Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the guy who wrote the one racist article got fired were still supposed to feel rage and anger... forever?

Are you daft? Why do you keep acting like these are isolated incidents, after repeatedly showing you multiple examples? The whole "acting innocently dumb" act is really not a good look for a middle-aged pearl-clutching Karen.

Your “examples” are just that she somehow received worse press than other royals. Which is patently false. There was one nasty article and a couple of questionable articles by the press. You seem to not be grasping that we know about the examples, but can still believe that MM is a liar and a drama queen. Also - calling people names is “not a good look”

Forgot to add- you probably don’t remember this since you seem young and a new royal watcher, but Camilla was crucified in the press for years in the most unfair, nasty way. So no, I don’t see meghans treatment by the press any worse than others. That said, bad nasty press is not a good thing. The difference is that Camilla and the rest handled it with grace and dignity and Meghan handled it by going nuclear on Oprah.

Yup. The offensive, racist comment by the BBC commentator was horrible and he faced consequences. Sooooo...is Kate Middleton supposed to have beheaded him or something? WTAF.

Where are these bizarre straw man arguments coming from? Who are you people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the guy who wrote the one racist article got fired were still supposed to feel rage and anger... forever?

Are you daft? Why do you keep acting like these are isolated incidents, after repeatedly showing you multiple examples? The whole "acting innocently dumb" act is really not a good look for a middle-aged pearl-clutching Karen.

Your “examples” are just that she somehow received worse press than other royals. Which is patently false. There was one nasty article and a couple of questionable articles by the press. You seem to not be grasping that we know about the examples, but can still believe that MM is a liar and a drama queen. Also - calling people names is “not a good look”

Forgot to add- you probably don’t remember this since you seem young and a new royal watcher, but Camilla was crucified in the press for years in the most unfair, nasty way. So no, I don’t see meghans treatment by the press any worse than others. That said, bad nasty press is not a good thing. The difference is that Camilla and the rest handled it with grace and dignity and Meghan handled it by going nuclear on Oprah.

Yup. The offensive, racist comment by the BBC commentator was horrible and he faced consequences. Sooooo...is Kate Middleton supposed to have beheaded him or something? WTAF.

Where are these bizarre straw man arguments coming from? Who are you people?

Who TF are you? What TF are you whining about? You and your ilk cite this lone example as proof of ongoing disparate treatment. It’s pointed out that he was fired. You: but it happened waaaaaahhhhh. The rational world: yes, and thankfully he got fired. You: but it happened and it’s a third party’s fault and waaah! The rational world: ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the guy who wrote the one racist article got fired were still supposed to feel rage and anger... forever?

Are you daft? Why do you keep acting like these are isolated incidents, after repeatedly showing you multiple examples? The whole "acting innocently dumb" act is really not a good look for a middle-aged pearl-clutching Karen.

Your “examples” are just that she somehow received worse press than other royals. Which is patently false. There was one nasty article and a couple of questionable articles by the press. You seem to not be grasping that we know about the examples, but can still believe that MM is a liar and a drama queen. Also - calling people names is “not a good look”

Forgot to add- you probably don’t remember this since you seem young and a new royal watcher, but Camilla was crucified in the press for years in the most unfair, nasty way. So no, I don’t see meghans treatment by the press any worse than others. That said, bad nasty press is not a good thing. The difference is that Camilla and the rest handled it with grace and dignity and Meghan handled it by going nuclear on Oprah.

Yup. The offensive, racist comment by the BBC commentator was horrible and he faced consequences. Sooooo...is Kate Middleton supposed to have beheaded him or something? WTAF.

Where are these bizarre straw man arguments coming from? Who are you people?

Who TF are you? What TF are you whining about? You and your ilk cite this lone example as proof of ongoing disparate treatment. It’s pointed out that he was fired. You: but it happened waaaaaahhhhh. The rational world: yes, and thankfully he got fired. You: but it happened and it’s a third party’s fault and waaah! The rational world: ok.

You come off as woefully unhinged. No one is doing or saying any of the things you claim. But OK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes, the double standards applied to Meghan Markle are toooootally normal. This reporter also tried to play off her double standards by using negative rumors about Meghan as justification (this is problematic in and of itself), but those rumors were debunked as a spoof. Vile.

I love how the haters are just conveniently ignoring this very compelling evidence of just how much bias goes into the British reportage of Meghan. This "journalist" couldn't be more transparent, and her smugness reeks. Gives a bad name to actual journalists anywhere.

Hypocrisy at its finest. But of course the Royal Family sycophants will find some way to either completely ignore this because it doesn't fit into their narrow worldview.

Wait I actually want to see how the Meghan haters will spin this. Would love to see the mental gymnastics in action lol. Any takers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when the guy who wrote the one racist article got fired were still supposed to feel rage and anger... forever?

