Well, the guy was a principal at a school that was damn near all minorities. And there have been other incidents with that principal. |
The adult woman pays for herself. Those in subsidized housing are being supported by taxpayers. Please tell me you are not disparaging an adult woman who has limited income and has found a free-market solution to that by bringing in a paying roommate. |
Matt Walsh makes an important point in his article: Does that let the officer off the hook? Not necessarily. I can agree that he shouldn’t have cursed at these kids, though it’s hard for me to cry tears over it considering they were just blasting vulgar music. But, still, he should have remained calm. Of course, it’s easy for me to say this, as I’ve never had to almost single handedly control a rowdy mob of 100 teenagers who are predisposed to dislike me because of my profession. Have you? Whether he had reason to detain the girl is impossible to know at this point. I do know that if she’d walked away as she was told, this could have been avoided. I also know that making her into a martyr only validates her behavior. And if she disobeyed a lawful order, then she brought this completely on herself. To say otherwise is to suggest that she ought to be allowed to do whatever the hell she wants, which is precisely the attitude many of these teens had, and precisely the attitude a mature and grown up society would try to break, not encourage. The bolded is exactly correct. |
|
Once you wrote "Matt Walsh", I knew the rest would be garbage |
I'm disparaging an adult who does NOT pay for herself but has her own rent/mortgage subsidized by a roommate having the nerve to insult a government program that subsidizes housing. Clearly she's in no position to pay her own way either. And wasn't it reported that she has children? So why isn't a husband helping to pay her way? And frankly I'm also disparaging white trash that tries to make them self feel better about their lot in life by trying to insult based on race. It's only trash (and insecure)who do this. The weight, comments thrown, and fighting in the street were dead giveaways for me. Then we get the black roommate. A classy woman she is not. |
I think this is where the analysis breaks down. He did not single handedly have to do anything. There were a dozen officers on the scene. He was the ONLY officer that behaved this way. In my mind, that fact plays HUGE in my assesment of him conduct. |
|
EXACTLY! People will play this out as they want to see. No matter that the other professional LEO's who were there displayed radically different behaviour, no matter that the kid taping the whole thing was treated radically different, no matter that he even corroborates the party thrower's account, folks will want to find a way to make sure that the most important transgression was that of the girl that got thrown to the ground. End of story. It's about black kids being bad, if they weren't bad they would have not brought this on themselves. |
[/b] Is the black woman involved in the fight considered trash too? She was no lightweight herself (or at least her bitties were not). I get the feeling she had some not too nice words for the woman she was fighting with. Is she considered trash? or is that all just another day in the hood/subdivision? |
WhT you clearly do not understand is her roommate entered I to the agreement and the benefit is mutual. Not so for government housing. |
Because if you are white, having a black roomate is trashy? you are RACIST! |
The other officers knew what would happen if they engaged in any way. And they were correct |
The G-damn irony is just too much-thanks for a good laugh! What would you consider bi-racial people? according to your logic they do not deserve to exist! Get yourself an edumacation girl! |
+ 1,000 |