Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are screwed in 2024. If they
Harris the incur the wrath of the AA community and women. If they run her, she gets demolished in white working class areas. And Joe is way too old for a second term.

Not really. Hilarystans and older CBC insiders will complain and stir up trouble but actual voters won't care.

Harris was more about Democratic insiders and big $$$ than AA or the women voters. But those insiders and their backers still are gatekeepers who don't like to admit mistakes.

Agreed . Harris was their antidote to what they really feared - Susan Rice

Hence the smear campaign of Rice in NYT

Big mistake

Why do you think they feared Rice? She’s roughly 1,000% more competent and qualified than Harris.

AIPAC lobbied hard against Rice because Israel wants to not have any obstacles to its complete economic and social domination in the ME and an Iran , linked to the EU and America through trade contracts that then is able to sustain a moderate leadership is a threat to the construct Israeli hard right prefers to have as status quo

In other words, AIPAC doesn’t want any Dem who is capable of making facts on the ground peace in ME because that threatens Israel’s gravey train of US funding in trillions, and allows them to try to squash Irans great potential as a Tech nexus

Rice was key in giving Obama good guidance on Iran and its potential. Israel / AIPAC see that as a big threat as they want/ need Iran to stay the bogey man . In fact, they’d prefer to Nuke Iran and almost got there with Trump

Meanwhile, the real needs of most Americans are being ignored

[Anonymous]

Why do you think they feared Rice? She’s roughly 1,000% more competent and qualified than Harris.



AIPAC lobbied hard against Rice because Israel wants to not have any obstacles to its complete economic and social domination in the ME and an Iran , linked to the EU and America through trade contracts that then is able to sustain a moderate leadership is a threat to the construct Israeli hard right prefers to have as status quo

In other words, AIPAC doesn’t want any Dem who is capable of making facts on the ground peace in ME because that threatens Israel’s gravey train of US funding in trillions, and allows them to try to squash Irans great potential as a Tech nexus

Rice was key in giving Obama good guidance on Iran and its potential. Israel / AIPAC see that as a big threat as they want/ need Iran to stay the bogey man . In fact, they’d prefer to Nuke Iran and almost got there with Trump

Meanwhile, the real needs of most Americans are being ignored

That's not why Rice was not chosen.

There was video of her on five Sunday shows insisting that Benghazi was caused by a video. Do you really think the Dems wanted to revisit Benghazi?

[Anonymous]

How long have you been in Washington?

Everyone in town knows that Hilary set Susan Rice up to take the fall on Benghazi - her staff made sure that her talking points would later be proven false

There were journalists in Washington who were told by Clinton 5th column in WH to STF Up on the Utah about Benghazi or it would be their career

Same people made sure that Susan Rice was set up and took the fall . This is standard Clinton team political operating - 5th column in the WH with eyes always on her next run for the WH and blind to fact that she is a cold fish to most Americans

Tone Deaf Washington insiders , too insular and too drunk on their self importance in their mid level jobs that they engage in this crap year after year, Admin after Admin

The Politico piece is their telltale .

If this were Buckingham palace and not the WH, they are the equivalent of “ The Firm “

Meanwhile the country is served up incompetence and they all go out for beers and pat themselves on the back .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are screwed in 2024. If they
Harris the incur the wrath of the AA community and women. If they run her, she gets demolished in white working class areas. And Joe is way too old for a second term.

Not really. Hilarystans and older CBC insiders will complain and stir up trouble but actual voters won't care.

Harris was more about Democratic insiders and big $$$ than AA or the women voters. But those insiders and their backers still are gatekeepers who don't like to admit mistakes.

Agreed . Harris was their antidote to what they really feared - Susan Rice

Hence the smear campaign of Rice in NYT

Big mistake

Why do you think they feared Rice? She’s roughly 1,000% more competent and qualified than Harris.

AIPAC lobbied hard against Rice because Israel wants to not have any obstacles to its complete economic and social domination in the ME and an Iran , linked to the EU and America through trade contracts that then is able to sustain a moderate leadership is a threat to the construct Israeli hard right prefers to have as status quo

In other words, AIPAC doesn’t want any Dem who is capable of making facts on the ground peace in ME because that threatens Israel’s gravey train of US funding in trillions, and allows them to try to squash Irans great potential as a Tech nexus

Rice was key in giving Obama good guidance on Iran and its potential. Israel / AIPAC see that as a big threat as they want/ need Iran to stay the bogey man . In fact, they’d prefer to Nuke Iran and almost got there with Trump

Meanwhile, the real needs of most Americans are being ignored

Tinfoil hat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How long have you been in Washington?

Everyone in town knows that Hilary set Susan Rice up to take the fall on Benghazi - her staff made sure that her talking points would later be proven false

There were journalists in Washington who were told by Clinton 5th column in WH to STF Up on the Utah about Benghazi or it would be their career

Same people made sure that Susan Rice was set up and took the fall . This is standard Clinton team political operating - 5th column in the WH with eyes always on her next run for the WH and blind to fact that she is a cold fish to most Americans

Tone Deaf Washington insiders , too insular and too drunk on their self importance in their mid level jobs that they engage in this crap year after year, Admin after Admin

The Politico piece is their telltale .

If this were Buckingham palace and not the WH, they are the equivalent of “ The Firm “

Meanwhile the country is served up incompetence and they all go out for beers and pat themselves on the back .

I don't doubt Clinton set her up. But, Rice had to know it wasn't true. If she didn't know, then she is dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need strong allies like Jen Psacki truth tellin’ about Kamala.

Snide trailer whites step aside.

PP, Psacki practically signed her death warrant. That tweet about "bold leadership" does not mean what it says. She damned her with faint praise. What she wrote is Midwestern for "pack your shit, Kamala, before we humiliate you further."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How long have you been in Washington?

