Internalized misogyny

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think of things like:

-women who says they are guys girls, or that the prefer being friends with guys, or that they prefer having male bosses
- women who in the office turn their attention to any man in the room over other women
- women who see women as competition

This absolutely. Women who say they don’t like hanging with other women because “women are all drama,” or “women are just crazy.” They are such “pick me” women and it’s sad.

Also, women who expect other women to deal with sexist BS because “that’s what I dealt with.” I think this can be common in-law relationships.

[Anonymous]

Purity culture and/or the idea that sex has anything to do with one's 'value'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saw the mention of internalized misogyny in another thread. It was referring a MIL’s assumption that DIL does all emotional labor in marriage. I’m interested in this idea - if you have any, could you share other examples of internalized misogyny?

Do you mean the assumption that DIL should do it? Or just that she assumes she does? Because just the assumption isn’t internalized misogyny.

One example of internalized misogyny in my life is my mom believing that women getting fat after 10+ years of marriage is grounds for divorce because “that’s not what the man signed up for.”

Actually a better example is just that she believed that she was better than other women because she was thin and that she valued male validation so much. It’s wild.

OP here. To be honest I don’t really understand that distinction between assuming DIL does it or assuming that she should. They seem like slightly varied situations with the same root issue - the assumption that somehow dil is either responsible or should be.

I understand in my own way that makes validation/aspiring to be thin thing. It is such an imprisoned way to live and so sad that so many of us unconsciously agree to become conditioned to value such a specific thing that is actually meaningless (myself included! I’m in therapy for it).

The difference is that assuming she does it would mean assuming she is like the majority of women in hetero relationships. There are studies that show that women do the majority or all of emotional labor. That doesn’t mean the MIL thinks it’s okay. Maybe somebody who assumed a particular woman does all the emotional labor hates the idea and thinks that she should get a divorce, you know?

[Anonymous]

Saying things like it's okay to be abusive because pms or pregnancy or being disappointed by something.
That's not supporting women it's actually reinforcing negative stereotypes that have been used to justify keeping women out of leadership roles" they're too emotional"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I understand the point you’re making but the facts don’t support them. The *fact* is that women are most likely to be killed by their partners, which is not true for men. The FBI says 70% of intimate-partner deaths are women.

Also…I think it may be incorrect to say men are “cancelled” at a “whisper” of an allegation because, again, there’s Johnny Depp in a major motion picture, making millions. That’s a kind of cancelled a lot of people aspire to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think of things like:

-women who says they are guys girls, or that the prefer being friends with guys, or that they prefer having male bosses
- women who in the office turn their attention to any man in the room over other women
- women who see women as competition

Only the third example has even a whiff of internalized mysogyny. The fact that you think that women who are friends with men is the problem means that you do probably have internalized mysogyny yourself. You hate women and clearly compete with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I feel zero sympathy for Depp. He knew he was working for Disney, who will do anything to protect their family friendly branding. He knew that he would get fired for any misconduct. If he wanted to protect his career, he should have cut ties with Heard early on (or ideally not get involved at all, because he left the mother of his children for Heard who was 25. Bad move, very bad look).

I just can’t feel bad for these men who get fame, leave their wife and kids for a woman young enough to be their daughter because they “deserve” it, drink and do drugs, and then get upset when it affects their career. You really thought people would cheer you on for being a douche? You really thought things would work out with a 23 year old? SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I feel zero sympathy for Depp. He knew he was working for Disney, who will do anything to protect their family friendly branding. He knew that he would get fired for any misconduct. If he wanted to protect his career, he should have cut ties with Heard early on (or ideally not get involved at all, because he left the mother of his children for Heard who was 25. Bad move, very bad look).

I just can’t feel bad for these men who get fame, leave their wife and kids for a woman young enough to be their daughter because they “deserve” it, drink and do drugs, and then get upset when it affects their career. You really thought people would cheer you on for being a douche? You really thought things would work out with a 23 year old? SMH.

But I’m sure you would feel bad if Depp was a women. I’m sure you feel bad for Heard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I understand the point you’re making but the facts don’t support them. The *fact* is that women are most likely to be killed by their partners, which is not true for men. The FBI says 70% of intimate-partner deaths are women.

Also…I think it may be incorrect to say men are “cancelled” at a “whisper” of an allegation because, again, there’s Johnny Depp in a major motion picture, making millions. That’s a kind of cancelled a lot of people aspire to.

We are not talking about that. We are talking about this specific case where the woman is the abuser but has suffered no consequences for her actions because she is a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I understand the point you’re making but the facts don’t support them. The *fact* is that women are most likely to be killed by their partners, which is not true for men. The FBI says 70% of intimate-partner deaths are women.

