Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

I knew all of this is exactly what would happen unless Trump was being taken out of the WH in handcuffs. So amusing to see it play out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was saved by his stupidity and arrogance. He and his campaign and White House were deemed to be too disorganized and impulsive to commit to and execute a conspiracy. On obstruction of justice, Trump was saved by being such a fool that he said it and tweeted it all publicly, which proves he is too much of a buffoon to execute a criminal conspiracy.

Inform your fellow liberals of your views.
Some of them seem to think that he is such a master mind that he has pulled the wool over Mueller's eyes. In their view - he colluded but Mueller couldn't prove it.

The liberal take on this whole investigation is hysterical!

My take is that we need to see the full Mueller report. If it exonerates Trump, he should make it public, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I heard is that Mueller did not make a conclusion in his report. He compiled the evidence and told Barr to reach his own conclusions. And Barr has decided his boss is not guilty. So once we read the report for ourselves (ahem) we can know if that's a reasonable, or a partisan conclusion on Barr's part. Correct?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/republicans-cheer-democrats-challenge-muellers-findings-on-trump-and-russia/2019/03/25/3b30a74e-4e8d-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html?utm_term=.517bfc82dc9f

"During a briefing at the Justice Department about three weeks ago, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III made a revelation that those supervising his work were not expecting, a person familiar with the matter said: He would not offer a conclusion [/u]on whether he believed President Trump sought to obstruct justice....Attorney General William P. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who were among those briefed March 5, made the call Mueller would not, determining that the evidence was insufficient to allege that Trump had obstructed justice."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was saved by his stupidity and arrogance. He and his campaign and White House were deemed to be too disorganized and impulsive to commit to and execute a conspiracy. On obstruction of justice, Trump was saved by being such a fool that he said it and tweeted it all publicly, which proves he is too much of a buffoon to execute a criminal conspiracy.

Inform your fellow liberals of your views.
Some of them seem to think that he is such a master mind that he has pulled the wool over Mueller's eyes. In their view - he colluded but Mueller couldn't prove it.

The liberal take on this whole investigation is hysterical!

My take is that we need to see the full Mueller report. If it exonerates Trump, he should make it public, no?

Well, since he's said he wants it public and Barr agreed to make it public, we're all happy, right? No need to pass a resolution about it. It's like shoving yourself through an open door.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I heard is that Mueller did not make a conclusion in his report. He compiled the evidence and told Barr to reach his own conclusions. And Barr has decided his boss is not guilty. So once we read the report for ourselves (ahem) we can know if that's a reasonable, or a partisan conclusion on Barr's part. Correct?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/republicans-cheer-democrats-challenge-muellers-findings-on-trump-and-russia/2019/03/25/3b30a74e-4e8d-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html?utm_term=.517bfc82dc9f

"During a briefing at the Justice Department about three weeks ago, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III made a revelation that those supervising his work were not expecting, a person familiar with the matter said: He would not offer a conclusion [/u]on whether he believed President Trump sought to obstruct justice....Attorney General William P. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who were among those briefed March 5, made the call Mueller would not, determining that the evidence was insufficient to allege that Trump had obstructed justice."

No, it is for a judge/Jury or in the case of Trump, the Congress to determine. It is not up to Barr; and that was likely Mueller's intention, to bring it to Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was saved by his stupidity and arrogance. He and his campaign and White House were deemed to be too disorganized and impulsive to commit to and execute a conspiracy. On obstruction of justice, Trump was saved by being such a fool that he said it and tweeted it all publicly, which proves he is too much of a buffoon to execute a criminal conspiracy.

Inform your fellow liberals of your views.
Some of them seem to think that he is such a master mind that he has pulled the wool over Mueller's eyes. In their view - he colluded but Mueller couldn't prove it.

The liberal take on this whole investigation is hysterical!

My take is that we need to see the full Mueller report. If it exonerates Trump, he should make it public, no?

Well, since he's said he wants it public and Barr agreed to make it public, we're all happy, right? No need to pass a resolution about it. It's like shoving yourself through an open door.

Yes, let's see it. Can't miss a chance to humiliate the libs, right? Since it totally exonerates Trump.

[Anonymous]

When you know that the left has totally lost it............

Raw Story headline: Trump entertains Russian hockey player and Putin ally in the White House

"It has only been a few short days since Attorney General Bill Barr released his summary of the special counsel’s report about Russia interference into the 2016 election, and President Donald Trump is already entertaining “prominent” Russians at the White House."

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/trump-entertain-russian-hockey-players-in-the-white-house/


Yep, he had the Washington Capitals, the Stanley Cup winners as guests. I joked about this on this thread. I never thought the media would make it a nefarious act.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was saved by his stupidity and arrogance. He and his campaign and White House were deemed to be too disorganized and impulsive to commit to and execute a conspiracy. On obstruction of justice, Trump was saved by being such a fool that he said it and tweeted it all publicly, which proves he is too much of a buffoon to execute a criminal conspiracy.

Inform your fellow liberals of your views.
Some of them seem to think that he is such a master mind that he has pulled the wool over Mueller's eyes. In their view - he colluded but Mueller couldn't prove it.

The liberal take on this whole investigation is hysterical!

My take is that we need to see the full Mueller report. If it exonerates Trump, he should make it public, no?

