Cop Suspended After Video Emerges Of Brutal Arrests At Teen Pool Party (In McKinney Texas)

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

Jeff, if you know the previous PP is a troll, please tell us.

If you don't, I'd say your response above is inappropriate and racist. PP's opinion is as valid as everyone else's, and to have DCUM's God himself descend from the skies to make an unwarranted attack resembles bullying. IMO of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh the quotes are all screwed up...


I am not the PP. But this is McLean, VA? I am not saying this story is not true, but it seems Susie is crazy. McLean, VA right, not McLean, Kentucky or Mississippi.

Did you ever just think, Susie and Becky are crazy?

Yes, McLean, VA. I don't think Susie or Becky are crazy. I think Susie is the type described by a poster up thread. She doesn't want to fight anyone else's fight. She just wants to have a party for her little girl with no drama. My DD's presence might cause drama. She didn't call me back to say it was a misunderstanding, Becky didn't clarify today with DD or ask her if she was coming. Such is life. My point was that it was no big deal to her to basically dis-invite my DD because she is AA, and some of her pool members might say something. Party went on as planned. That's cool. But now I have to deal with the fall-out. And there already is. I have received 4 emails asking why DD wasn't at the party when we originally said we would be there. But that might be because I was supposed to bring deviled eggs and everyone loves my deviled eggs.

Susie is crazy.

You should answer the emails. Susie did not want my daughter there because she is AA. Hit send.

I would do this but I also gives no damns. If you want to be more diplomatic you could hint at this: Susie and I had a conversation and I decided it was best that we skip this event.

Yup. My email would read "Larla did not attend Beck'y party because, based on the events in Texas, Susie was very concerned and was not sure whether the members of her pool would treat Larla appropriately as she would be the only AA at the party. Once Susie implied that she might uncomfortable, we thought it best to keep Larla home as not to be a distraction to Becky's party."

I responded to the emails pretty much word for word of this poster. I got a WTF? text immediately from one of the mom's and a call from another mom who is also a member of the same club apologizing for Susie thinking something would happen at the club. She did say folks at the pool had been talking about the Texas incident...

I really didn't want to derail OP's thread. By posting my story, I really just wanted folks to realize that these issues are not in the abstract or anecdotal. That middle class/upper middle class AA's have to deal with issues of race all the time. Just because my child goes to an expensive private school, she is not immune from the same circumstances that other AA children face that are not so fortunate. The Texas incident really brought into focus that many white Americans see AA children in a such a poor light that even when the police officer is denounced for his actions, it is our child's fault that he behaved in that manner.

I am not a very eloquent writer, so pardon me if I haven't worded my posts very well and I definitely don't want to disparage the Langley Pool and Tennis center. I want my children to be treated fairly and justly if they ever come in contact with LEOs. Not with the lenses of "I arrested 10 black kids last week for some shenanigins and dumb $hit, so this little black Larla that I called to mall about must be guilty when I walk up on her and she gives me the side eye when I ask her a question.

She is a preteen about to be teenager, not a "Teen-ager lady".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

Jeff, if you know the previous PP is a troll, please tell us.

If you don't, I'd say your response above is inappropriate and racist. PP's opinion is as valid as everyone else's, and to have DCUM's God himself descend from the skies to make an unwarranted attack resembles bullying. IMO of course.

Huh? What is racist and an attack? I am confused.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

Jeff, if you know the previous PP is a troll, please tell us.

If you don't, I'd say your response above is inappropriate and racist. PP's opinion is as valid as everyone else's, and to have DCUM's God himself descend from the skies to make an unwarranted attack resembles bullying. IMO of course.

Huh? What is racist and an attack? I am confused.

I will be honest and likely open myself up to ridicule, however this thread itself is becoming very confusing. I'm not sure what anyone is arguing about anymore really and why are we talking about "Becky" and "Suzie" and "Larla" etc. I'd like to think I am a smart cookie too.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

Jeff, if you know the previous PP is a troll, please tell us.

If you don't, I'd say your response above is inappropriate and racist. PP's opinion is as valid as everyone else's, and to have DCUM's God himself descend from the skies to make an unwarranted attack resembles bullying. IMO of course.