Also…I think it may be incorrect to say men are “cancelled” at a “whisper” of an allegation because, again, there’s Johnny Depp in a major motion picture, making millions. That’s a kind of cancelled a lot of people aspire to.

You trying to justify heards behavior and Depps abuse at her hands by talking a bout statistics shows just how much you hate men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think of things like:

-women who says they are guys girls, or that the prefer being friends with guys, or that they prefer having male bosses
- women who in the office turn their attention to any man in the room over other women
- women who see women as competition

Only the third example has even a whiff of internalized mysogyny. The fact that you think that women who are friends with men is the problem means that you do probably have internalized mysogyny yourself. You hate women and clearly compete with them.

Work in your reading comprehension. I didn’t say women who are friends with men, I say women who say they prefer being friends with men, who describe themselves as guys girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I understand the point you’re making but the facts don’t support them. The *fact* is that women are most likely to be killed by their partners, which is not true for men. The FBI says 70% of intimate-partner deaths are women.

Also…I think it may be incorrect to say men are “cancelled” at a “whisper” of an allegation because, again, there’s Johnny Depp in a major motion picture, making millions. That’s a kind of cancelled a lot of people aspire to.

We are not talking about that. We are talking about this specific case where the woman is the abuser but has suffered no consequences for her actions because she is a woman.

From the above references to women teachers, and men getting “20 years” it doesn’t seem like you’re referring to this specific case? Because Amber Heard is certainly no teacher and Johnny Depp is not going to spend a minute in jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the depp/heard trial right now is a good illustration - while it can be hard to sort through competing allegations and some people do have personality disorders where they are gifted liars - but fundamentally he filed the defamation to PUNISH her and there is this circus where she is ridiculed for essentially not being perfect enough

Wait, you've been following the Depp trial and your takeaway has been that Amber Heard is the victim here???

Depp has had restraining orders taken out on him in England for domestic violence years ago.
Depp also pulled the same shit of suing an English papers for defamation over the paper printing about his abuse of her. The English judge ruled in favor if the paper and said what they printed was true.

Now Depp tries same thing in the US. Gifted manipulative actor Depp is 100% trying to punish her for speaking up and divorcing him, and he seems to like the attention and perhaps hoping to get more press…..

It seems there’s a red-pill Trumper in here spewing toxic crap in this thread just for his own sad amusement.

Amber Heard abused her ex girlfriend. Have you even watched the trial? There were tapes of her fighting with him admitting that she had physically assaulted him on more than one occasion. She had severed his finger. She is an abuser. I’m not saying he isn’t, but she is not an innocent party, and she doesn’t deserve to have a career when Johnny Depps career was taken away from him. I don’t even like him as an actor, but she is a manipulative abuser. You’re clearly bias and won’t admit she is an abuser because you hate men. She is a toxic manipulative abuser.

I’m a DP but the bolded has always frustrated me— no it wasn’t. He was in a major film (that Harry Potter one) during these allegations. And if he hadn’t been “taken away from him” would still be inaccurate because not hiring someone who is a known abuser is not taking something away from them— no one is entitled to be a movie star.

The issue is he was fired from the Pirates of the Caribbean stuff but Amber Heard is still in a move that many people have talked about wanting her to be fired. Her scenes were cut but she is in it. Women who are accused don’t get the same punishment as men, in celeb life or real life. We have a huge issue with women ( specifically teachers) harm young guys and getting away with it with just probation or 1-2 years while a man would get 20 years for the exact crime. We are soft on crime when it comes to women in this country more than we are men. We look the other way for abusive women, but the man is cancelled at the first whisper of an accusation. It’s sexist.

I understand the point you’re making but the facts don’t support them. The *fact* is that women are most likely to be killed by their partners, which is not true for men. The FBI says 70% of intimate-partner deaths are women.

Also…I think it may be incorrect to say men are “cancelled” at a “whisper” of an allegation because, again, there’s Johnny Depp in a major motion picture, making millions. That’s a kind of cancelled a lot of people aspire to.

You trying to justify heards behavior and Depps abuse at her hands by talking a bout statistics shows just how much you hate men.

I’m sorry I seem to have triggered you but I didn’t “justify” anything, I refuted the idea that somehow the domestic violence situation in the United States is “a huge issue” of women beating men. That isn’t the case. It is also not the case that Depp had “his career taken away” while simultaneously starring in a Harry Potter movie.

My hottake from the Depp/Heard situation, which I haven’t followed closely, is that they’re both profoundly damaged people, one of whom had more resources than the other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
My hottake from the Depp/Heard situation, which I haven’t followed closely, is that they’re both profoundly damaged people, one of whom had more resources than the other.

THIS, EXACTLY!!