Hayfield Football Coach Fired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are the #3 team in the state - https://www.si.com/high-school/virginia/top-25-virginia-high-school-football-rankings-10-28-2024-01jb9fxz5rn4

Here are the class 6 public schools in this week’s Washington Post Top Twenty (which ranks all local high schools public and private): #7 Madison, #8 Hayfield, #16 Patriot, #20 W-L.

[Anonymous]

The linker above post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2024/10/28/football-top-20/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are the #3 team in the state - https://www.si.com/high-school/virginia/top-25-virginia-high-school-football-rankings-10-28-2024-01jb9fxz5rn4

Here are the class 6 public schools in this week’s Washington Post Top Twenty (which ranks all local high schools public and private): #7 Madison, #8 Hayfield, #16 Patriot, #20 W-L.

Patriot and Battlefield are underrated

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

How did the other public HS team end up with "so much more talent"? By cheating.

Good for Chantilly for pointing out the elephant in the room that FCPS tried to sweep under the rug.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

How did the other public HS team end up with "so much more talent"? By cheating.

Good for Chantilly for pointing out the elephant in the room that FCPS tried to sweep under the rug.

Just because they have talent doesn’t mean they cheated. There are public schools with more talent than Hayfield. Every schools student body isn’t created equal. That’s why we have competition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

How did the other public HS team end up with "so much more talent"? By cheating.

Good for Chantilly for pointing out the elephant in the room that FCPS tried to sweep under the rug.

Just because they have talent doesn’t mean they cheated. There are public schools with more talent than Hayfield. Every schools student body isn’t created equal. That’s why we have competition.

The team and Hayfield's student body are two very different things. This has gotten absurd thanks to a gutless superintendent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

How did the other public HS team end up with "so much more talent"? By cheating.

Good for Chantilly for pointing out the elephant in the room that FCPS tried to sweep under the rug.

Just because they have talent doesn’t mean they cheated. There are public schools with more talent than Hayfield. Every schools student body isn’t created equal. That’s why we have competition.

The football team has nothing to do with the students who attend Hayfield because they live in boundary for Hayfield

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

How did the other public HS team end up with "so much more talent"? By cheating.

Good for Chantilly for pointing out the elephant in the room that FCPS tried to sweep under the rug.

Just because they have talent doesn’t mean they cheated. There are public schools with more talent than Hayfield. Every schools student body isn’t created equal. That’s why we have competition.

The football team has nothing to do with the students who attend Hayfield because they live in boundary for Hayfield

Michelle Reid says different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, completely plausible that a kid would have attended Hayfield for 3 years and then decides--as a senior--to play tackle football for the first time.

I have a kid who did this because he didn’t like his coach. Also Dug McDaniel did it and had a great senior year. I can see this happening if a bad program suddenly becomes a good program.

Irrelevant bc Hayfield didn't have a bad program.

No kid doesn't play tackle football at all for 3 years and then starts playing as a senior. Sorry, not buying it.

Hayfield wasn’t good last year. They only beat teams that were awful and anytime they played a mediocre team, they lost by around 50.

I thought Hayfield won the National District title last year. That’s a big deal. Winning districts.

They tied for the championship in the district that is gerrymandered to have the weakest programs. It's a big deal in the sense that none of the schools was ever going to beat a Patriot District team in the playoffs so it's nice that they get a trophy for beating each other.

Right, I’m starting to think Hayfield isn’t such an elite team after all. They are probably just a decent team in a super weak district

Not sure how "elite" they are but they are unfairly stacked. Look at the Chantilly game score, 70-0?

Wouldn’t say unfair, but they. Are stacked. And the Chantilly coach bought that one.

Yes, unfairly stacked is correct.

He "bought" what?

That shellacking.

By...not cheating like the Hayfield coach? Hmmm.

He disrespected a program that was more talented than his so in return, the other coach had no mercy.

How did the other public HS team end up with "so much more talent"? By cheating.

Good for Chantilly for pointing out the elephant in the room that FCPS tried to sweep under the rug.

Madison is ranked higher than Hayfield. Does that mean Madison cheated?

[Anonymous]

There are reports circulating on Twitter that VHSL has issued a post-season ban on Hayfield for the 2024 season. Hayfield is supposedly appealing.