Will Trump drop Vance?

[Anonymous]

He should have chosen Little Marco

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump campaign support is imploding... Elon Musk has backed out of his pledge to give Trump campaign $45 million a month

https://fortune.com/2024/07/23/elon-musk-backs-down-from-45-million-a-month-pledge-to-trump-says-he-doesnt-subscribe-to-cult-of-personality/

This is incorrect. At least be honest. Musk is still giving $45 million to a super PAC to elect a Republican. It doesn't have Trump's name specifically on it.

+1 democrats are allergic to simple truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

There is exactly one article stating that “Vance was a mistake.” One, not a bunch.

The single article is behind a paywall and written by a journalist who wrote a book attacking Trump. The author does not identify his sources.

If there were “a bunch” of articles, if several credible journalists were reporting this information, maybe it would seem more credible? Maybe?

One source->liberal source->Trump hater author->anon source->op lied about “a bunch of articles.”

Cuckoo.

Exactly. Lib radicals will always attack anything Trump says or does. They fear his mounting successes. Fun to just watch them explode among themselves. Where’s the popcorn?

“Mounting successes”

The full clip.

[Anonymous]

I think Trump used the Ohio strategy for both VP choices . No modern Republican president has ever won election without Ohio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Definitely. That guy has landed like a ton of bricks. Business community HATES him.

And it's the only way he can do anything to break some of Harris' momentum.

The bad news is it will be very hard to do, he'll have to choose someone softer (which will enrage his base) and it still won't make a dent in K's momentum.

Peter Thiel is a major Vance backer. Thiel or his funds have a finger in every major Silicon Valley company and many outside of it. Thiel is (reprehensible and) hugely influential.


So no, the business community does not hate Vance.


Meanwhile, it’s unlikely that either nominee on the ticket can be changed at this stage. Even if he drops out or dies, his name is on the ticket. They’re locked in. If you think he is disliked, that should be good news.


As for Harris momentum, we have yet to see; just too early to tell. She had an early spike of interest and enthusiasm but so would almost any Biden replacement. “Momentum” is probably overstating the case at only two days into her candidacy.

Business is not Tech.

[Anonymous]

I suspect big business and defense industries especially are the ones railing against JD in the media and they want to pressure Trump to select a neocon instead. Hopefully he doesn’t

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump used the Ohio strategy for both VP choices . No modern Republican president has ever won election without Ohio

There’s no way he isn’t winning Ohio. He didn’t need a VP from there who ran twenty points behind all the other Republicans who won in Ohio.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump campaign support is imploding... Elon Musk has backed out of his pledge to give Trump campaign $45 million a month

https://fortune.com/2024/07/23/elon-musk-backs-down-from-45-million-a-month-pledge-to-trump-says-he-doesnt-subscribe-to-cult-of-personality/

This is incorrect. At least be honest. Musk is still giving $45 million to a super PAC to elect a Republican. It doesn't have Trump's name specifically on it.

Either way none of it is a good look, not that they care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

Citations?

“Trump campaign officials acknowledged that Trump selected the inexperienced Vance, charged with all his techno-authoritarian ideas, to boost support among their own base, not extend a hand to swing voters, according to The Atlantic. Vance was a symbol of the Trump team’s assuredness that they would win in 2024. Come Sunday, that assuredness appears to be shrinking.”
https://newrepublic.com/post/184106/trump-picking-jd-vance-mistake-biden-kamala-harris

And this is the Atlantic article referenced
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/trump-campaign-biden-dropping-out/679183/

new republic is not a credible source. The Atlantic link has a paywall.

Besides, nothing in the new republic article mentions anything you are claiming. You are spreading disinformation.

“Most striking thing I heard from Trump allies yesterday was the second-guessing of JD Vance—a selection, they acknowledged, that was [born] of cockiness, meant to run up margins with the base in a blowout rather than persuade swing voters in a nail-biter,” Atlantic staff writer Tim Alberta, who had written the piece about the panicking Trump campaign, posted on X (formerly Twitter).