Well, since he's said he wants it public and Barr agreed to make it public, we're all happy, right? No need to pass a resolution about it. It's like shoving yourself through an open door.

Is it public? No.

Why is McConnell fighting it?

Unless or until it is public, it just makes Trump (and Barr) look guilty of something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew all of this is exactly what would happen unless Trump was being taken out of the WH in handcuffs. So amusing to see it play out.

It is unbelievable. This anchor who got it wrong and whipped up the Liberals is trying to save his something. This is beautiful.

It's like y'all forget how limited the scope of this investigation was, and that there are such things as state investigations.

Bet Trump's business dealings are squeaky clean, eh? Is that audit over yet? Can we see the tax returns now? At the same time as the Mueller report, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was saved by his stupidity and arrogance. He and his campaign and White House were deemed to be too disorganized and impulsive to commit to and execute a conspiracy. On obstruction of justice, Trump was saved by being such a fool that he said it and tweeted it all publicly, which proves he is too much of a buffoon to execute a criminal conspiracy.

Inform your fellow liberals of your views.
Some of them seem to think that he is such a master mind that he has pulled the wool over Mueller's eyes. In their view - he colluded but Mueller couldn't prove it.

The liberal take on this whole investigation is hysterical!

My take is that we need to see the full Mueller report. If it exonerates Trump, he should make it public, no?

Well, since he's said he wants it public and Barr agreed to make it public, we're all happy, right? No need to pass a resolution about it. It's like shoving yourself through an open door.

Is it public? No.

Why is McConnell fighting it?

Unless or until it is public, it just makes Trump (and Barr) look guilty of something.

Nobody is fighting it, babe. Like I said, a resolution is meaningless when you've been told it will be public by those who decide. Do you know that they will need a bit of time to make the necessary redactions? Is that permissible?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I heard is that Mueller did not make a conclusion in his report. He compiled the evidence and told Barr to reach his own conclusions. And Barr has decided his boss is not guilty. So once we read the report for ourselves (ahem) we can know if that's a reasonable, or a partisan conclusion on Barr's part. Correct?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/republicans-cheer-democrats-challenge-muellers-findings-on-trump-and-russia/2019/03/25/3b30a74e-4e8d-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html?utm_term=.517bfc82dc9f

"During a briefing at the Justice Department about three weeks ago, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III made a revelation that those supervising his work were not expecting, a person familiar with the matter said: He would not offer a conclusion [/u]on whether he believed President Trump sought to obstruct justice....Attorney General William P. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who were among those briefed March 5, made the call Mueller would not, determining that the evidence was insufficient to allege that Trump had obstructed justice."

No, it is for a judge/Jury or in the case of Trump, the Congress to determine. It is not up to Barr; and that was likely Mueller's intention, to bring it to Congress.

You don't know law, do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I heard is that Mueller did not make a conclusion in his report. He compiled the evidence and told Barr to reach his own conclusions. And Barr has decided his boss is not guilty. So once we read the report for ourselves (ahem) we can know if that's a reasonable, or a partisan conclusion on Barr's part. Correct?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/republicans-cheer-democrats-challenge-muellers-findings-on-trump-and-russia/2019/03/25/3b30a74e-4e8d-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html?utm_term=.517bfc82dc9f

"During a briefing at the Justice Department about three weeks ago, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III made a revelation that those supervising his work were not expecting, a person familiar with the matter said: He would not offer a conclusion [/u]on whether he believed President Trump sought to obstruct justice....Attorney General William P. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who were among those briefed March 5, made the call Mueller would not, determining that the evidence was insufficient to allege that Trump had obstructed justice."

No, it is for a judge/Jury or in the case of Trump, the Congress to determine. It is not up to Barr; and that was likely Mueller's intention, to bring it to Congress.

You don't know law, do you?

Actually, he does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know some of you poo-poo this, but for those with an open mind, this shows how Barr may have conflated and parsed to the extreme to come to the conclusion that exonerates Trump:

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1110266463506567168

Is it 100% accurate? None of us will know unless or until the Mueller report is made public, but it makes enough sense to leave doubt over Barr's very partisan objectives. The fact that Barr and McConnell are now fighting to keep the Mueller report out of public light leaves enough doubt that further exacerbates divisiveness in our country. The only way to address that is through transparency. Why won't McConnell and Barr be transparent?

We "poo-poo" it because it's Seth Abramson - a huge conspiracy theorist. He attempts to connect dots where none exist.
I can't believe after all that has come out that people still read what he writes.

So you fully support the transparency required to know if his conspiracy read of Barr's letter is accurate or not?

I fully support the release of Mueller's report as allowed by law. Some things cannot be released.
Who doesn't support this?

McConnell.

[Anonymous]

https://www.amazon.com/Mueller-Report-Special-Counsel-Collusion/dp/1510750169/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=2ZCUGRPVPD89F&keywords=mueller+report&qid=1553604383&s=gateway&sprefix=mue&sr=8-1

https://www.amazon.com/Mueller-Report-Washington-Post/dp/1982129735/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?crid=2ZCUGRPVPD89F&keywords=mueller+report&qid=1553604422&s=gateway&sprefix=mue&sr=8-2

It’s on amazon and delivered by April 30th.