Everyone in town knows that Hilary set Susan Rice up to take the fall on Benghazi - her staff made sure that her talking points would later be proven false

There were journalists in Washington who were told by Clinton 5th column in WH to STF Up on the Utah about Benghazi or it would be their career

Same people made sure that Susan Rice was set up and took the fall . This is standard Clinton team political operating - 5th column in the WH with eyes always on her next run for the WH and blind to fact that she is a cold fish to most Americans

Tone Deaf Washington insiders , too insular and too drunk on their self importance in their mid level jobs that they engage in this crap year after year, Admin after Admin

The Politico piece is their telltale .

If this were Buckingham palace and not the WH, they are the equivalent of “ The Firm “

Meanwhile the country is served up incompetence and they all go out for beers and pat themselves on the back .

Many thanks! This is wildly better than typical DCUM drivel.

-‘professional Democrats’ poster, who spent close to 50 years in Washington

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need strong allies like Jen Psacki truth tellin’ about Kamala.

Snide trailer whites step aside.

PP, Psacki practically signed her death warrant. That tweet about "bold leadership" does not mean what it says. She damned her with faint praise. What she wrote is Midwestern for "pack your shit, Kamala, before we humiliate you further."

Psacki tells us all what she really thinks with her non- verbals . Look at that presser again and you’ll see how she makes 2 self soothing gestures ( flip of her hair and cocks her neck ) she is uncomfortable because she is being forced to publicly stand up for Kamala while behind Kamala’s back and out of view of all of us ….

[Anonymous]

Susan Rice isn’t dumb, but she is loyal.

Supposedly, Hilary had a blood clot and was “ resting “ and that line was pushed to hide the true hand at play when the request was made up the line that Susan face the press.

Her own mother, a long time friend of Madeline Albright and a Highly connected and astute Washingtonian herself suspected her daughter was being set up

Why does every Administration wander around in the fog in the Middle East - because they are chained to a political alliance with hardline Israel that makes no one trust them . Garbage I tell in because of lack of trust and garbage decisions made

Susan Rice is feared because she is smart enough to cut through all that BS and forged a policy with European allies to ensure that Iran could be shifted back into more moderate run country and a tech center to boot . Hard line Israel hates the idea of a moderate and financially successful Iran because they want complete hegemony in ME and endless US financial support

[Anonymous]

“ garbage intelligence in …leads to garbage decisions made “

[Anonymous]

Susan Rice is supremely qualified for higher office. And you’re saying that she is being kept down by the Israel lobby alone? Not sure I believe that but it is odd that she is rarely mentioned as a candidate for VP. Maybe she’s not interested?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need strong allies like Jen Psacki truth tellin’ about Kamala.

Snide trailer whites step aside.

Oh, baby, you gotta push snide trailer whites like me aside -- and good luck with that. And tell Psacki (sic) that she needs to tone down the red dye job -- speakin' of trailer types.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Susan Rice is supremely qualified for higher office. And you’re saying that she is being kept down by the Israel lobby alone? Not sure I believe that but it is odd that she is rarely mentioned as a candidate for VP. Maybe she’s not interested?

PP, where were you in the late Spring / Early Summer of 2020 - under a rock ?

Susan Rice was in the final list of 3, which precisely why certain individuals called on favors for hit jobs on her to be run in. NYT and WAPO

So, flash forward a year and we could have had a Rhode scholar, who had a solid and well functioning track record as an assist to a recent POTUS , well known to all world leaders who has the acumen to not just follow along in an Intel or Emergency briefing , but can actually stand in

Instead of that , we have a former DA from San Francisco who is being promoted by her sister but can’t even lead her staff well - let alone the country of needed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joe would have won with Michigan gov. Gretchen Whitmer. And Gretch would have been grinning ear to ear in Washington, not constantly trying to be the star of the show and kick Joe into a retirement home like conniving Kamala.

I think Joe's camp dumps Kamala for Stacey Abrams. Stacey is genuinely sharp and charming, Kamala is genuinely a documented idiot who makes my skin crawl.

Stacy Abrams - now there’s a good idea

So, we have no ceded the VP slot to a woman of color -- pick one, any one, as long as she is charming -- and writes good sex scenes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:!

You can play the same game for Kamala in a identity politics neutral way as well:

Kamala was picked: 1.) because she is one of the most progressive voting senators and Biden the "moderate" needed to shore up support across the party (2.) because she is young and Biden needed an energetic-seeming running mate to counteract claims that he is old and frail and 3.) because she came at the recommendation of Obama to whom Biden owed much of his political fortunes.

Identity politics is the explanation of first impulse for Kamala whereas the neutral ones are the explanation for Biden. Ask yourself why? Why is the explanatory power of id pol for perceived deficiencies so natural and reflexive in the one instance and not the other? Yes, part of it is statements Joe made and his political calculus. But then again those statements and assumptions don't even need to be spoken in the context of picking someone like Joe because it is already back into the cake and normalized. He has always been the default.

I don't think either of them are particularly gifted politicians, but that "impulse" and the weighting of identity politics is what Kamala defenders are pointing to.

Bruh. Joe said he picked her because she is a black woman and her own WH page is all about how she's intersectional multiracial blasian bicultural daughter of immigrants. That's how she presents herself, with her demographic identity front and center. You can't reduce yourself to stereotypes and then be stunned when people feel like they don't know you. Maybe she should cut back on the tropes and let us see what she's got.

She’s got nothing. That’s why she has to hide behind the identity politics.

THIS ENTIRE THREAD SMACKS OF RACISM AND MISOGYNY AND JEFF NEEDS TO DELETE IT RIGHT NOW!

Plus she married a Jewish guy rather than a MOC -- so let's throw in some anti-Semitism.