My response is inappropriate and racist? You are taking the "DCUM has become the Onion" suggestion a little too seriously. Did you bother to read the post? It was insulting to previous posters, full of denial of the impact of racism, and concluded by claiming that society considers white males the "root of all evil". My response was, if anything, restrained.

The incident involving the swimming pool -- if it happened as reported here -- is about as clearcut case of racism that you are going to see these days. "You can't come because you are black" is about as basic as you can get. Responding to that with a tale of racial discrimination complaints never being true and white males being unfairly considered evil is pretty ridiculous Of course, it's her opinion and she is welcome to express it. But, I don't have to be silent about it.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't this guy get suspended then he resigned. Obviously he did something wrong.

Not necessarily

Necessarily.

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/collin-county/2015/06/09/mckinney-officer-resigns-from-the-force/28760035/

"The actions of Eric Casebolt are indefensible," police Chief Greg Conley told reporters at a news conference late Tuesday afternoon, saying the officer was "out of control during the incident."

This is what happens when you know the score - behave as planned or have your police department in Federal crosshairs. Doesn't matter if the girl was trespassing. Doesn't matter that she mouthed off to an officer. Doesn't matter that she resisted arrest. She has the right to do all that because she's being protected by liberal idiots and the New Black Panthers.

Sounds like a great future for these youth. Let them keep being disrespectful assholes, believing they are above the law. The only future they have is working for the Feds.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't this guy get suspended then he resigned. Obviously he did something wrong.

Not necessarily

Necessarily.

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/collin-county/2015/06/09/mckinney-officer-resigns-from-the-force/28760035/

"The actions of Eric Casebolt are indefensible," police Chief Greg Conley told reporters at a news conference late Tuesday afternoon, saying the officer was "out of control during the incident."

Administrative leave is not the same thing as being suspended.

Actually, I believe it is. More importantly, the officer clearly did something wrong and what he did was "indefensible" (despite the efforts of some posters here to defend them).

Your bias may be blinding you, Jeff.

Few if any posters here defended the suspended officer's overreaction. What many posters here (myself included) were trying to say is that 1) the overreaction had more to do with the teenager's individual behavior than with some general racism, and that 2) as a general rule, the best way to avoid police overreactions is to not act as a smart ass (and, not jump over fences and be part of a group trespassing property).

NP - is there any evidence that the girl he tackled was trespassing? Or that she had jumped over a fence?

Nope. But there is quite a lot of evidence that she was part of such a group (that, remember, has created enough chaos to send 12 cops over) and that she acted as a smart ass instead of just leaving the scene as requested.

Just to be clear, are you defending the officer's actions? You seem to be providing a justification.

Not the PP but I, personally, am defending his actions. He was called to the scene by residents in the community. He sees a mob of unruly kids who are not listening and mouthing off. And he acted accordingly. All you have is the video tape; it seems that residents there are telling quite a different story. Some being interviewed are saying that this isn't the first time they've had issues with some of these kids; that the have come before, been unruly, and even engaged in sexual activity in front of some of the youngsters in the community. You might be quick to dismiss these residents claims; I'm not. I feel that more will come out down the pike and the media will quietly slink away onto the next issue with nary a apology, and move onto the next incident. And there WILL be another. At this point, seeing how activists are always on scene in a heartbeat, I'm inclined to think there is more to this all than meets the eye.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't this guy get suspended then he resigned. Obviously he did something wrong.

Not necessarily

Necessarily.

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/collin-county/2015/06/09/mckinney-officer-resigns-from-the-force/28760035/

"The actions of Eric Casebolt are indefensible," police Chief Greg Conley told reporters at a news conference late Tuesday afternoon, saying the officer was "out of control during the incident."

This is what happens when you know the score - behave as planned or have your police department in Federal crosshairs. Doesn't matter if the girl was trespassing. Doesn't matter that she mouthed off to an officer. Doesn't matter that she resisted arrest. She has the right to do all that because she's being protected by liberal idiots and the New Black Panthers.

Sounds like a great future for these youth. Let them keep being disrespectful assholes, believing they are above the law. The only future they have is working for the Feds.