Are you daft? Why do you keep acting like these are isolated incidents, after repeatedly showing you multiple examples? The whole "acting innocently dumb" act is really not a good look for a middle-aged pearl-clutching Karen.

Your “examples” are just that she somehow received worse press than other royals. Which is patently false. There was one nasty article and a couple of questionable articles by the press. You seem to not be grasping that we know about the examples, but can still believe that MM is a liar and a drama queen. Also - calling people names is “not a good look”

Forgot to add- you probably don’t remember this since you seem young and a new royal watcher, but Camilla was crucified in the press for years in the most unfair, nasty way. So no, I don’t see meghans treatment by the press any worse than others. That said, bad nasty press is not a good thing. The difference is that Camilla and the rest handled it with grace and dignity and Meghan handled it by going nuclear on Oprah.

Yup. The offensive, racist comment by the BBC commentator was horrible and he faced consequences. Sooooo...is Kate Middleton supposed to have beheaded him or something? WTAF.

Where are these bizarre straw man arguments coming from? Who are you people?

Who TF are you? What TF are you whining about? You and your ilk cite this lone example as proof of ongoing disparate treatment. It’s pointed out that he was fired. You: but it happened waaaaaahhhhh. The rational world: yes, and thankfully he got fired. You: but it happened and it’s a third party’s fault and waaah! The rational world: ok.

You come off as woefully unhinged. No one is doing or saying any of the things you claim. But OK.

Well, you’re a liar. And functionally illiterate, as I explained the recent posts to you. But OK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes, the double standards applied to Meghan Markle are toooootally normal. This reporter also tried to play off her double standards by using negative rumors about Meghan as justification (this is problematic in and of itself), but those rumors were debunked as a spoof. Vile.

I love how the haters are just conveniently ignoring this very compelling evidence of just how much bias goes into the British reportage of Meghan. This "journalist" couldn't be more transparent, and her smugness reeks. Gives a bad name to actual journalists anywhere.

Hypocrisy at its finest. But of course the Royal Family sycophants will find some way to either completely ignore this because it doesn't fit into their narrow worldview.

Wait I actually want to see how the Meghan haters will spin this. Would love to see the mental gymnastics in action lol. Any takers?

Spin what? In the video she doesn’t say anything like the blurb you have above it. What are we supposed to be outraged by?

[Anonymous]

Meghan and Harry will never be part of the BRF, in the real sense, ever again. The BRF will always worry that everything they say may end up on Oprah, or a tell-all book or ..., so they will be polite but treat them as they would strangers. The accusation of racism is almost the worst you can throw at anyone publicly. It's unfathomable how they could do this to people they supposedly love (and I still don't know how wondering about a child's skin color is racist - unless they worried it would be darker skin; clueless perhaps, given today's society, but racist? Many probably think that Meghan's skin tone is nicer Harry's!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry will never be part of the BRF, in the real sense, ever again. The BRF will always worry that everything they say may end up on Oprah, or a tell-all book or ..., so they will be polite but treat them as they would strangers. The accusation of racism is almost the worst you can throw at anyone publicly. It's unfathomable how they could do this to people they supposedly love (and I still don't know how wondering about a child's skin color is racist - unless they worried it would be darker skin; clueless perhaps, given today's society, but racist? Many probably think that Meghan's skin tone is nicer Harry's!)

The Sussexes clearly made the calculation that money was more important to them than the relationship with the BRF. No one would have tuned in to Oprah to just hear Meghan sing praises of the Queen’s corgis and the decor at the palace.

[Anonymous]

U.S. news picking up on Commonwealth movement thanks to Meghan

[Anonymous]

Whatever the palace thinks its doing, its not working. They're careening from outrage to outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever the palace thinks its doing, its not working. They're careening from outrage to outrage.

Who. Cares. This thing was outside.
Just stop trying to find things to be outraged by. Maybe take a walk or something - maskless, of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:U.S. news picking up on Commonwealth movement thanks to Meghan

What's surprising is that anyone is shocked that members of the BRF-- the most exclusive and a totally white institution that presided historically over a regime that traded slaves and colonized lands that were home to people of color-- have a race problem.

[Anonymous]

The "Caribbean experience?" What in the world??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U.S. news picking up on Commonwealth movement thanks to Meghan

What's surprising is that anyone is shocked that members of the BRF-- the most exclusive and a totally white institution that presided historically over a regime that traded slaves and colonized lands that were home to people of color-- have a race problem.

'

+10000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U.S. news picking up on Commonwealth movement thanks to Meghan

What's surprising is that anyone is shocked that members of the BRF-- the most exclusive and a totally white institution that presided historically over a regime that traded slaves and colonized lands that were home to people of color-- have a race problem.

Right? I hear one of them even donned a Nazi uniform not too long ago.