ever actually know who has matriculated? I feel like they won't unless someone literally goes through freshman ID photos and assigns race to pictures (just half joking). |
Their perspective must have been primed for racism. If you run into someone who is non collaborative, most people blame the person. This PP blamed an entire RACE. And assumed others of the race are the same! It’s shocking. Maybe this gives that poster food for thought about how they interpret the actions and personalities of others. |
Maybe after they are admitted, they’re asked to provide demographic data |
I’m Asian American. These traits are pretty run of the mill in terms of the cultures many of us are raised under. Being competitive comes with a culture that cares about education. I think there’s a lack of context, because we don’t know how many men/asian men are in this science department, but I’ve seen similar things. Replace Asian with men, and this is a perfectly acceptable rant on how men bulldoze women in academia- it’s time to stop treating race so special that we can’t have open conversations on it. |
You don’t think demographics can have a play in academia at all? Is this a serious response or just a troll trying to out woke me |
Essays mentioned it. Member of certain affinity groups in high school and an active member. Independent research project that touched on the topic as well. |
More proof that Asians are the most persecuted race, while black and Hispanic students get admissions boosts for being inadequate, we get punished and are deemed “competitive” for being good students |
Yes the big secret is that many SLACs want Asian kids (full pay too). |
Every selective college wants a racially diverse class - as they should. But every college is going to have its own tipping point. The colleges that really prioritize talent - MIT, CalTech, Georgia Tech, Berkeley, Rice, UCLA, Stanford, Duke - are going to have more Asian students compared to the national average. And some schools are not, because they prioritize racial diversity over talent. You can look at the breakdown for each college. It's pretty interesting. But I think generally, colleges are looking at the racial demographics of 18 year olds in America today and figure that if the accepted students more or less match those numbers, they're good and out of the spotlight. That thinking works well for Black and Hispanic students; less well for white and Asian students. But it's going to be school dependent. |
This is true for our private. But biracial half Asian students did much better than full Asian students with better stats. Though I think there is some correlation between majors. Asians, who are traditional, stem applicants tend to do the worst. And white students did the very best. |
People are finally realizing that you can get a STEM degree from an SLAC, which has boosted application numbers. Almost every top lac has a very nice new Science center, heavy investment into summer research programs bent towards STEM, and a growing majority of their classes being STEM majors. It’s a puzzling transformation |
I don’t know about undergrad, but it sure seems like med schools are still using affirmative action. |
According to the Common App report for last year's admission cycle the majority reported race (no difference statistically); however, there was a small uptick in other/no-answer. |
Med schools are a whole different world. I will say that having a black doctor can be life or death for black mothers. We also need rural doctors so AA for rural students, especially at UC Davis, is important. Medicine is a bit different, because it’s professional school that serves the public in important ways. Many of these top schools are finishing schools for consulting firms |
It’s disgusting that anyone cares if the Ivy League is 100% Asian- bring in the best candidates! Diversity = Mediocrity and should not be considered for admission to a top college. Anyone who says otherwise is a racist. |