1. She did not resits arrest. She resisted having her hair pulled and thrown the the ground roughly. The cop was clearly rough with her from moment one.
2. If she was trespassing, which we do not know yet, it is moot because the officer told her to leave. Her "arrest" was not for trespassing it was for pissing the cop off .
3. She was in fact leaving but mouthed off. Sorry, but we do not get arrested for that in this country.

Finally, she has the right to mouth off and not be manhandled because she is an American citizen, and a minor to boot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't this guy get suspended then he resigned. Obviously he did something wrong.

Not necessarily

Necessarily.

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/collin-county/2015/06/09/mckinney-officer-resigns-from-the-force/28760035/

"The actions of Eric Casebolt are indefensible," police Chief Greg Conley told reporters at a news conference late Tuesday afternoon, saying the officer was "out of control during the incident."

This is what happens when you know the score - behave as planned or have your police department in Federal crosshairs. Doesn't matter if the girl was trespassing. Doesn't matter that she mouthed off to an officer. Doesn't matter that she resisted arrest. She has the right to do all that because she's being protected by liberal idiots and the New Black Panthers.

Sounds like a great future for these youth. Let them keep being disrespectful assholes, believing they are above the law. The only future they have is working for the Feds.

1. She did not resits arrest. She resisted having her hair pulled and thrown the the ground roughly. The cop was clearly rough with her from moment one.
2. If she was trespassing, which we do not know yet, it is moot because the officer told her to leave. Her "arrest" was not for trespassing it was for pissing the cop off .
3. She was in fact leaving but mouthed off. Sorry, but we do not get arrested for that in this country.

Finally, she has the right to mouth off and not be manhandled because she is an American citizen, and a minor to boot.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ all this.

Except, she was black so she should have shut up and just stayed in her place, I guess.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Not the PP but I, personally, am defending his actions. He was called to the scene by residents in the community. He sees a mob of unruly kids who are not listening and mouthing off. And he acted accordingly. All you have is the video tape; it seems that residents there are telling quite a different story. Some being interviewed are saying that this isn't the first time they've had issues with some of these kids; that the have come before, been unruly, and even engaged in sexual activity in front of some of the youngsters in the community. You might be quick to dismiss these residents claims; I'm not. I feel that more will come out down the pike and the media will quietly slink away onto the next issue with nary a apology, and move onto the next incident. And there WILL be another. At this point, seeing how activists are always on scene in a heartbeat, I'm inclined to think there is more to this all than meets the eye.

Is there anyone who still wishes to dispute my claim that there are posters who are defending the police officer? Or, is this just another case of my bias and emotions clouding my judgement?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

Jeff, if you know the previous PP is a troll, please tell us.

If you don't, I'd say your response above is inappropriate and racist. PP's opinion is as valid as everyone else's, and to have DCUM's God himself descend from the skies to make an unwarranted attack resembles bullying. IMO of course.

My response is inappropriate and racist? You are taking the "DCUM has become the Onion" suggestion a little too seriously. Did you bother to read the post? It was insulting to previous posters, full of denial of the impact of racism, and concluded by claiming that society considers white males the "root of all evil". My response was, if anything, restrained.

The incident involving the swimming pool -- if it happened as reported here -- is about as clearcut case of racism that you are going to see these days. "You can't come because you are black" is about as basic as you can get. Responding to that with a tale of racial discrimination complaints never being true and white males being unfairly considered evil is pretty ridiculous Of course, it's her opinion and she is welcome to express it. But, I don't have to be silent about it.