Who? Names? Who are the Trump “allies” being used as sources? First the author claims he heard from the trump campaign, then Trump allies. But all sources are completely anonymous.

There may be more information behind the paywall, but new republic has nothing so meh, neither does The Atlantic. Nice try.

Tim Alberta is a respected political journalist. I know you’re panicking but don’t blame the messenger.

Who are his sources?

He’s published extensive interviews with Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita recently.

Trump campaign adviser Chris LaCivita said Trump's running mate J.D. Vance is “going to be everywhere” ahead of the election.

Speaking at an event hosted by Brunswick and Georgetown University, LaCivita said the populist Ohioan is “a person we can plug in really anywhere” and will "attract a wider coalition of voters to Trump than we had before.” He cited Vance’s appeal to young and working-class voters.

“We're actually redefining I think the Republican Party in a lot of different ways,” he said, noting Trump’s appeal to the working class.

“That's clearly an issue that bothers the left but it's one we feel passionate about. And quite frankly it's a place where we should have been for a long time.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/16/rnc-live-updates-coverage/get-ready-for-vance-00168709

Oh, this was a serious vetting fail! I'm so happy to see these people get over their skis and now fall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

There is exactly one article stating that “Vance was a mistake.” One, not a bunch.

The single article is behind a paywall and written by a journalist who wrote a book attacking Trump. The author does not identify his sources.

If there were “a bunch” of articles, if several credible journalists were reporting this information, maybe it would seem more credible? Maybe?

One source->liberal source->Trump hater author->anon source->op lied about “a bunch of articles.”

Cuckoo.

Wall Street does not like Vance - a certain flavor of tech does. Vance is pro crypto and pro tariffs and Wall Street abhors tariffs because they are very bad for business. This is not a secret, it’s openly talked about

https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/wall-street-takes-a-back-seat-with-trumps-elevation-of-vance-6183ae08

Ok, but op has claimed a “bunch of sources, even conservative sources” and has presented a single anonymous source.

Furthermore, op has claimed a virtual invisible assassin of a political consultant who is notoriously and infamously ruthless as well as completely competent and silent as a stone is blabbing about Vance.

op is a liar. I personally don’t care for Vance and I also know who else does not like him. DC would rather be engulfed by a plague of immortal locusts and have the streets replaced by rivers of lava than Vance ascend.

Any talk of Trump dropping Vance is wishful thinking, good damn luck.

I do not want Trump dropping Vance. He brings nothing to the ticket in terms of voters who matter. Stick with Vance! He’s your guy!

I am not Donald John Trump. Vance isn’t my VP candidate. I just can’t stand people who don’t adequately cite their sources or misrepresent information. Op cited a single anon source and then threw two people out there as sources who aren’t.

And then has the mouth breathing audacity to ask if I know how things work? Yes, I do, and you are a

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect big business and defense industries especially are the ones railing against JD in the media and they want to pressure Trump to select a neocon instead. Hopefully he doesn’t

+1

^ yes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

Citations?

“Trump campaign officials acknowledged that Trump selected the inexperienced Vance, charged with all his techno-authoritarian ideas, to boost support among their own base, not extend a hand to swing voters, according to The Atlantic. Vance was a symbol of the Trump team’s assuredness that they would win in 2024. Come Sunday, that assuredness appears to be shrinking.”
https://newrepublic.com/post/184106/trump-picking-jd-vance-mistake-biden-kamala-harris

And this is the Atlantic article referenced
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/trump-campaign-biden-dropping-out/679183/

new republic is not a credible source. The Atlantic link has a paywall.

Besides, nothing in the new republic article mentions anything you are claiming. You are spreading disinformation.

“Most striking thing I heard from Trump allies yesterday was the second-guessing of JD Vance—a selection, they acknowledged, that was [born] of cockiness, meant to run up margins with the base in a blowout rather than persuade swing voters in a nail-biter,” Atlantic staff writer Tim Alberta, who had written the piece about the panicking Trump campaign, posted on X (formerly Twitter).

