Fairfax Murder

[Anonymous]

Joe Ryan’s friends and family have been very vocal in their support of Joe and Christine being victims… not hearing that open support from the husband Brendans “circle”. RIP JOE AND CHRISTINE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Joe Ryan’s friends and family have been very vocal in their support of Joe and Christine being victims… not hearing that open support from the husband Brendans “circle”. RIP JOE AND CHRISTINE

I have noticed that also! I think that says a lot.

[Anonymous]

I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

I knew Christine as well. And I KNOW Brendan and Christine are not gonna have some bum ass person around their house so this “Joe” had a job and all of that. Don’t tarnish Christine‘s name by inferring that she would have some riffraff around her home. There was no forced entry in to the home. They all knew each other.

[Anonymous]

Ok then I’m sure we’ve met. I certainly am not tarnishing Christine or Brendan in any way. I agree they would not have riffraff around their home. I’d love to know what Joe did for a living…still unanswered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

I knew Christine as well. And I KNOW Brendan and Christine are not gonna have some bum ass person around their house so this “Joe” had a job and all of that. Don’t tarnish Christine‘s name by inferring that she would have some riffraff around her home. There was no forced entry in to the home. They all knew each other.

Having a job, or what you do for that job doesn't make you a violent criminal. Calling people riffraff who might not have a job or a job that you deem not financially or socially worthwhile also is simply classist and its pretty prejudiced behavior. It says something about your character and judgements and nothing about this case or any case. Most people that are not aware they are showing negative behavior that blocks their critical thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

Of course they know what he did for a living. They did know him, they are under no obligation to share personal details that do NOT relate to your personal beliefs about his job, or his life style. You are victim blaming right now in a very ugly way. He had no criminal background. NONE!

the waste of time is telling others that they should feel something they do not, and that they have no right to defend a person they feel was murdered and framed for a murder he didn't commit. Get over your lectures and quips, you have no moral high ground here. This is a murder of two people and the husband is under investigation. If you don't get that our legal system must investigate murders you need to check yourself, there will be a trial, there will be an arrest.

[Anonymous]

Ok go watch some more law and order. It is obvious that you and the rest of your trolls have no knowledge or insight in this case. I am well aware of how our legal system works. I was responding to the person who found it odd that people knowing the Banfield’s are not speaking to their character. The narrative that has been given regarding “Joe” is that he liked to dress up in costumes and would shovel snow for neighbors. That’s great! I look forward to the resolution of this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

I knew Christine as well. And I KNOW Brendan and Christine are not gonna have some bum ass person around their house so this “Joe” had a job and all of that. Don’t tarnish Christine‘s name by inferring that she would have some riffraff around her home. There was no forced entry in to the home. They all knew each other.

Having a job, or what you do for that job doesn't make you a violent criminal. Calling people riffraff who might not have a job or a job that you deem not financially or socially worthwhile also is simply classist and its pretty prejudiced behavior. It says something about your character and judgements and nothing about this case or any case. Most people that are not aware they are showing negative behavior that blocks their critical thinking.

I am saying these supporters of ONE of the TWO victims husband never really say any words of support they just bring up if Joseph Nathan Ryan had a job or not. I honestly think they do that to switch the narrative to JNR and his employment or lifestyle because they know how classist society is. If you Google the names involved in the case this website is top of the list and they want any mention of JNR to be followed with a comment casting a doubt on the person he was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok go watch some more law and order. It is obvious that you and the rest of your trolls have no knowledge or insight in this case. I am well aware of how our legal system works. I was responding to the person who found it odd that people knowing the Banfield’s are not speaking to their character. The narrative that has been given regarding “Joe” is that he liked to dress up in costumes and would shovel snow for neighbors. That’s great! I look forward to the resolution of this case.

You claim to know the one of the victims and her husband… must not be very well. You are the one lacking insight if you think this open and ongoing investigation is about the other victim Joe.

[Anonymous]

Has anyone said anything supportive of Joe other than that he was innocent? There is no facts to that. I have not heard anyone say anything negative about Brendan or Christine. Let the justice system do its job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can’t shoot someone and then stab someone and stage it to seem like the shot guy stabbed. And you can’t stage that the guy you haven’t shot yet stabbed someone. And the person you haven’t shot/stabbed isn’t hanging around waiting for you to finish the other part. It doesn’t make sense. If the husband did it, he would have shot them both.

people attempt to stage murders all the time. If this was open and shut then the case would not be still open. Is it still open? YES there are also two people the Au Pair and the husband, there are two dead people Christine and Joe. It is possible that one person held a gun to Joe while the Christine was murdered then shot and killed Joe. It is possible that one person shot Joe while the other stabbed Christine. If it was clear that Joe had murdered Christine the case would have been closed and announced already. It has not been closed, it's not been announced.

Agree with this. Many murder cases are closed quickly when there’s obvious evidence. Just scroll through the FCPD blog. This has obviously not been clear cut.

Oh no, I disagree. If it’s clear that the dead guy stabbed her, they still have to determine who let him in and why. Did the husband hire him as a hit man, and then cover it up by shooting him? Did the au pair conspire with him? I’m in no way saying those things happened, I’m just saying there would still be stuff to clear up and it would be hard to close the case. Especially since the survivors have (wisely, if they are innocent or not) lawyered up.

I just don’t think there’s any scenario where the husband stabbed his wife and then staged the blood to make it seem like the dead guy did it in any convincing way given the timeline. It’s not possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

I knew Christine as well. And I KNOW Brendan and Christine are not gonna have some bum ass person around their house so this “Joe” had a job and all of that. Don’t tarnish Christine‘s name by inferring that she would have some riffraff around her home. There was no forced entry in to the home. They all knew each other.

Having a job, or what you do for that job doesn't make you a violent criminal. Calling people riffraff who might not have a job or a job that you deem not financially or socially worthwhile also is simply classist and its pretty prejudiced behavior. It says something about your character and judgements and nothing about this case or any case. Most people that are not aware they are showing negative behavior that blocks their critical thinking.

I am saying these supporters of ONE of the TWO victims husband never really say any words of support they just bring up if Joseph Nathan Ryan had a job or not. I honestly think they do that to switch the narrative to JNR and his employment or lifestyle because they know how classist society is. If you Google the names involved in the case this website is top of the list and they want any mention of JNR to be followed with a comment casting a doubt on the person he was.

of course you are right! Of course someone's job does not have anything to do with violence or this case. It is a way to deflect attention away from the actual facts and the case still be totally open. JNR sure sounds like a victim to me, and it still remains that the case is totally open.

[Anonymous]

This case has OJ vibes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know Brendan and Christine very well. Support for the Banfield family is not lacking. Perhaps commenting on a narrative that is not based on evidence is a waste of time and only fuels the ridiculous ideas being brought up here. Maybe much of the investigation is regarding “Joe” and his background. Nobody even knows what that guy did for a living if anything. This case is still ongoing and in time it will be closed and the family can begin the healing process.

I know it’s hard to hear, but there is evidence of a sexual relationship between the three. Just because your friends are “good people“, do good things for the community, have jobs that help others, doesn’t mean that they can’t have a sex life that may not make sense to you.