I am the PP and not a troll

I wouldn't call your response racist, but it is a typical 'Jeff' reaction. Jeff has little to counter and resorts to humor. I don't mind. As I said, this is irrelevant. I, however, am curious as to what in my message exactly points to:

1. Insult of previous posters;
2. Anything regarding the impact of racism.

Today's society does consider white males the root of all evil. (I can phrase it differently, I guess, but I'm too tired to bicker about semantics.) My kid, like every white male in the country, is better off not touching race with a six-foot pole. This may be news in McLean, but the rest of us have been informed accordingly.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the PP but I, personally, am defending his actions. He was called to the scene by residents in the community. He sees a mob of unruly kids who are not listening and mouthing off. And he acted accordingly. All you have is the video tape; it seems that residents there are telling quite a different story. Some being interviewed are saying that this isn't the first time they've had issues with some of these kids; that the have come before, been unruly, and even engaged in sexual activity in front of some of the youngsters in the community. You might be quick to dismiss these residents claims; I'm not. I feel that more will come out down the pike and the media will quietly slink away onto the next issue with nary a apology, and move onto the next incident. And there WILL be another. At this point, seeing how activists are always on scene in a heartbeat, I'm inclined to think there is more to this all than meets the eye.

Is there anyone who still wishes to dispute my claim that there are posters who are defending the police officer? Or, is this just another case of my bias and emotions clouding my judgement?

Okay, one, finally!

What I noticed is when it comes to the teenagers, the phrase 'we don't know yet' surfaces much more often than when it comes to the officer. Do I need to explain why? Nah, didn't think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if your child had a friend who was a minority, you would not invite that child to a party because there is "potential" trouble inviting that kid to a private pool? See...here is the issue. I do not see what trouble could arise other than some busybody making a comment. Which, if this is my child's friend, I will stand up and respond to. I do not care what color they are. What kind of example are you setting for your child? Keep quiet if one of your friends is treated unjustly? You may be able to live in peace, but your child is the one who is going to have to face her friend everyday in school. And these are just children! No way I would put my own child or her friend through that. Belonging to "the club" is just not that important to me (and I DO belong to a private pool that, thankfully, has a number of AA families).

This is where we part. I don't have a private pool. I don't belong to a private club. I live among many black people, not 'a number of AA families'. Where I stand, it's more important to keep your nose clean and avoid any blemish on your personal record the best way you can. We, the great unwashed, have to keep it real. We don't have lawyers on retainer to deal with potential civil suits from angry moms of allegedly mistreated kids.

I oversee a very diverse group of people at work. Racial conflict is not common, but it surfaces once in a while. Not once have I heard a substantiated claim from a black employee who complained about 'racism'. I have to deal with the fallout, because it's my job. But I want to spare my kid this insanity. Go ahead, judge and label me all you want; it is irrelevant to me. Because my child is a white male, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. When push comes to shove, he will be deemed the root of all evil by default. I have to teach my child to stay away for his own sake. I have seen too many lives practically ruined over false allegations. My child deserves better.

White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. I've said it before, but DCUM truly has become the Onion.

Jeff, if you know the previous PP is a troll, please tell us.

If you don't, I'd say your response above is inappropriate and racist. PP's opinion is as valid as everyone else's, and to have DCUM's God himself descend from the skies to make an unwarranted attack resembles bullying. IMO of course.

I'm not Jeff, and I will say it. White males, apparently the most oppressed group on earth. Only a fool would believe that crock of manure. You gotta love the insanity of DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not the PP but I, personally, am defending his actions. He was called to the scene by residents in the community. He sees a mob of unruly kids who are not listening and mouthing off. And he acted accordingly. All you have is the video tape; it seems that residents there are telling quite a different story. Some being interviewed are saying that this isn't the first time they've had issues with some of these kids; that the have come before, been unruly, and even engaged in sexual activity in front of some of the youngsters in the community. You might be quick to dismiss these residents claims; I'm not. I feel that more will come out down the pike and the media will quietly slink away onto the next issue with nary a apology, and move onto the next incident. And there WILL be another. At this point, seeing how activists are always on scene in a heartbeat, I'm inclined to think there is more to this all than meets the eye.

Is there anyone who still wishes to dispute my claim that there are posters who are defending the police officer? Or, is this just another case of my bias and emotions clouding my judgement?

Okay, one, finally!

What I noticed is when it comes to the teenagers, the phrase 'we don't know yet' surfaces much more often than when it comes to the officer. Do I need to explain why? Nah, didn't think so.

WHAT?????
You don't know who did and did not tresspass.
You saw exactly what the officer did and even his fellow officers felt it To restrain him.
The girl followed orders, but ran her mouth. Being a embarrass is not illegal.