Who? Names? Who are the Trump “allies” being used as sources? First the author claims he heard from the trump campaign, then Trump allies. But all sources are completely anonymous.

There may be more information behind the paywall, but new republic has nothing so meh, neither does The Atlantic. Nice try.

Tim Alberta is a respected political journalist. I know you’re panicking but don’t blame the messenger.

Who are his sources?

He’s published extensive interviews with Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita recently.

Trump campaign adviser Chris LaCivita said Trump's running mate J.D. Vance is “going to be everywhere” ahead of the election.

Speaking at an event hosted by Brunswick and Georgetown University, LaCivita said the populist Ohioan is “a person we can plug in really anywhere” and will "attract a wider coalition of voters to Trump than we had before.” He cited Vance’s appeal to young and working-class voters.

“We're actually redefining I think the Republican Party in a lot of different ways,” he said, noting Trump’s appeal to the working class.

“That's clearly an issue that bothers the left but it's one we feel passionate about. And quite frankly it's a place where we should have been for a long time.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/16/rnc-live-updates-coverage/get-ready-for-vance-00168709

"Plug in anywhere." Yuck. Like a puppet, which he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump campaign support is imploding... Elon Musk has backed out of his pledge to give Trump campaign $45 million a month

https://fortune.com/2024/07/23/elon-musk-backs-down-from-45-million-a-month-pledge-to-trump-says-he-doesnt-subscribe-to-cult-of-personality/

This is incorrect. At least be honest. Musk is still giving $45 million to a super PAC to elect a Republican. It doesn't have Trump's name specifically on it.

Either way none of it is a good look, not that they care.

👁️👅👁️ read more closely next time, that way multiple posters won’t need to correct you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

Citations?

“Trump campaign officials acknowledged that Trump selected the inexperienced Vance, charged with all his techno-authoritarian ideas, to boost support among their own base, not extend a hand to swing voters, according to The Atlantic. Vance was a symbol of the Trump team’s assuredness that they would win in 2024. Come Sunday, that assuredness appears to be shrinking.”
https://newrepublic.com/post/184106/trump-picking-jd-vance-mistake-biden-kamala-harris

And this is the Atlantic article referenced
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/trump-campaign-biden-dropping-out/679183/

new republic is not a credible source. The Atlantic link has a paywall.

Besides, nothing in the new republic article mentions anything you are claiming. You are spreading disinformation.

“Most striking thing I heard from Trump allies yesterday was the second-guessing of JD Vance—a selection, they acknowledged, that was [born] of cockiness, meant to run up margins with the base in a blowout rather than persuade swing voters in a nail-biter,” Atlantic staff writer Tim Alberta, who had written the piece about the panicking Trump campaign, posted on X (formerly Twitter).

Who? Names? Who are the Trump “allies” being used as sources? First the author claims he heard from the trump campaign, then Trump allies. But all sources are completely anonymous.

There may be more information behind the paywall, but new republic has nothing so meh, neither does The Atlantic. Nice try.

Tim Alberta is a respected political journalist. I know you’re panicking but don’t blame the messenger.

Who are his sources?

He’s published extensive interviews with Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita recently.

Trump campaign adviser Chris LaCivita said Trump's running mate J.D. Vance is “going to be everywhere” ahead of the election.

Speaking at an event hosted by Brunswick and Georgetown University, LaCivita said the populist Ohioan is “a person we can plug in really anywhere” and will "attract a wider coalition of voters to Trump than we had before.” He cited Vance’s appeal to young and working-class voters.

“We're actually redefining I think the Republican Party in a lot of different ways,” he said, noting Trump’s appeal to the working class.

“That's clearly an issue that bothers the left but it's one we feel passionate about. And quite frankly it's a place where we should have been for a long time.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/16/rnc-live-updates-coverage/get-ready-for-vance-00168709

"Plug in anywhere." Yuck. Like a puppet, which he is.

The party of Biden (who actually has to be physically guided by his wife, secret service agents, the Italian PM, etc) rages against puppets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He should have chosen Little Marco

Or Lying Ted.